Strengthen the Information Mechanism in 60 Governmental Agencies (AF0011)
Action Plan: Afghanistan Action Plan 2017-2019
Action Plan Cycle: 2017
Lead Institution: Ministry of Information and Culture (MoIC)
Support Institution(s): 60 governmental agencies and Monitoring Commission on Access to Information, Civil society, media and UNESCO Office in Kabul
Policy AreasAccess to Information, Capacity Building, E-Government, Public Participation, Records Management, Right to Information, Social Accountability Measures & Feedback Loops
Evaluation of information units, preparing the plan to strengthen the Information Mechanism in 60
governmental agencies and its implementation
January 2018 - August 2019
Lead implementing agency/actor Ministry of Information and Culture (MoIC)
What it the public problem that
the commitment will address?
According to the reports published by the Monitoring Commission on
Access to Information, information units have been established in 60
government agencies at national level in Afghanistan. However, these
units are said to be ineffective, as they offer limited access to digital
forms of information due to lack of a comprehensive information
database, deficient documentations system and prolonged waiting
periods to attain requested information.
Therefore, ineffectiveness of the existing information units has led to
continued lack of public and media access to information, undermining
transparency, accountability and responsiveness in governmental
What is the commitment? In order to address the mentioned challenges MoIC is intended to 1)
assess the capacities at these units; 2) formulate a capacity development
plan with a purpose to enhance the capacity of these units to deliver their
mandate and 3) to implement the capacity development plan in the MoIC
and Ministry of Mines and Petroleum, Independent Administrative
Reform and Civil Service Commission, and Ministry of Transport as a
It is expected that the implementation of this commitment will ensure
that there is a well-functioning digital and manual system of information
management and dissemination in place. This will ultimately ensure
existence of digitalized data, smooth processing of public requests and
easy public access to the data within the aforementioned ministries.
How will the commitment
contribute to solve the public
The commitment will enable journalists, research organizations, CSOs
and related agencies to share their insights for improving the plan.
The digitalization of information management within the agencies will
expedite the dissemination of information ensuring that the public gains
easy and timely access to all relevant information.
Another advantage associated with the digitalization of information is
that it will ensure all data requests are formally documented and lodged.
Why is this commitment relevant
to OGP values?
This commitment is relevant to Open Government Partnership values
because it is inclusive of public participation. Moreover, the
implementation of this commitment will enhance public access to
accurate information thereby promoting accountability and transparency
in the public sector.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
Language of the commitment as it appears in the action plan:
“According to the reports published by the Monitoring Commission on Access to Information, information units have been established in 60 government agencies at national level in Afghanistan. However, these units are said to be ineffective, as they offer limited access to digital forms of information due to lack of a comprehensive information database, deficient documentations system and prolonged waiting periods to attain requested information.
Therefore, ineffectiveness of the existing information units has led to continued lack of public and media access to information, undermining transparency, accountability and responsiveness in governmental agencies.
In order to address the mentioned challenges MoIC is intended to 1) assess the capacities at these units; 2) formulate a capacity development plan with a purpose to enhance the capacity of these units to deliver their mandate and 3) to implement the capacity development plan in the MoIC and Ministry of Mines and Petroleum, Independent Administrative Reform and Civil Service Commission, and Ministry of Transport as a pilot project.Milestone activities and verifiable deliverables
- MoIC establishes the Information Units Reform Panel (IURP) consisting of CSO’s who are member of Oversight Commission on Access to Information and MoIC’s employees to develop a plan and tools to inform the methodology of the assessment that will be carried out in the information units.
- IURP carries out the assessment in 60 information units and produces the findings of the report. The findings of assessment will be publicized and made available via MoIC website.
- IURP creates a capacity development program based on the findings of the assessment. The capacity development program will be made available via MoIC website.
- The capacity development program is implemented within the targeted ministries with the technical support of IURP.
- IURP produces a lessons learned report on the implementation of the program in the targeted ministries. The report will be shared with all information units and stakeholders as well as made available via MoIC website.”
Start Date: January 2018
End Date: August 2019
Editorial Note: This is a partial version of the commitment text. For the full commitment text from the Afghanistan National Action Plan see: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/commitment/11-strengthen-information-mechanism-60-governmental-agencies
Context and Objectives
This commitment aims to establish the Information Units Reform Panel (IURP) consisting of CSO’s and government representatives in order to a) evaluate the capacity of the 60 information units; b) design a capacity development plan; and c) implement the plan as a pilot project in four governmental entities.
Although 60 information units have been established within various governmental agencies, assessments show that they are ineffective. This restrains public and media’s access to information, undermines transparency, accountability and responsiveness in governmental agencies. 
Following Article 50 of the Afghan Constitution and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Afghanistan passed the Law on Access to Information on 23 December 2014. The law requires all government offices to publish information on contracts, policies, etc., provide information upon request within 10 business days, as well as a mechanism for engaging with the public. Article 16 concerns the establishment of the Monitoring Commission on Access to Information (the Commission), to be composed of 11 members from government, as well as CSOs, the private sector, and political parties. Sub-national Commissions are also intended to be established in provinces.  According to the Law and following the establishment of the Commission, the Ministry of Culture and Information (MoCI), in coordination with the Commission, established 60 information units within various government entities in Kabul province. These information units, however, have been reported to be ineffective due to lack of competence and access to technology. For example, little professional capacity exists as to how to convey information to the public, including media, or how to digitally preserve information. Moreover, much of the work in such information unites are still performed on paper. 
