Monitoring of Openness of Government Institutions in the Processes of Policy Making and Law Drafting "Mirror of the Government: Public Participation in the Process of Law Drafting" Annual Report – Assessment Of: (MK0040)
Overview
At-a-Glance
Action Plan: Macedonia, Second Action Plan, 2014-16
Action Plan Cycle: 2014
Status: Inactive
Institutions
Lead Institution: General Secretariat of the Government
Support Institution(s): Ministry of Information Society and Administration and civil society organizations
Policy Areas
Public ParticipationIRM Review
IRM Report: Macedonia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016
Starred: No
Early Results: Marginal
Design i
Verifiable: Yes
Relevant to OGP Values: Access to Information Civic Participation , Public Accountability
Implementation i
Description
Monitoring of openness of government institutions in the processes of policy making and law drafting "Mirror of the Government: public participation in the process of law drafting" Annual Report – assessment of:
IRM End of Term Status Summary
II. Participation: Participatory Policymaking
Commitment 1.4 Assessing Impact of Government Mirror
Commitment Text: 1.4. Monitoring of openness of government institutions in the processes of policy making [...].
Commitment 1.7 Use of e-democracy by Stakeholders
Commitment Text: 1.7. Greater public awareness and use of participatory policy making through the internet portal e-democracy [...].
Commitment 1.8 Civil Society Council (✪) (✪)
Commitment Text: 1.8. Establishing of an advisory body to […] encourage the development of the civil society, composed of […] the Government, administrative bodies and civil society organisations.
Commitment 1.9 Code of Good Practice
Commitment Text: 1.9. Improved implementation of the Code of Good Practice for the participation of civil society in the policy making process [...].
Commitment 1.10 Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society
Commitment Text: .. 1.10. Implementation of the measures from the Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society (2012-2017) and timely updates on the website of the Department for Cooperation with NGOs [http://www.nvosorabotka.gov.mk].
Commitment 7.2 Publication of Citizens’ Assessment of Public Services
Commitment Text: 7.2. Publication of the results of using ENER – “Mirror of the Government.”
Responsible institution(s): General Secretariat of the Government
Supporting institution(s): Ministry of Information Society and Administration (MISA) and CSOs[Note 14: The full list of CSOs named as supporting institutions includes Macedonian Center for International Cooperation, Center for International Cooperation, Center for Research and Policy Making, Center for Change Management, Eco-conscious, Institute for Community Development, IRES, Biosphere- Bitola, Bujrum- Tetovo, Center for Rural Development-Kumanovo, Center for European Development and Integration-Bitola (CERI), Institute for Economic Strategies and International Relations Ohrid, and Polio Plus.]
Start Date: 1/1/2014 ......... .............. End Date: ongoing
Editorial Note: Commitment 1.8 is a starred commitment, because it is measurable, clearly relevant to OGP values as written, of transformative potential impact, and was substantially or completely implemented.
Commitment aim
The commitments under this cluster sought to enhance the policy and institutional framework for increased public involvement in the policy making process. They also aimed to strengthen some of the measures from the Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society.[Note 15: The Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society (2012-2017) is the second national strategy that envisages commitments by the government to implement measures that will promote, improve, and ensure active civic participation in decision making. The full text of the strategy is accessible at: http://bit.ly/2jx8eBz.] Those measures focused on reporting mechanisms used to assess the implementation of the Code of Good Practice for Participation of Civil Society Sector in Policy Creation,[Note 16: The code was a non-buiding guiding document addopted by the Government in 2011. It prescribes best practices, forms, and ways of ensuring participation of civil society in the policy making of government bodies. The text can be accessed [in Macedonian] at: http://bit.ly/2jz7dZ9.] the Strategy itself, and government openness. One of the commitments pledged to establish the Civil Society Council, one of the most important measures promoted by civil society in 2012.
