Improve the System for Collecting Initiatives from Citizens and Businesses (RS0017)
Action Plan: Serbia Second National Action Plan 2016-2018
Action Plan Cycle: 2016
Lead Institution: Republic Secretariat for Public Policies
Support Institution(s): Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government – eGovernment Directorate, Ministry of Economy; Civil society organisations and companies
Policy AreasCapacity Building, E-Government, Legislation & Regulation, Public Participation
THEME: Increase the role of citizens in the public policy management system; COMMITMENT 4: Improve the system for collecting initiatives from citizens and businesses; Status quo or problem addressed by the commitment: Ongoing consultations with stakeholders are crucial in the process of drafting and passing of regulations and public policy documents because they provide the required specific data and give information on the applicability of specific policy options that are being considered, as well as information on the willingness of stakeholders to take on the burden of additional obligations. Decision-makers often tend to propose, draft and pass regulations without consulting the stakeholders whose behaviour they seek to codify. In doing so, they miss the opportunity to collect meaningful information on the subject matter they seek to codify, fail to address or do not fully address the practical issues they encounter and sometimes pass inadequate provisions which are not based on a sound analysis of potential effects and available options for addressing those issues. In order to improve the role of citizens and businesses in decision-making, different models should be provided for the participation of citizens and businesses in the decision-making process. Main objective: To improve the role of citizens and businesses in the public policy management system and in the passing of regulations; Brief description of commitment (140-character limit): Different models should be available for enabling the participation of citizens and businesses in the decision-making process. An improved system for soliciting initiatives from citizens and businesses would be a key mechanism for the decision-making process. This commitment will require the installation of appropriate online software and provision of functionalities on the website of the Republic Secretariat for Public Policies (RSPP) through better, faster and easier access of citizens and businesses to the content of RSPP’s website. There are also plans to establish a Forum for Initiatives for Amendment of Inefficient Regulations in the Legislative Process. This system would enable citizens and businesses to submit initiatives to amend any existing regulations or initiatives to pass new regulations. For this system to be able to function properly, it will be necessary to build the capacities of the RSPP staff in charge of these duties. OGP challenge addressed by the commitment: Strengthening public integrity; Relevance: This commitment allows for broader civic participation in decision-making and contributed to improved cooperation and more active involvement of citizens in the process of drafting and passing of regulations. Citizens will be able to submit initiatives to amend or repeal any unnecessary regulations in accordance with the relevant procedures specified for the relevant initiative. Ambition: Once implemented, this commitment will: - Enable submission of initiatives on the RSPP for the amendment of poor regulations and for the repeal of unnecessary ones, as well as follow-up on those initiatives and access to information on the submitted initiatives and case progress; - Lead to the formation of a Forum comprised of representatives of CSOs, industry and commerce (business associations) and public administration bodies which will discuss issues agreed in advance based on received initiatives to amend and pass regulations; - Result in the adoption of internal procedures for soliciting and processing initiatives from citizens and businesses.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
For Commitment details, please see Serbia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 (Year 1).
IRM End of Term Status Summary
This commitment aimed to develop and improve instruments for citizens and businesses to use to influence government decision making. The Government committed to developing an online portal for collecting initiatives that would amend/propose legislation or abolish red tape. The intention was to encourage interaction among the users and direct contact with PPS, the main responsible institution for administering the portal and forwarding the initiatives to the responsible policy-making institutions. Users would be able to monitor the status of proposed initiatives and their outcomes. An additional planned activity was the establishment of a forum for stakeholders to discuss the initiatives that had been collected, while a final activity involved developing internal procedures for PPS to process the initiatives.
This commitment was substantially implemented by midterm. The Government established the online portal, 'Adminhack,' at the end of 2016 and piloted it within the information and communications technology (ICT) community. All submitted initiatives, their status, and the institutional response were publicly accessible and available for monitoring. RSPP organized roundtable meetings with ICT sector representatives to present and promote the portal.
The portal had received 17 submitted initiatives at the midterm, of which three had been solved/implemented. Interaction among users was limited because only four employees of PPS were responsible for administering the portal, and all had other responsibilities.
An analogous physical forum had yet to be constituted and there was no consistent message regarding its composition, working methods, or expected results. The last remaining activity was to develop internal procedures for processing initiatives and integrating/aligning them with the general procedures the RSPP used for submissions received through email and postal mail.
