Publicize Information About Government Activities and Civic Participation in Governance. (LT0016)
Status quo or problem addressed by the commitment Currently, there is a lack of uniform communication and measures for shaping a positive image of the activities of public institutions, enabling appropriate and efficient communication of the message about the value of public consultations for the population. What is missing as regards the uniform communication, is common visual identity, messages communicating the proposal of the value and other means of communication to ensure uniform and highquality delivery of information to the people on public consultations, and to motivate involvement in public governance. First, government-accountable institutions and agencies lack common standards for publicizing information about government activities; second, communication is effected by different institutions with different communication skills and resources, which prevents uniform message of Government activities. A more effective and faster public communication calls for the use of the public information channels that are in line with the latest communication trends. Social networks currently claim strong positions in this regard. 65 per cent of the average age of Lithuania’s population use the Internet every day, most of them have Facebook accounts. 37 per cent of the population aged 15-74 access Facebook on daily basis (TNS data 2016). Effective communication in social networks requires an active generation of interesting content and high-quality visual presentation. Main objective To increase accessibility to information about governmental activities and civic engagement in governance. Brief description of commitment Public information about the activities of the Government should be easily accessible and presented in a clear and understandable form in most appropriate for them communication channels. At the same time, the public has to have access information on public governance processes and participation possibilities. It is necessary not only to systematically publicize this information, but also to ensure methodological assistance to institutions and strengthen their capacities needed for greater openness of public governance processes.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
2. To develop and implement measures for publicizing information about government activities and civic participation in governance
Public information about the activities of the Government should be easily accessible and presented in a clear and understandable form in most appropriate for them communication channels. At the same time, the public has to have access information on public governance processes and participation possibilities. It is necessary not only to systematically publicize this information, but also to ensure methodological assistance to institutions and strengthen their capacities needed for greater openness of public governance processes.
2.1. Development of the guidelines (recommendations) for the publicity of governmental activities with a view to ensure appropriate for the people publicizing of governmental activities, focusing on a common standard, interactivity, feedback and efficiency, through the application of the latest uniform communication standards, methods and tools.
2.2. Creation of an interactive electronic newsletter on governmental activities.
2.3. Development of a PowerPoint template for the presentation of governmental activities.
2.4. Creation of templates for publicizing government activities 'Open Government' publicity campaign in 'Facebook' social network.
Responsible institution: Office of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania
Supporting institution(s): N/A
Start date: 31 December 2016
End date: 31 December 2017
Context and Objectives
This commitment seeks to increase the accessibility of information on government activities and civic engagement opportunities in governance. Specifically, it calls for standardizing the publication of information on government activities and providing capacity-building trainings for public officials who will later work to increase civic engagement in decision-making processes. According to Edita Baniene, the advisor at the Communications Department in the Office of the Government, government ministries lack communication skills to promote public consultations, and there is currently no common template used by ministries for consultations.[Note: Edita Baniene, interview by IRM researcher, 22 September 2017] Citizens of Lithuania are either not aware of the possibilities to engage in decision-making, or the available information is too complicated for most citizens to understand.[Note: 'Citizens’ Survey on the Openness of municipalities', Transparency International Lithuania, 2014, http://www.transparency.lt/tils-tyrimai-ir-analizes/.] Public consultation is rare in Lithuania. According to a 2014 Transparency International Lithuania survey, only 5 percent of respondents said that they have participated in a consultation.[Note: 'Citizens’ Survey on the Openness of municipalities', Transparency International Lithuania, 2014, http://www.transparency.lt/tils-tyrimai-ir-analizes/.]
Although Edita Baniene suggested a clearer view on the content of the commitment in an interview with the IRM researcher, the specificity is low because the commitment does not specify which government activities will be publicized. The commitment also does not have a coherent problem identified. In some parts, it is written that there is a lack of 'positive information' about the government's activities, while elsewhere it states that there is a lack of 'interesting information' or insufficient information on the activities in general. This commitment focuses on improving public awareness for opportunities to participate in consultations, but does little to improve the effectiveness of the consultations themselves. The current low level of public consultations in Lithuania suggests that increasing public participation requires more extensive measures than merely improved communication on consultation opportunities. Thus, the potential impact is marked as minor. It is worth noting that this commitment targets the same problem as Commitment 6 'To Create Public Consultation Mechanism.' According to the Office of the Government, this commitment is designed to better communicate opportunities for consultation to the public, while Commitment 6 is designed to create and the methodology for public consultations and organize them. Had these commitments been combined, the potential impact and specificity would have been greater, but taken individually, this commitment is unlikely to increase public participation.
The deadline for the commitment is the end of 2017, and the Office of the Government has begun implementation. At the time of writing this report, the Office of the Government has a final draft of its visual identity toolkit and has scheduled trainings for public officials, namely for communication specialists from the government and from the House of President.
Because the Office of the Government is working to both create a public consultation mechanism and develop its communication guidelines, the IRM researcher recommends joining this commitment with Commitment 6 on creating the public consultation mechanism. This would allow different teams at the Office of the Government to have their own roles and responsibilities to achieve the same goal.
LT0024, 2018, E-Government
NGO Database, NGO Fund
LT0025, 2018, Civic Space
Publish Fiscal Information
LT0026, 2018, E-Government
Public Services by NGOs
LT0027, 2018, Capacity Building
Monitoring and Evlauation for Public Participation
LT0028, 2018, Public Participation
Legislative Process Evaluation
LT0029, 2018, Capacity Building
Build Open Data Portal, and Integrate Into the European Single Digital Market.
LT0015, 2016, Capacity Building
Publicize Information About Government Activities and Civic Participation in Governance.
LT0016, 2016, Capacity Building
Publish Online Information About Revenues and Spending of National and Municipal Institutions
LT0017, 2016, E-Government
Create and Broadcast Social Advertisements That Target Corruption in the Healthcare System
LT0018, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Create Legal, Organizational and Technical Tools to Easily Access Detailed Information About Election and Voting Procedures
LT0019, 2016, E-Government
Create Public Consultation Mechanism
LT0020, 2016, Capacity Building
Foster Open Public Governance Culture in Public Sector
LT0021, 2016, Capacity Building
Creation of NGO Database.
LT0022, 2016, Civic Space
Creation of NGO Fund.
LT0023, 2016, Capacity Building
Public Service Quality Improvements
LT0007, 2014, Capacity Building
Developing and Promoting E-Services
LT0008, 2014, E-Government
Encouraging Public Participation
LT0009, 2014, E-Government
Raising Civic Awareness
LT0010, 2014, Education
National Civil Society Fund Model Development
LT0011, 2014, Civic Space
Accessibility of Public Information
LT0012, 2014, E-Government
Public Decision-Making Transparency
LT0013, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Promoting Anti-Corruption Education
LT0014, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Increase of the Accessibility of the Information Held by Public Administration Authorities.
LT0001, 2012, Records Management
Centralised Publishing of Information on Government Activities
LT0002, 2012, Records Management
More Extensive Public Consultations
LT0003, 2012, Public Participation
Promotion of Public Participation in Public Administration Processes
LT0004, 2012, Legislature
Increasing the Accessibility of Services Provided to the Public.
LT0005, 2012, E-Government
Promotion of Public Participation in the Process for the Improvement of Service Provision
LT0006, 2012, Public Participation