Status
Midterm
Commitment 1.4: Limited
Commitment 1.7: Limited
Commitment 1.8: Limited
Commitment 1.9: Limited
Commitment 1.10: Limited
Commitment 7.2: Not started
The second commitment (1.7) was designed to promote the e-democracy portal by encouraging and monitoring its use. Limited progress was made during the first year of implementation, and stakeholders continue to underutilize the portal. The latest blog or forum post dates from 2015 and, apart from MISA and OGP-related documents, only one additional document has been added by another public institution.
The third commitment (1.8) referred to the establishment of an advisory council to encourage the development of civil society. The government made little progress on this commitment in the first year by presenting a draft decision to regulate the process for the composition, election, and competence of the council.[Note 17: The first draft was presented in December 2014, and a second in February 2015. Civil society submitted substantial comments, and the process was stalled after February. The drafts, comparison between them, and summary comments can be found [in Macedonian] at: http://bit.ly/2k04HbB. ] CSOs raised serious concerns and comments during two public consultations, and submitted written comments. The main concerns were the majority of government representatives, the process of appointing civil society representatives, and the areas of competence.
The fourth commitment (1.9) concerned the regular work of the Unit for Cooperation with Civil Society within the General Secretariat, the publication of the analysis of the Code of Good Practice,[Note 18: In Macedonian, available at: http://bit.ly/1KProUW. ] and a public call for contributions to the preparation of the Annual Work Program of the government.[Note 19: http://nvosorabotka.gov.mk/, published in September 2014.] The IRM researcher found limited progress on this commitment. Only seven proposals were received from civil society in 2015. These included recommendations for the government’s Annual Work Program. The General Secretariat published an abbreviated assessment of the implementation of the Code of Good Practice, based on the responses from 15 state institutions. The survey received a 20% response rate.[Note 20: In the introduction, the report states that it is published as a result of a conclusion the government adopted in its session held on 23 June 2016. This conclusion requested regular reports on the progress of cooperation with civil society every six months. Since the report falls outside the period covered by this report, it will be analyzed in the next IRM assessment.]
For more information, please see the 2014-2016 IRM midterm report on Macedonia.
End of term
Commitment 1.4: Completed
Commitment 1.7: Limited
Commitment 1.8: Completed
Commitment 1.9: Limited
Commitment 1.10: Limited
Commitment 7.2: Not started
The government’s end of term self-assessment report and the IRM researcher’s desk and media review and interviews showed no further progress on the implementation of commitments 1.9, 1.10, and 7.2. Similarly, there was no progress on the second commitment (1.7), as the IRM review of the portal found no evidence of its use, except by MISA.[Note 21: The use of MISA is limited to OGP related activities only. ] The use of the portal was monitored under the previous national action plan; its use actually declined in 2013 and 2014. No additional promotional activities were conducted during the reported period,[Note 22: For comparison, when it was launched in 2011 and 2012, 18 promotional and educational events were organized by MISA. ] although a total of 32 civil servants attended one-day trainings in 2015 and 2016 on the introduction to e-government. The use of e-democracy by stakeholders will continue to be limited, due to the lack of awareness, the absence of documents on the platform, and the fact that no substantial discussions are taking place on the platform.
Commitment 1.4 was completed when the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation published and promoted the annual monitoring report in May 2016.[Note 23: Marija Sazdevski, Borjan Gjuzelov, and Natasa Ivanoska, “Mirror of the Government 2015: Participation of the Public in the Processes of Preparation of Laws” (Skopje: MCIC, 2016), available at: http://bit.ly/2jKTTil.] The report noted a deterioration in government openness, compared to 2014. The 2016 results were closer to the monitoring results of 2012, the year the country joined OGP.
