Skip Navigation

Pakistan

  • Member Since 2016
  • No action plan

ON THE PAGE


Pakistan is currently designated  INACTIVE  in OGP pursuant to the Procedural Review. Learn more here.


Current Action Plan

Date not specified

No action plan

  • Number of Commitments: None
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

38963253051_0fc91a801a_o

Global Report

The promise of democracy is often defined by the ballot box, where citizens determine who will represent their interests in government. That promise, however, too often fails to translate to the reality of people’s daily lives...

OGG title graphic no logos

A Guide to Open Government and the Coronavirus

Check out this guide for a one-stop shop of the best current resources on how open government projects and approaches can support tackling the pandemic.


Contact

Point of Contact

Sajjad Azhar Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Finance sajjadazhar.sgd@gmail.com

No commitments found


Resources

  1. Pakistan – Notification of Late Action Plan (Procedural Review) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web Page

  2. Pakistan – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web Page

  3. OGP Letter – Pakistan – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web Page

  4. OGP Letter – Pakistan – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  5. Pakistan – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  6. Pakistan – Inactivity Letter – February 2020

    2020, Letter, Web page

  7. Pakistan – Letter from Steering Committee Regarding Inactivity Resolution (March 2020)

    2020, Letter, Web page

  8. Pakistan – Notification of Late Action Plan (Procedural Review) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  9. Pakistan – Steering Committee Resolution Regarding Inactivity (February 2020)

    2020, Web page

  10. Pakistan Under Review Letter (Updated 4 October 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page


OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

full size Asia OR + OR webinar

Open Data in Focus

“Youth Power... Youth Power... Youth Power...”, the group chanted, the voices of youth participants resonating around the conference room. The organizing team enthusiastically joined in, while I focused the camera to record the zeal on their faces, the enthusiasm in…

blog_pakistan_chart

A new beginning in Pakistan

This blog is part of a series on public service delivery for open government. The government of a middle-income country wanting to hold itself accountable? Possible. Wanting to base this accountability on hard numbers that tell us how 200 million…

Show More
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!