A physical forum for discussing proposed initiatives among the state and non-state actors was established, an activity within a project that the PPS has been implementing with NALED, a non-state actor. XX[Note14: National Alliance for Local Economic Development. See more at: http://naled.rs/ ]XX The aim has been to enhance a dialogue between relevant government institutions and six selected business associations or CSOs. XX[Note15: Project webpage: http://jpd.rs/o-projektu.php]XX At the beginning of 2018, three associations XX[Note16: Entrepreneurship Development Association, Association of Beekeeping Organizations of Serbia and Agroclaster of Serbia.]XX were selected to participate in the dialogue on one of the following topics: flat-rate taxation, improving organic production, and beekeeping. PPS representatives said that the project team was developing plans to improve policies related to each of these three areas. XX[Note17: Ninoslav Kekic, Public Policy Secretariat, interview with IRM Researcher, 6 September 2018.]XX
The project team had started organizing round tables which, within this commitment, serve as the 'forums.' So far, four meetings have been organized to discuss the flat-rate taxation, two in Belgrade, one in NiÅ¡, and one in Novi Sad. XX[Note18: Individual news articles about the events are available here: http://jpd.rs/odrzan-prvi-okrugli-sto-u-okviru-kampanje-mesec-pausalaca.php, http://jpd.rs/u-nisu-odrzan-drugi-okrugli-sto-na-temu-pausalnog-oporezivanja.php]XX Attendees included representatives of the Tax Administration, PPS, NALED, Entrepreneurship Development Association, Policy Research Centre, Pausal.rs portal, along with other business associations and entrepreneurs interested in this topic.
The public-private dialogue project and the 'Adminhack' online portal do not have any links. The web page for the dialogue introduces a different web portal where stakeholders can indicate shortcomings in legislation and in practice regarding flat-rate taxation, organic production, and beekeeping. XX[Note19: The portal is available at http://jpd.rs/ukljuci-se-u-dijalog.php ]XX At the same time, the Adminhack portal remains accessible and contains 17 submitted initiatives, six of which have been solved or implemented. According to a PPS representative, this portal is not being used. The PPS is not promoting it XX[Note20: Ninoslav Kekic, Public Policy Secretariat, interview with IRM Researcher, 6 September 2018.]XX because it has proved complicated to administer for technical reasons related to the communication with foreign web developers. The PPS intends to build a similar portal that will become an integrated part of this institution's webpage, while Adminhack might serve other purposes in the future, such as providing an online forum for discussing initiatives. Finally, according to the representative, there are other options to submit initiatives online—the portal of the public-private dialogue project, the 'ePaper' portal, (see Commitment 14) along with the option of providing submissions via email.
The internal procedures for processing online initiatives has been completed. The last edit of the procedures was done in the second quarter of 2018. XX[Note21: Ibid.]XX
Did It Open Government?
Civic Participation: Marginal
This commitment has created some new opportunities for entrepreneurs to influence decision making and voice their needs. This was initially done by means of the 'Adminhack' online portal, which created a channel for the ICT sector to engage relevant institutions. Although initiatives could previously be submitted the PPS via email, the portal was a step towards increased interaction with a focus on the ICT sector. Moreover, the project saw PPS partner with NALED, which maintains a large network of contacts and associates from the private sector, which allowed wide outreach to the potential stakeholders to encourage participation. The willingness of government actors to engage in a process of gathering key institutions to discuss improving their respective areas in a systematic and planned manner represents a positive practice. However, as NALED, rather than the Government, has been responsible for implementing the project, it remains a one-off initiative rather than an institutionalized government practice.
All activities within this commitment have targeted the entrepreneur community or involved topics related to entrepreneurship, from the promotion the portal's purpose, XX[Note22: See: https://startit.rs/pokrenut-adminhack-rs-traze-se-predlozi-it-industrije-za-smanjenjeadministrativnih-prepreka/; http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/rs/ukljuci-se-i-kreiraj-svoje-poslovnookruzenje/; https://www.vesti.rs/Dobre-vesti/Ponudite-predlog-za-smanjenje-administrativnihprepreka.html; https://www.rnids.rs/publikacije/RNIDSinfo34.pdf ]XX to the forum's topics and the results of the meetings. Although some CSOs were included, the opportunity to produce a meaningful output for ordinary citizens and the wider CSO community was missed. Similarly, since the Adminhack online portal was abandoned and proactive interaction was instead handled through face-to-face meetings, engagement opportunities for the entrepreneur community were limited to the number of associations and individuals that were able to get directly involved. Furthermore, NALED administered the website for the ongoing project rather than the government; while interviewees mentioned it as a potential substitute for Adminhack, it cannot be considered as a government's tool for proactive interaction with the stakeholders. Therefore, the IRM researcher assessed the change in government practice for civic participation as marginal, as there are no mechanisms to ensure institutional responsiveness to initiatives submitted by stakeholders and the focus has largely been on entrepreneurship issues. Thus, there are limited opportunities for the public to influence decision making.
Shifting the focus from 'Adminhack' to new portals could send a message that continuity and commitment is lacking, which may result in lower trust among end users. Therefore, there is a risk that people will be less motivated to engage because of uncertainty that is will result in any change. The possibility of several different portals with similar goals and target groups running concurrently may also confuse end users and create the impression of inconsistency, despite notionally increasing the government's reach. As these portals are outside of the scope of the OGP commitments, the PPS could consider consolidating them in a single, central portal for collecting initiatives from a range of stakeholders, including citizens.
Finally, the PPS lacks mechanisms to oblige institutions to consider the initiatives, so success largely relies on a case-by-case basis. Government bodies have sometimes been unresponsive or provided rather vague answers. XX[Note23: Ninoslav Kekic, Public Policy Secretariat, interview with IRM Researcher, 6 September 2018.]XXThis attitude can create additional discouragement for initiators and limit the openness of the government.
At the time of writing this report, the next Action Plan had not been published. Any future commitments that build on this one could be better streamlined and more focused on PPS initiatives that engage the public and the private sector in ways that ensure continuity and build trust. For example, a future commitment could establish accountability mechanisms for public authorities to respond and act on public proposals, which would add relevance to public accountability (which Serbia's current Action Plan lacks).
Increasing transparency and participation in parliament
RS0042, 2018, Civic Space
Publishing Budget Law
RS0028, 2018, E-Government
e-calendar for financing civil society
RS0029, 2018, E-Government
publish data on environmental protection funds
RS0030, 2018, Capacity Building
opening data for public calls for media development
RS0031, 2018, E-Government
open data reports on CSOs
RS0032, 2018, E-Government
amending media registration bylaws
RS0033, 2018, E-Government
Assistance with and monitoring of adoption of LAP
RS0034, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Updating of electoral roll
RS0035, 2018, E-Government
RS0036, 2018, E-Government
RS0037, 2018, E-Government
Improving proactive transparency – Information Booklet
RS0038, 2018, E-Government
Access to Information Law
RS0039, 2018, Capacity Building
cooperation with CSOs on regulations
RS0040, 2018, Capacity Building
RS0041, 2018, E-Government
Develop a Model of Job Description or Part of Job Description of an Officer Responsible for Cooperation with Civil Society in Local Administration
RS0014, 2016, Capacity Building
Organise Trainings for Public Administration Officers in Connection with the Application of the Guidelines on Inclusion of Civil Society Organisations in the Process of Passing Regulations
RS0015, 2016, Capacity Building
Organise Trainings for CSO in Connection with Application of the Guidelines on Inclusion of Civil Society Organisations in the Process of Passing Regulations
RS0016, 2016, Capacity Building
Improve the System for Collecting Initiatives from Citizens and Businesses
RS0017, 2016, Capacity Building
Introducing Standards for Civic Participation in the Public Policy Management System
RS0018, 2016, Capacity Building
Improving Proactive Transparency – Information Booklet
RS0019, 2016, Capacity Building
Amendments to the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance
RS0020, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
Development of an Open Data Portal
RS0021, 2016, Capacity Building
Draft a Bylaw Based on the Guidelines for Evaluation of Websites
RS0022, 2016, Capacity Building
Improve the Institute of Public Hearing in the Drafting of Laws
RS0023, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
Development of a Uniform Methodology for Planning, Monitoring and Performance Evaluation of Programmes and Projects Implemented by Civil Society Organisations and Monitoring the Spending of Allocated Funds
RS0024, 2016, Capacity Building
Amend the Regulation on Funds to Support Programmes or Missing Amount of Funds for Programmes of Public Interest Implemented by Associations
RS0025, 2016, Capacity Building
Enactment of a Law on Electronic Documents, Electronic Identification and Trusted Services in Electronic Business
RS0026, 2016, Capacity Building
Establish a Single Public Register of Administrative Procedures and Other Conditions for Pursuing a Business Activity
RS0027, 2016, Capacity Building
Transparency in Monitoring Budget Expenditures
RS0001, 2014, Capacity Building
Law on Financing Political Activities
RS0002, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
Transparent Public Procurement Procedures
RS0003, 2014, Open Contracting and Procurement
Transparent Financing of Civil Society Organizations
RS0004, 2014, Civic Space
Extending and Clarifying Responsibilities of the Anti-Corruption Agency
RS0005, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Whistleblower Protection Trainings and Campaigns
RS0006, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
Draft Law Regulating Inspections in Public Administration
RS0007, 2014, Audits and Controls
e-Governmental Portal Awareness and Mobile Application
RS0008, 2014, E-Government
Public Administration Website Harmonization and Amendments to the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance
RS0009, 2014, E-Government
New Technologies to Improve Citizen Services
RS0010, 2014, E-Government
Cooperation with Civil Society Organizations in Public Policymaking
RS0011, 2014, Civic Space
Citizen Participation in Local Government Affairs
RS0012, 2014, Public Participation
Civil Society Participation in Monitoring the Public Administration (PAR) Strategy
RS0013, 2014, Audits and Controls