Regarding the establishment of the Civil Society Council (commitment 1.8), the government adopted the decision to establish the council in May 2016.[Note 24: Official Gazette, “Decision for Establishing a Council for Cooperation and Development of Civil Society” (No. 98/2016), 17 May 2016.] The IRM researcher has, thus, determined that this commitment was completed. This is a starred commitment by OGP standards, since it had a transformative impact, was specific enough, related to OGP values, and was completed in the second year of implementation. It is worth mentioning that the decision to establish the council came as a surprise for many civil society organisations, as they believed it departed from the current standards for cooperation. Their main concerns were the composition of the Council (not on equal footing), the criteria for appointing its members, and the procedure for selecting CSO representatives.[Note 25: Document submitted by MCIC and Balkan Civil Society Development Network, available at: http://bit.ly/2k04HbB [In Macedonian].] The EU Delegation facilitated consultations between the government and civil society on 26 May 2016. Eighty-nine of the most prominent CSOs urged the government to withdraw the decision, and effectively boycotted the process.[Note 26: Open letter to the Government, signed by 89 CSOs, available at: http://bit.ly/2cqrJVE [in Macedonian].] CSOs argued that the process for selecting their representatives was not clear, the time frame was very limited, and no mechanisms for oversight of the process were provided. Still, this had no impact and, on 7 July 2016, the government appointed representatives who submitted applications with many CSO endorsements. Regardless, the IRM researcher found no evidence[Note 27: http://www.nvosorabotka.gov.mk.] that government members had been appointed, or that the council was functional at the time of the writing of this report.
The IRM researcher also could not find evidence of progress on the implementation of commitments 1.9 and 1.10. The February 2016 annual report on the implementation of the Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society (the Code of Good Practice is one of the targets) noted limited progress.[Note 28: General Secretariat, “Report from the Implementation of the Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society Sector in 2015”, (Skopje: 2016), available at: http://bit.ly/2cIUxfy [In Macedonian].] An independent assessment of the cooperation, published in 2016, pointed to the lack of political will for substantial cooperation. The assessment concluded that the dialogue between government and civil society was underdeveloped, and the situation and involvement of civil society organisations in policy making and law drafting had worsened.[Note 29: Simona Ognenovska, “Report on the Enabling Environment for Civil Society in Macedonia in 2015,” (Skopje: MCIC, 2016).]
It further revealed that only 10% of the public funds disbursed to civil society had been allocated through a transparent public call.[Note 30: Macedonian Center for International Cooperation, Direct Budget Financing for Civil Society Organization: Basic Overview, November 2016.] Improving transparency of public funding is the main objective of the Code of Good Practice.
Did it open government?
Access to information: Did not change
Civic participation: Worsened
Public accountability: Did not change
The Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society (2012-2017) contained measures that potentially could have transformed the work of the government, with increased public participation. This commitment sought to enhance some of the key measures, such as the establishment of a Council for Cooperation, which was only an option under the strategy.
However, most of the commitments were limited in their implementation and, therefore, did not change government practice. The European Commission also noted unwillingness on the part of government to engage with CSOs.[Note 31: EC, Annual Progress Report for 2016, 9.] The assessment produced under commitment 1.4 concluded that policy making inside government institutions was more closed; less information was being made available, time frames for consultations were decreasing significantly, and fewer efforts were made to proactively engage and consult stakeholders.[Note 32: Ibid., endnote 8.] Additionally, the controversy surrounding the establishment of the Council jeopardised its credibility and effectiveness. In short, this cluster did not change government practice vis-a-vis civil society, while the process for establishing the Council (which could potentially provide an opportunity for public participation) marred its independence and worsened the situation.
The IRM researcher believes it is important to monitor the work of the Council in the future to address the implementation of the commitment and its effects regarding OGP values.
Carried forward?
The new national action plan seeks to bolster open government, with the addition of three new commitments:
• The establishment of the Council is scheduled for the first six months. The IRM researcher recommends an extensive revision of the Council’s function, with special consideration for the concerns raised by CSOs in Macedonia. This would bolster the Council’s public credibility;
• The improvement of the Code of Good Practice remains in the new action plan. The new wording emphasises civic participation in the design of the government’s annual work plan. However, this is only a general strategic priority plan that lacks operationalisation. Therefore, focusing on the key aspects of the Code of Good Practices (such as transparency in government funds to CSOs) would be crucial to opening the government further;
• A new Strategy for Cooperation with Civil Society (2018-2020) is envisioned. The quality of the strategy will depend on how it is adopted, although this alone will not be sufficient for its implementation. The current strategy was developed in a very collaborative manner, and is strongly supported by the government and CSOs. However, the implementation of the strategy is very limited. The IRM researcher believes an independent assessment of the strategy’s implementation, as well as a strong and independent monitoring mechanism would be beneficial. The role and composition of the new Council is key. Appropriate resources (financial and human) should be allocated for the implementation of the strategy. This would send a strong signal that the political will for dialogue and cooperation does exist indeed.
The e-democracy portal was not carried forward. During this IRM review, the portal was not functional at all times and underutilized. The idea was to have one central platform for participation (i.e., ENER), hence, the exclusion of the ineffective e-democracy portal is in line with IRM recommendations.
Commitments
-
Awareness-Raising About Access to Information Rights
MK0121, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Public Access to Central Register of the Republic of Macedonia
MK0122, 2018, Beneficial Ownership
-
Mapping Homeless and Socially Endangered Families and Individuals
MK0123, 2018, E-Government
-
Monitoring Property Status of Elected and Appointed Officials
MK0124, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Assessment of Anti-Corruption Legislation
MK0125, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Open Treasury
MK0126, 2018, E-Government
-
Publishing Procurement Information
MK0127, 2018, E-Government
-
Health Sector Transparency and Establish a Cost Impact Assessment Mechanism
MK0128, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Employment Program Transparency and Impact Assessment Mechanism
MK0129, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Cataloging Data Sets in State Institutions
MK0130, 2018, E-Government
-
Regional Open Data Initiatives
MK0131, 2018, Open Data
-
Financial Transparency Tools
MK0132, 2018, E-Government
-
Improvement in Local Public Service Delivery
MK0133, 2018, Fiscal Transparency
-
Inclusive Local Decision-Making
MK0134, 2018, Gender
-
To Resilient Skopje Via Data Availability
MK0135, 2018, Infrastructure & Transport
-
Access to Justice Development
MK0136, 2018, Justice
-
Improving Access to Justice for Marginalized Groups of Citizens
MK0137, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Awareness-Raisinga About Climate Change
MK0138, 2018, Environment and Climate
-
National Assembly Capacity-Building
MK0139, 2018, Capacity Building
-
Increasing the Financial Transparency of the Assembly of RM
MK0140, 2018, Fiscal Transparency
-
Parliamentary TV Channel
MK0141, 2018, E-Government
-
Citizen Participation in Assembly
MK0142, 2018, E-Government
-
#N/A
MK0143, 2018, Legislature
-
Creation of Open Data Standards
MK0089, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
-
Improvement of the Open Data Platform and Its Approximation to the Citizens
MK0090, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Rising Awareness of Open Data
MK0091, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Cataloging and Categorization of Data Sets Held by State Institutions
MK0092, 2016, E-Government
-
Open Data Linking on the State Institutions’ Portals
MK0093, 2016, E-Government
-
Improvement and Facilitation of the Access to Information
MK0094, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Implementation of the Law on Whistle-Blower Protection and Raising the Awareness for Whistle-Blowing
MK0095, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Open Data on Property Status of Elected and Appointed Persons
MK0096, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Promotion of Integrity, Transparency and Accountability on Local Level and Monitoring the Progress
MK0097, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Promotion of Cooperation and Increased Proactivity in the Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interests
MK0098, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Open Budget Initiative
MK0099, 2016, Fiscal Transparency
-
Open Data on Health Programs
MK0100, 2016, Fiscal Transparency
-
Creating a Legal Obligation for the Contracting Authorities for Mandatory Publication of Information Regarding the Public Procurement Contracts on Their Websites
MK0101, 2016, Fiscal Transparency
-
Involving Representatives of Associations and Foundations, As Well As Other Civil Society Organizations, in Transparent and Objective Manner in Sector Working Groups for Planning and Programming of IPA 2
MK0102, 2016, Public Participation
-
Publication of Data on Signed Contracts and Received Assistance Through Infrastructure Development Program (Orio) Netherlands
MK0103, 2016, Aid
-
Introduction of a Publicly Accessible Register of Concession Contracts
MK0104, 2016, E-Government
-
Increased Budgetary Fund Benefits in Preventive and Curative Health Protection for Citizens
MK0105, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Publication of Data on Planned and Realized Domestic and Foreign Assistance for Rural Development and Agriculture on a Quarterly Basis
