Ignorer la navigation

Rapport initial - Plan d'action - Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Équateur, 2024 - 2025

Marché

Nom de l'évaluateur

Instituto JAPON

Email

[email protected]

Nom de membre

Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Équateur

Plan d'action Objet

Plan d'action – Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Équateur, 2024 – 2025

Section 1.
Conformité avec
exigences de co-création

1.1 Existe-t-il un forum ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

During the development of the Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, a Forum multipartite was established, comprising representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other interested stakeholders. This space facilitated dialogue and collaboration, enabled the collection and analysis of citizens’ proposals, helped identify challenges, and contributed to the selection of the commitments included in the Action Plan. Periodic meetings were also held to review proposals and make joint decisions, as well as specific meetings with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality to address the engagement related to the preservation of their ancestral and cultural heritage. The composition and participation of the Forum are documented in the Second Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The existence of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum is documented in the Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas. The section describing the Plan’s development process outlines the participation of representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other interested stakeholders. It also states that this space promoted dialogue and collaboration, enabled the collection and analysis of citizens’ proposals, and participated in the selection of the commitments. The document also records periodic meetings and meetings with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality. These elements provide evidence of the establishment and participation of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum in the processus de co-création du plan d'action.

1.2 Le forum est-il multipartite ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The existence of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum is documented in the Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas. The section describing the Plan’s development process outlines the participation of representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other interested stakeholders. It also states that this space promoted dialogue and collaboration, enabled the collection and analysis of citizens’ proposals, and participated in the selection of the commitments. The document also records periodic meetings and meetings with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality. These elements provide evidence of the establishment and participation of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum in the co-creation process of the Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas documents the establishment and participation of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum, which included representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other interested stakeholders. During the co-creation process, this space facilitated dialogue and collaboration, enabled the collection and analysis of citizens’ proposals, and contributed to the selection of the commitments included in the Plan. In addition, periodic meetings were held to review proposals and make joint decisions, as well as specific meetings with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality. This information provides preuve of the participation of governmental and non-governmental stakeholders.

1.3 Le forum organise-t-il au moins une réunion avec la société civile et les acteurs non gouvernementaux lors de la co-création du plan d'action ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

During the co-creation process of the Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, the Multi-Stakeholder Forum held meetings attended by representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other non-governmental stakeholders. These meetings provided opportunities to discuss, analyze, and consolidate citizens’ proposals, review the progress of the process, and make joint decisions regarding the commitments that would form part of the Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Open Government Action Plan documents that, during the co-creation process, periodic meetings of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum were held, in which representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other interested stakeholders reviewed proposals and made joint decisions. In addition, specific meetings were held with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality to address the commitment related to the preservation of their ancestral and cultural heritage. This information demonstrates that the Forum held meetings with governmental and non-governmental stakeholders during the development of the Plan.

1.4 Le plan d'action a-t-il été approuvé par les parties prenantes du forum ou Comité d'organisation/groupe?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas was approved through a participatory process in which the stakeholders who are members of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum contributed to the analysis, review, and selection of the commitments. Through dialogue spaces and working meetings, representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and other stakeholders participated in the decision-making process to consolidate the content of the Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Open Government Action Plan of the Province of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas states that the Multi-Stakeholder Forum participated in the process of reviewing, analyzing, and selecting the proposals that formed the commitments of the Plan. It also establishes that the Forum’s periodic meetings enabled the review of proposals and the adoption of joint decisions, while the Forum was responsible for the final selection of the commitments. This participation and joint decision-making provide evidence of the approval and validation of the Plan by the stakeholders who were members of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum.

Section 2.
Pratiques recommandées
en co-création

2.1 Le gouvernement maintient-il un site Web OGP local ou une page Web sur un site Web gouvernemental où des informations sur le processus local OGP (co-création et mise en œuvre) sont publiées de manière proactive?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The Provincial Decentralized Autonomous Government of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas has an site web institutionnel where information related to the Local Open Government (OGP Local) process is published, including information on co-creation activities, action plans, commitments, and actions carried out during their implementation. This platform allows citizens and interested stakeholders to access information related to the OGP Local process.

2.2 Le gouvernement a-t-il fourni des informations aux parties prenantes à l'avance pour faciliter une participation informée et préparée au processus de co-création ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The Provincial Decentralized Autonomous Government of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas provided stakeholders with information in advance, facilitating their informed and prepared participation in the co-creation process of the Second Open Government Action Plan. Through dialogue spaces, meetings, and participation mechanisms, information related to the process was shared, allowing stakeholders to become familiar with the proposals, analyze the challenges, and provide their input before the commitments of the Plan were defined.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Open Government Action Plan documents that, during the co-creation process, a public consultation was conducted to gather citizens’ proposals and opinions, allowing the main challenges and opportunities of the province to be identified. In addition, periodic meetings of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum were held to review proposals and make joint decisions, as well as special meetings with representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality. The document also states that throughout the process, the progress made in the development of the Plan was continuously disseminated, with the purpose of keeping citizens informed and facilitating their active participation. This information demonstrates that mechanisms and advance information were provided to facilitate informed participation in the co-creation process.

2.3 Le gouvernement a-t-il veillé à ce que tout membre intéressé du public puisse contribuer au plan d'action et observer ou avoir accès à la documentation de prise de décision ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

Participation by interested members of the public was ensured through a public consultation to gather citizens’ proposals and opinions during the development of the Second Action Plan. The proposals were analyzed and consolidated by the Multi-Stakeholder Forum, which participated in the selection of the commitments. In addition, the progress of the process was continuously disseminated, allowing citizens to stay informed and actively participate.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Open Government Action Plan documents that a public consultation was conducted to gather citizens’ proposals and opinions, which were analyzed and consolidated by the Multi-Stakeholder Forum. In addition, periodic meetings were held to review the proposals and make joint decisions, and the Multi-Stakeholder Forum was responsible for the final selection of the commitments. The document also states that throughout the process, updates on the development of the Plan were continuously disseminated, ensuring that citizens remained informed and could participate actively. These elements demonstrate that the process was open to receiving citizens’ input and that information about decision-making was disseminated.

2.4 Le gouvernement a-t-il fait un rapport proactif ou fourni des commentaires écrits aux parties prenantes sur la manière dont leurs contributions ont été prises en compte lors de la création du plan d'action ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

During the development of the Second Action Plan, stakeholders were proactively informed through the continuous dissemination of updates on the progress of the process. The proposals and opinions collected through the public consultation were analyzed and consolidated by the Multi-Stakeholder Forum, which held periodic meetings to review the proposals and make joint decisions. In this way, citizens’ input was taken into account in the selection and definition of the commitments that were ultimately included in the Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Open Government Action Plan states that a public consultation was conducted to gather citizens’ proposals and opinions. These proposals were analyzed and consolidated by the Multi-Stakeholder Forum and subsequently reviewed during periodic meetings, where joint decisions were made.

2.5 Y a-t-il eu un dialogue itératif et une appropriation partagée entre les parties prenantes gouvernementales et non gouvernementales pendant le processus de prise de décision, y compris l'établissement de l'ordre du jour ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

During the development of the Second Action Plan, there was an ongoing dialogue process between the Provincial Government and civil society actors and other non-governmental sectors, primarily through the Multi-Stakeholder Forum. Public consultations and periodic meetings were held to present and review proposals, discuss progress, and make joint decisions. In addition, the Multi-Stakeholder Forum participated in the final selection of the commitments, demonstrating shared responsibility in defining the priorities and content of the Action Plan.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Action Plan states that the development process was carried out through a participatory, inclusive, and transparent approach, with a Multi-Stakeholder Forum established as a space for dialogue and collaboration between civil society and government actors.

2.6 Considérez-vous que le forum est inclusif et diversifié ?

Très

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The Multi-Stakeholder Forum is inclusive and diverse because it brings together representatives of the Provincial Government, civil society organizations, academic institutions, organizations working on droits de l'homme, productive and tourism sectors, as well as representatives of the Tsáchila Nationality. This diversity of stakeholders made it possible to incorporate different perspectives, knowledge, and needs into the co-creation process of the Action Plan. In addition, the document explicitly highlights the l'inclusion and participation of the Tsáchila ethnic group, strengthening the representativeness of the Forum and the participatory process.

