2022-2024
Action Plan 5
Compared to the previous plan, the fourth action plan showed progress in consistency, ambition, and inclusion of key issues, both from the civil society agenda regarding rights and democratic governance and from the global OGP agenda. However, it reported setbacks in its implementation, with the proportion of commitments completed at least substantially and an even greater reduction in the proportion of commitments with significant early results. Likewise, the implementation process experienced a higher-than-usual drop in civil society participation due, at least in part, to the perception of the negative impacts of the discontinuity caused by the change in government management. However, it also yielded valuable lessons, particularly about the potential of the strategy adopted to federalize open government. (More)
Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
As an activist, feminist, and founder of the Foundation for Women’s Studies, Mabel Bianco has dedicated her life to ensuring and enhancing women’s rights in Argentina, including through open government initiatives. Watch her story.
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2023, Inception Report, Web page
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
2023, Resource, Web page
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, Inception Report, Web page
2022, Inception Report, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
In recent years, the open government agenda has taken on increasing relevance in mining public policy based on the implementation of reforms, regulations, and tools focused on transparency and participatory dialogue...
En los últimos años la agenda de gobierno abierto ha tomado una creciente relevancia en la política pública minera a partir de la implementación de reformas, normativas y herramientas centradas en la transparencia del sector y el diálogo participativo. Argentina…
In this blog series, we highlight the experiences of several open parliaments around the world. These are institutions that foster transparency, participation, and accountability throughout the legislative process. The Legislature of the Córdoba Province in Argentina is a unicameral legislative…
Learn about Argentina's efforts to integrate gender and diversity perspectives into Argentina’s fourth open government national action plan as a tool for mainstreaming into future open government commitments.
Esta publicación de blog explora los aspectos más destacados del informe de Argentina, Incorporación de la Perspectiva de géneros y diversidad en el Cuarto Plan de Acción Nacional de Gobierno Abierto. Encuentre el resumen ejecutivo disponible en inglés y español…
In the past, the City of Buenos Aires had very few opportunities to work on public policies concerning the LGBTQIA+ community from an open government perspective. Through an OGP commitment, my team, the Undersecretariat for Open Government and Accountability, is…
Anteriormente, la Ciudad de Buenos Aires tenía pocas oportunidades de trabajar con la comunidad LGBTQIA+ desde la perspectiva de gobierno abierto. A través de un compromiso de OGP, mi equipo, la Subsecretaría de gobierno abierto y rendición de cuentas, está…
The 2030 Agenda is a key tool to deepen the open government development model. Working with an array of stakeholders like the private sector...
La Agenda 2030 es una herramienta fundamental para profundizar el modelo de desarrollo de gobierno abierto. Trabajando con una diversidad de actores como...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish