Regional Open Government Labs (DE0016)
What is the public problem that the commitment will address?
Local administrations are faced with a broad range of challenges arising from structural
change, demographic change, the digital transformation, climate change, migration,
conflicting regional interests (e.g. regarding construction and infrastructure projects),
anti-democratic trends, and other issues. Civil society demands transparency, codetermination and active participation. Sometimes there are also conflicting interests
between authorities and civil society, between civil society and business, and within civil
What is the commitment?
The BMI will support up to 16 Regional Open Government Labs (regOGL) throughout Germany.
Regional Open Government Labs will provide a framework for cooperation between local
administrations, local politics and civil society, with the participation of academia and local
businesses where appropriate. The initiative for the regOGLs is to arise from the regions
where they are to be located.
How will the commitment contribute to solving the public problem?
Regional lab work will be carried out with a thematic objective and milestone planning
determined by the labs themselves. The sponsors of the Open Government Labs will ensure
systematic reflection on their experiences and findings, which will be discussed within the
network of Open Government Labs and generalised for broader application.
Why is this commitment relevant to OGP values?
In the regOGLs, the transparency and accountability of government will be actively
implemented. Civil society will be directly involved in the regOGLs. The main purposes of
the lab’s work are the systematic inclusion of civil society in the decision-making processes
of local government and the harnessing of the region’s societal innovative potential for the
sake of regional development. This will include a variety of participatory elements. Accompanying this, the commitment aims to foster public relations work that is commensurate with
the challenge of open administrative action. The regOGLs are tied directly to the findings of
the project “Modellkommune Open Government” (Open Government Pilot Community) and
are a way of applying these findings more widely.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
1. Regional Open Government Labs
“The BMI will support up to 16 Regional Open Government Labs (regOGL) throughout Germany. Regional Open Government Labs will provide a framework for cooperation between local administrations, local politics and civil society, with the participation of academia and local businesses where appropriate. The initiative for the regOGLs is to arise from the regions where they are to be located.”
1.1. Application phase and selection of up to 16 regOGLs
1.2. Assignment of the following tasks to a research capacity: Ensuring exchange among the regOGLs; generalizing the findings; managing public relations work
1.3. Developing and establishing the labs’ work
1.4. Preparing interim conclusions for second NAP OGP and regional conference
1.5. Preparing outcome documents and presenting at final conference
Editorial Note: For the complete text of this commitment, please see Germany’s action plan at: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Germany_Action-Plan_2019-2021_EN.pdf.
A deeper integration of open government in Germany requires a further cultural change inside the public administrative and political system.  Open government is often not recognized as a strategic investment and it can take a backseat to values of efficiency and effectiveness inside the administration.  This is also the case at regional and local levels.  For example, a survey of 600 local administrations perceive a significant gap between the potential relevance of open government and the actual degree of realizing the concept in practice. 
This commitment seeks to catalyze this cultural change by establishing up to 16 regional open government laboratories (regOGLs). The regOGLs will facilitate practical open government initiatives and co-creation between civil society and local governments.
The process of establishing the regOGLs will be conducted in a participatory manner. Local governments, civil society stakeholders, and the business sector will jointly develop and propose initiatives to be considered for support by the regOGLs. Both government bodies as well as civil society groups can initiate applications and the quality of civil society-government cooperation envisaged for the project was the most important selection criteria with a weight of 20%.  The commitment is therefore relevant to the OGP value of civic participation. The concrete work programs and activities for each individual lab will only be determined during commitment implementation.
Existing open government initiatives inside local administrations contain limited mechanisms for co-creation. A prior pilot initiative, on which regOGL directly builds, contained projects that were primarily driven by the local administrations. These projects experienced varying and often gradually decreasing degrees of buy-in and engagement over time by nongovernmental stakeholders.
The extent to which the new regOGLs promote a culture of participation and openness at the local level can only be determined when the specific activities that will receive support have been selected.
The prescribed process for selecting the activities puts a clear focus on co-creation, which could facilitate an important shift in administrative practice and culture. The regOGL initiative currently enjoys a high level of political visibility, as it has been explicitly mentioned in the top-level coalition agreement between the governing parties.  At the same time, the regOGLs are a small-scale pilot initiative that will only fund up to 16 projects.
Special regard for including groups in new engagement formats,  although not explicitly recognized in the commitment, could enhance their impact if mainstreamed into the programming.  Similarly, linking the piloting of the regOGLs to actionable and monitorable targets could help strengthen their results.
Overall, the new regOGLs could lead to minor but positive improvements in cooperation and openness in local administration, especially in changing the culture of the administration for engaging civil society in decision-making and agenda-setting for priority programs. The commitment has the potential to establish good examples and templates for genuine partnerships between local administrations and civil society around open government themes.  Furthermore, if successfully carried out, the regOGLs could be expanded to other local administrations in the country.
Participatory Development of Research and Innovation Policy
DE0022, 2019, Public Participation
Participatory Creation of Regulatory Policy
DE0023, 2019, Open Regulations
Digital Strategy Pilot for Rural Regions
DE0024, 2019, Public Service Delivery
Open Government in North Rhine-Westphalia
DE0025, 2019, Access to Information
Policy Co-Creation in North Rhine-Westphalia
DE0026, 2019, Land Rights and Spatial Planning
Data Sovereignty in North Rhine-Westphalia
DE0027, 2019, Access to Information
Open Government Portal in Saxony
DE0028, 2019, E-Government
Open-Source Software in Public Administrations in Schleswig-Holstein
DE0029, 2019, Subnational
Regional Open Government Labs
DE0016, 2019, Public Participation
Civil Society Consulation on Foreign Policy
Create Youth Strategy
DE0018, 2019, Marginalized Communities
Craete Federal Agency for Digital Innovation
Transparency and Participation in International Aid
DE0020, 2019, Access to Information
Strengthen and Socialize Open Data Policy
DE0021, 2019, Access to Information
Conditions for OGP Participation
Open Data in Administrative Practice
DE0002, 2017, Access to Information
Open Data Environment
DE0003, 2017, Access to Information
Access to Spatial Data
DE0004, 2017, Access to Information
Financial Transparency - EITI Standard
DE0005, 2017, Access to Information
Transparency in Development Policy
DE0006, 2017, Access to Information
Open Data for Intelligent Mobility
DE0007, 2017, Access to Information
Citizen Participation in Environmental Policy and Urban Development
DE0008, 2017, Capacity Building
Electronic Procedures for Family Benefits
DE0009, 2017, E-Government
Knowledge Network for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex People
DE0010, 2017, E-Government
Local Alliances for Family Initiative
DE0011, 2017, Public Participation
Share of Women and Men in Leadership Positions, Private and Private Sectors
DE0012, 2017, E-Government
Open Access to Academic Literature
DE0013, 2017, E-Government
Science Year 2018
DE0014, 2017, Public Participation
Federal Competition “Living Together Hand in Hand”
DE0015, 2017, Citizenship & Immigration