OGP Local – End-of-Commitment Assessment Form

The End-of-commitment Assessment seeks to provide an appraisal of the results of a commitment once it has been completed as well as lessons from its implementation. This assessment must be submitted one (1) month after the complete implementation of a commitment. You can find further details about the evaluation template in the OGP Local Handbook section 3.5.2.
General Instructions
Please complete each field and provide the necessary evidence to back your responses. See Annex 5 of the OGP Local Handbook and the IRM-in-a-Box for a detailed explanation of what is considered as evidence for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
Name of Evaluator(Required)
Please write your name.
Email(Required)
Please provide your email.
Select the commitment you are going to assess
Member
Action plan
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Member Name
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Action Plan Title
Commitment
Title
Action
Problem
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Commitment ID

Section 1.
Commitment completion
1.1 What was the overall level of progress in the commitment implementation at the time of this assessment?(Required)
For further reference see the IRM in a Box section 3.2.1.1.
Click for a quick tip! You should assess whether the activities were implemented and to what extent, based on impartial facts that are objectively verifiable.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:(Required)
Provide evidence that supports and justifies your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

1.2 Describe the main external or internal factors that impacted implementation of this commitment and how they were addressed (or not).

1.3 Was the commitment implemented as originally planned?
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Provide evidence for your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

Section 2.
Did it open government?
Select the immediate result that applies to this commitment and degree of change.
For further guidance on how to answer the following questions see the IRM in a Box section 3.2.1.2.
2.1.1. - Did the government disclose more information; improve the quality of the information (new or existing); improve the value of the information; improve the channels to disclose or request information or improve accessibility to information?
2.1.1 Did the government:(Required)
- disclose more information,
- improve the quality of the information (new or existing),
- improve the value of the information,
- improve the channels to disclose or request information or
- improve accessibility to information?
If the commitment did not result in any of the above, select Not Applicable as your answer and go to the next question.
Degree of result:
Explanation: In narrative form, what has been the impact on people or practice.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

2.1.2. - Did the government create new opportunities to seek feedback from citizens/enable participation inform or influence decisions; improve existing channels or spaces to seek feedback from citizens/enable participation/ inform or influence decisions; create or improve capabilities in the government or the public aimed to improve how the government seeks feedback from citizens/enables participation/ or allows for the public to inform or influence decisions?
2.1.2 Did the government:(Required)
- create new opportunities to seek feedback from citizens/enable participation
- inform or influence decisions;
- improve existing channels or spaces to seek feedback from citizens/enable participation/ inform or influence decisions;
- create or improve capabilities in the government or the public aimed to improve how the government seeks feedback from citizens/enables participation/ or allows for the public to inform or influence decisions?
If the commitment did not result in any of the above, select Not Applicable as your answer and go to the next question.
Degree of result:
Explanation: In narrative form, what has been the impact on people or practice.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

2.1.3 Did the government create or improve channels, opportunities or capabilities to hold officials answerable to their actions?(Required)
If the commitment did not result in any of the above, select Not Applicable as your answer and go to the next question.
Degree of result:
Explanation: In narrative form, what has been the impact on people or practice.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

2.1.4 Other Results
Did the commitment achieve other results not capture above? If so, please describe any relevant results. If not, select Not Applicable as you answer and go to the next question.
Degree of result:
Explanation: In narrative form, what has been the impact on people or practice.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 3.

2.2 Did the commitment address the public policy problem that it intended to address as described in the action plan?
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Provide evidence for your answer:
Max. file size: 100 MB.

Section 3.
Lessons from
implementation
3. Provide at least one lesson or reflection relating to the implementation of this commitment. It can be the identification of key barriers to implementation, an unexpected help/hindrance, recommendations for future commitments, or if the commitment should be taken forward to the next action plan.

This site uses cookies.