MK0106, 2016, Aid
-
Determination of Data on State Assistance to Be Published and Their Publication
MK0107, 2016, Aid
-
Developing Standards for Transparency and Open Data on Local Level
MK0108, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Establishment of New Tools to Improve Financial Transparency and Accountability of Local Self-Government Units
MK0109, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Improvement of the Institutional Consultation Mechanism at the Local Level
MK0110, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Capacity Strengthening for Cooperation Between the Local Self-Government Units and Civil Organizations
MK0111, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Monitoring and Evaluation of Service Quality at the Local Level
MK0112, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Improvement of the Local Level Social Services
MK0113, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Improvement of Disabled People Social Inclusion at the Local Level
MK0114, 2016, E-Government
-
Improvement of the Local Level Communal Services
MK0115, 2016, Capacity Building
-
More Information for the Citizens on the Ombudsman Institution
MK0116, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Favorable Legal Environment for Social Contracts
MK0117, 2016, Civic Space
-
Developing Climate Policies at National Level in a Transparent and Participatory Manner
MK0118, 2016, Environment and Climate
-
Open Data on Climate Change at National and Local Level
MK0119, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Ensuring Private Sector Accountability and Involvement in National Climate Change Action
MK0120, 2016, E-Government
-
Advancement of the Consultation Process with Stakeholders in the Policy Creating Process
MK0087, 2016, E-Government
-
Cooperation Advancement with the Civil Sector
MK0088, 2016, Capacity Building
-
Enhancement of the ENER Portal and Optimization of the Process of Public Consultation
MK0036, 2014, E-Government
-
Implementation of the Measures from the Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society (2012-2017)
MK0037, 2014, E-Government
-
Strengthening the Rules for Work and Use of ENER
MK0038, 2014, E-Government
-
Publication of the Results of Using ENER - " Mirror of the Government "
MK0039, 2014, E-Government
-
Monitoring of Openness of Government Institutions in the Processes of Policy Making and Law Drafting "Mirror of the Government: Public Participation in the Process of Law Drafting" Annual Report – Assessment Of:
MK0040, 2014, Public Participation
-
Capacity Building of Civil Society Organizations to Monitor the Implementation of Policies
MK0041, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Raising the Awareness About the Benefits of Open Government Partnership:
MK0042, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Greater Public Awareness and Use of Participatory Policy Making Through the Internet Portal e-Democracy by the Institutions, Companies, Chambers, Civil Society and Citizens
MK0043, 2014, E-Government
-
Establishing of an Advisory Body to Promote Cooperation, Dialogue and Encourage the Development of the Civil Society, Composed of Representatives of the Government, Administrative Bodies and Civil Society Organizations
MK0044, 2014, Public Participation
-
Improved Implementation of the Code of Good Practice for the Participation of Civil Society in the Policy Making Process
MK0045, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Open Data of the Bodies and Public Sector Institutions According to Their Technical Features Which They Create in Exercise of Their Powers That Will Be Made Available for Use
MK0046, 2014, Open Data
-
Setting of Technical Standards for the Data Format and the Manner of Its Publication Prescribed by the Minister of Information Society and Administration.
MK0047, 2014, Open Data
-
Establishing a Central Catalog of Public Sector Data Published for Use Based on a Catalog of Data from the Bodies and the Institutions of the Public Sector Www.Otvorenipodatoci.Gov.Mk (Opendata.Gov.Mk)
MK0048, 2014, E-Government
-
Establishing a Database for the Contact Person in the Bodies and Institutions of the Public Sector Where a Contact Person Shall Be Appointed Responsible for the Technical Adaptation and Publishing of Data for Use, Their Publication on the Website of the Authority and Responsibilities for the Accuracy of the Catalog Data Www.Opendata.Gov.Mk.