Per the commitment text, MoCI will establish an Information Units Reform Panel (IURP), which will consist of members drawn from both government and CSO’s. IURP will assess 60 information units, develop a capacity development plan based on findings of the assessment, and implement the capacity development plan in all four targeted ministries as a pilot project for this action plan. The assessment  will look at whether: a) the unit/s actually exist; b) whether they have their own office; c) whether they are equipped with relevant technology such as computers and database programs; d) whether they have a person in charge who can be held accountable; e) whether they have the capacity to implement the law of access to information; and f) do they regularly provide reports.  The four state agencies, which are MoIC, Ministry of Mines and Petroleum, Independent Administrative Reform and Civil Service Commission, and Ministry of Transport, have been selected by the monitoring Commission based on: a) limited capacity to administer the law; and b) high demand by people to access information, including vacancy announcements.
This commitment is relevant to the OGP value of civic participation because of the active role CSOs will play in the work of the IURP. Also, it is relevant to access to information because the IURP will publish a report with findings from the assessment of 60 different information units’ capacities. Additionally, the capacity development program based on the report’s findings will be made available on the MoIC website and publicized, as well as a lessons learned report on the implementation of the program will be made available not only to OGP stakeholders but also the public at large. The activities and milestones of the commitment are specific enough to be meaningfully verifiable.
The IRM Researcher considers this commitment of minor potential impact because, as designed, while it will assess the information units of 60 government departments, it will only enhance the capacity of information units in four targeted governmental agencies in comparison to the 60 information units, which is a minor internal improvement that does not go beyond capacity building. The commitment could have a transformative potential impact if the range of government entities subject to the capacity development plan were increased. Furthermore, in its current design, it does not include a public participation mechanism where citizens and media could file their complaints and hold the state publicly accountable. Although the Access to Information Law does provide citizens with this opportunity, measures related to accountability as a result of access to information could further be bolstered if the commitment too incorporates such a mechanism.
The IRM Researcher suggests that the decision to carry over this commitment to the next action plan depends on the content and findings of the final report that the IURP will produce. In the interim, the IRM Researcher suggests the following:
- MSF could carefully examine the IURP findings and lesson learned report before making its decision on whether this commitment should be continued on to the next OGP Action Plan.
- Considering the Afghan government’s low capacity to provide information to citizens,  international consultants, with similar contexts who have been able to undertake successful measures in their own countries, can be invited to Afghanistan to train and share their experiences with Afghan officials and CSOs. The government official interviewed by the IRM researcher also raised this as an important step in the success of their work for this commitment.  As an example, the IRM researcher refers the readers to a grassroots case in Southern Mexico where social and civic movements claimed their right to information as a tool to hold the state accountable.  The focus here is on capacity building as the provision of information is a relatively new field in Afghanistan and leveraging the success of others through peer exchange and learning. Additionally, MoCI could invite specialists from the Afghanistan Center at Kabul University or the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit to conduct trainings on digital dissemination of information. Both entities have substantial experience in archiving and making available digital information.
- MoCI could develop a section on its website on the IURP where all the relevant activities and documents related to the commitment can become centralized and more easily accessible to the public.
Revise Law on Recruitment and Authority of Attorneys General
AF0014, 2019, Anti-Corruption
Revise Law on Local Government
AF0015, 2019, Legislation & Regulation
Establish Anti-Corruption Commission
AF0016, 2019, Anti-Corruption
Draft Beneficial Ownership Legislation
AF0017, 2019, Anti-Corruption
Portal for Processing Legislative Documents
AF0018, 2019, Capacity Building
CSO Monitoring of Education
AF0019, 2019, E-Government
Develop Electronic Complaint System for Local Government
AF0020, 2019, Capacity Building
Reform and Strengthen Education Data
AF0021, 2019, Access to Information
Participation in Local Budgeting
AF0022, 2019, Fiscal Openness
Electronic Revenue Collection System
AF0023, 2019, Capacity Building
Co-Create University Curriculum
AF0024, 2019, Education
Reform Promotion System for Police Officers
AF0025, 2019, E-Government
Monitoring Framework for Medicine Wholesalers
AF0026, 2019, E-Government
Monitoring of Private and Public Health Centers
AF0027, 2019, E-Government
Participation in National Budget
AF0028, 2019, Fiscal Openness
Open Justice for Anti-Corruption
AF0029, 2019, Anti-Corruption
Women's Empowerment Plan
AF0030, 2019, Gender
Establishment of Women Grand Council
AF0031, 2019, Gender
Mechanism of Public Partnership in Inspection Process
AF0001, 2017, Capacity Building
Law on Processing, Publishing and Enforcing Legislative Documents
AF0002, 2017, Legislation & Regulation
Courts to Address Violence Against Women
AF0003, 2017, Access to Justice
Public-Police Partnership Councils
AF0004, 2017, Capacity Building
Registering Assets of Government Officials
AF0005, 2017, Anti-Corruption
Scheme for Establishing Health Service Accreditation Entity
AF0006, 2017, Capacity Building
Urban Improvement National Policy
AF0007, 2017, Infrastructure & Transport
Protection Policy for Women Under Conflict and Emergency Situations
AF0008, 2017, Fiscal Openness
Civil Society Monitoring Plan for Education and Higher Education
AF0009, 2017, Education
Plan for the Establishment of a Joint Committee Overseeing the Implementation of the Anti-Corruption Strategy
AF0010, 2017, Anti-Corruption
Strengthen the Information Mechanism in 60 Governmental Agencies
AF0011, 2017, Access to Information
Implementing Open Contracting
AF0012, 2017, Access to Information
Public Participation in Road Network Projects
AF0013, 2017, Infrastructure & Transport