Fournissez des références ici (par exemple, des entretiens) :

The Second Action Plan identifies the Provincial Decentralized Autonomous Government, civil society organizations such as FUNDAPI, RAGA Ecuador, CADHU Ecuador, and Fundación Ecológica Chanchay; academic institutions such as ESPE Santo Domingo and the Tsáchila Higher Technological Institute; public entities such as the Ministry of Production and IEPS; representatives of the Provincial Participation citoyenne Assembly; tourism and productive sector stakeholders such as Equinoccial Touring, the Mancomunada Public Company of the Humid Tropics, and the Chamber of Tourism; and the Government of the Tsáchila Nationality as members of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum. In addition, the Plan expressly highlights the importance of the inclusion and participation of the Tsáchila ethnic group. This composition demonstrates the institutional, social, academic, productive, and cultural diversity of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum.

Section 3.
Évaluation initiale
des engagements

1 Engagement :

Collaborative design and implementation of a training program and system for new jeunesse leaderships in rural areas with a focus on environmental care and sustainable tourism

1.1 L'engagement est-il vérifiable ?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The commitment is verifiable because the Second Open Government Action Plan establishes specific activities, deliverables, and expected results that allow its progress and implementation to be objectively assessed. These include the creation of a web-based educational platform, the development of training programs and educational materials, the identification and monitoring of participants, the training of leaders in sustainable development and sustainable tourism, and the implementation of sustainable practices in rural economic and tourism activities. The Plan also establishes specific project milestones and achèvement dates, providing concrete elements for monitoring and verification.

1.2 Le langage/les activités d'engagement justifient-ils clairement pertinence aux valeurs OGP?

Oui

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The language of the commitments and their activities establishes a clear connection with OGP values by incorporating actions aimed at strengthening transparence, citizen participation, and collaboration. The commitments include co-creation processes, the participation of diverse stakeholders, access to and publication of information, as well as collaborative mechanisms to address needs identified in the province.

1.3 Veuillez sélectionner une option qui décrit le mieux l'engagement :

une nouvelle réglementation, politique, pratique ou exigence.

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The commitment constitutes a new practice, as it incorporates Open Government mechanisms and actions that had not previously been established in this way within provincial government management. Its implementation introduces new forms of collaboration between the Provincial Government, civil society, and other stakeholders through co-creation processes, citizen participation, innovation, and the generation of open information. These actions seek to establish new institutional practices aimed at strengthening transparency, participation, and collaboration in public management.

1.4 Veuillez sélectionner une option qui décrit le mieux l'engagement :

entraînera un changement des règles, pratiques ou politiques qui régissent un domaine politique, le secteur public et/ou les relations entre les citoyens et est contraignante ou institutionnalisée dans l'ensemble du gouvernement ou d'une ou plusieurs institutions spécifiques.

Expliquez brièvement votre réponse :

The commitment will lead to changes in the practices and policies of the Provincial Decentralized Autonomous Government of Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas by incorporating Open Government mechanisms aimed at strengthening citizen participation, collaboration, transparency, and access to public information. The planned actions, such as the co-creation of a provincial ordinance, the generation and publication of données ouvertes, and the establishment of collaborative mechanisms, will help institutionalize new forms of management and interaction between the Provincial Government and citizens. In this way, the results of the commitment can be permanently incorporated into the institutional processes and practices of the Provincial Government.

1.5 Y a-t-il des changements recommandés à la conception de l'engagement pour aider à améliorer sa mise en œuvre ?

It is not considered necessary to make changes to the design of the commitment, as its objectives, activities, and deliverables are clearly defined and are appropriate to guide its implementation and monitoring.

Pas encore de commentaires

Laissez un commentaire

Votre adresse courriel n'apparaitra pas. Les champs obligatoires sont marqués *