MK0049, 2014, Open Data
-
Introducing the Possibility for Submission of a Request by the Interested Parties for New Datasets for Use.
MK0050, 2014, Open Data
-
Establishing a Platform for Data Mashing (Pilot 11 Institutions)
MK0051, 2014, E-Government
-
Trainings for Implementation of the Law on Use of Data from the Public Sector
MK0052, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Raising Public Awareness About the Right to Free Access to Public Information Through the Created and Conducted Media Presentations and Educational Campaign
MK0053, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Establishing of Inter-Sector Working Group for Determining the Compliance with the Convention of the Council of Europe for Access to Public Documents and Setting National Legal Requirements for Accession to the Convention
MK0054, 2014, Public Participation
-
Educating Officers and Officials at the Information Holders (Commission for Protection of the Right to Free Access to Public Information)
MK0055, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Making a New Web Site of the Commission (Ministry of Information Society and Administration)
MK0056, 2014, E-Government
-
Regular Posting and Updating the List of Information Holders
MK0057, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Availability of All Public Information on the Web Sites of the Information Holders (All Holders)
MK0058, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Improving the Financial and Human Resources of the Commission (Ministry of Finance, the Commission for Protection of the Right to Free Access to Public Information and the Ministry of Information Society and Administration)
MK0059, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Increasing the Cooperation of the Commission with Associations and Foundations and Municipalities in RM Through Memorandum of Cooperation
MK0060, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Publishing Information About Budget and Program Implementation of Health Budgets, with Particular Focus on the Budgetary and Financial Implementation of Preventive Programs of the Ministry of Health, Obtained Through a Procedure of Access to Public Information Www.Esem.Org.Mk
MK0061, 2014, E-Government
-
Amending the Law on Free Access to Public Information (Ministry of Justice)
MK0062, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
-
Adoption of Amendments to the Law on Prevention of Corruption in the Direction Of:
MK0063, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Implementation of Activities to Raise Awareness of Public Administration and Citizens to Report Corruption and Other Unlawful and Impermissible Actions
MK0064, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Introducing Guidelines to the Integrity System and Their Further Piloting in the Municipalities and Central Level Institutions
MK0065, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Defining a Methodology for Assessing the Risks of Corruption by Updating the Concept of Integrity
MK0066, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Developing a Methodology for Monitoring the Progress of Implementation of Integrity Systems (Integrity Index) for Local Self Governments
MK0067, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Developing a Methodology for Monitoring Progress in Implementation of Integrity Systems by the Civil Society (Through Tools for Social Responsibility)
MK0068, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Continuously Promote the Use of It Tools for Social Responsibility in the Municipalities and Other Institutions
MK0069, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Building the Capacity of Civil Society Organizations to Monitor Anti-Corruption Practices At the Local Level Through Research and a LOTOS Study
MK0070, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
-
Defining the Scope of the Elected and Appointed Persons Who Are Obliged to Submit Declarations of Assets and Interests Statement - Preparation of the Register
MK0071, 2014, Asset Disclosure
-
Implementation of the Open Budget Initiative
MK0072, 2014, Fiscal Transparency
-
Public Procurement
MK0073, 2014, Open Contracting and Procurement
-
Foreign Aid and Foreign Investment
MK0074, 2014, Aid
-
Developing Capacities at Local Level for the Implementation of Mechanisms for Proactive Communication with Citizens
MK0075, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Establish an Electronic Platform (Dashboard) with Indicators for the Budget and Delivery of Local Services
MK0076, 2014, E-Government
-
