Skip Navigation

Sri Lanka

  • Member Since 2015
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 15
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Sri Lanka is currently implementing 15 commitments from their 2019-2021 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to public services, inclusion, anti-corruption and citizen participation.


Contact


Commitments


Resources

  1. Sri Lanka – Contrary to Process and Status Letter – March 2024

    2024, Letter, Web page

  2. Sri Lanka Co-Creation Brief 2023

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Sri Lanka – Procedural Review Resolution by C&S Subcommittee (April 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  4. Sri Lanka – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  5. Sri Lanka Hybrid Report 2019-2021

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Sri Lanka – Contrary to Process Letter (March 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  7. Sri Lanka Hybrid Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Sri Lanka End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Sri Lanka End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Sri Lanka Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  11. Sri Lanka – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  12. Sri Lanka Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Sri Lanka Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Sri Lanka 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  15. Sri Lanka Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. Sri Lanka National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2015, Action Plan, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
0
1
Action Plan 2
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

image12

Sri Lanka – Citizens Use the RTI Law to Retrieve Government Compensation

After decades of failed initiatives to promote the right to information, Sri Lanka finally enacted its Right to Information Act (RTI) in 2016. The law allows Sri Lankans to scrutinize their government more closely...

Shyamala-Gomez

Faces of Open Government: Shyamala Gomez

Shyamala Gomez is the Executive Director at the Centre for Equality and Justice. How have gender commitments in Sri Lanka’s action plans contributed to inclusion and gender equality? Sri Lanka’s first OGP national action plan had two commitments on women.…

Show More
Open Government Partnership