Improving Local Services Through Direct Collaboration with Citizens
MK0077, 2014, Public Participation
-
Transforming the Part of Local Services in e- Services
MK0078, 2014, E-Government
-
Participatory Policy Making at the Local Level- Obligatory Consultations with Citizens in Drafting/Amending of the Most Important Acts and Documents in the Local Government (Budget, Strategies, Urban Plans, Statute)
MK0079, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
-
Increasing Accountability and Promoting the Concept of Informed Consumers and Citizens, Service Users and Rights Through:
MK0080, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Publication of the Results of the Projects for Evaluation of Public Administration
MK0081, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Inclusive Elementary and Secondary Education for Persons with Disabilities
MK0082, 2014, Education
-
Enforcement Activities of the Center for Safer Internet Action Plan in Accordance with (Inhope Macedonia)
MK0083, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Analysis of the Results Obtained in Field Research at the National Level to Implement the Program
MK0084, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Informing Women on the Rights and the Services Available to Them with the Programme
MK0085, 2014, Capacity Building
-
Increasing Responsibilities and Promote the Concept of Environmental Protection (DEM – AD Treska, Makedonski Brod and Other Stakeholders):
MK0086, 2014, Environment and Climate
-
ENER online Participatory Tool in Legislation Drafting
MK0001, 2012, Public Participation
-
Www.E-Demokratija.Gov.Mk - on Line Tool for Participatory Policy Making
MK0002, 2012, E-Government
-
Introduction of Online Petitions
MK0003, 2012,
-
Implementation of the Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society Sector
MK0004, 2012, Public Participation
-
Code of Best Practices for NGO Involvement
MK0005, 2012, Capacity Building
-
Www.Opendata.Gov.Mk
MK0006, 2012, E-Government
-
Development of Business Model for Open Data
MK0007, 2012, Open Data
-
Prioritizing Opening of Data
MK0008, 2012, Open Data
-
Use of Inter-Operable Services as Guidance in Opening Data
MK0009, 2012, Open Data
-
Plan and Monitor the Implementation of the Plans for Opening the State Institutions Information.
MK0010, 2012, Open Data
-
Analyses of the Legal Framework Enabling Open Data.
MK0011, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
-
Improving Services Through Www.Uslugi.Gov.Mk
MK0012, 2012, E-Government
-
Integration of Citizen Logs, Their Update and Publishing
MK0013, 2012, E-Government
-
‘Traffic Light’ Project for Citizens’ Evaluation of the Administration.
MK0014, 2012, Public Participation
-
Provision of the Government Services Through Cloud Computing.
MK0015, 2012, E-Government
-
Introduction of One-Off Request for the Information from the Citizens.
MK0016, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
-
Use of Harm Test. and 2. Publication of Information Gathered Through the Free Access Law
MK0017, 2012, Right to Information
-
Publication of Easy to Search Public Information.
MK0018, 2012, Right to Information
-
Ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Access to Public Documents.
MK0019, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
-
Electronic Submission of Requests for Access to Public Character Information.
MK0020, 2012, E-Government
-
Training of Access to Information Officers.
MK0021, 2012, E-Government
-
Identification of Low Interest Areas for Business Investments. 2.Publication of Research.
MK0022, 2012, Education
-
Scientific and Research Cooperation Through the Internet.
MK0023, 2012, E-Government
-
Publication of Information from the State Statistical Office for Further Scientific Purposes.
MK0024, 2012, Education
-
Available Information About the Inspectorates
MK0025, 2012, Justice
-
Introduce Integrity Systems for Anticorruption Policies in the Public Administration.
MK0026, 2012, Capacity Building
-
Open Budget Initiative
MK0027, 2012, Fiscal Transparency
-
Public Procurements
MK0028, 2012, E-Government
-
Foreign Assistance and Foreign Investments
MK0029, 2012, Aid
-
Opening of Information by the Municipalities
MK0030, 2012, Open Data
-
Free Access to Information Training Local Self-Government Officials
MK0031, 2012, Capacity Building
-
Integrity System on Local Level.1. Established Methodology. 2. Piloting in 10 Municipalities.
MK0032, 2012, Conflicts of Interest
-
Promotion of Consumers Information in Selected Areas.
MK0033, 2012, Gender
-
Availability of Information Related To: Roads Safety, Air Quality, Safety of Workers
MK0034, 2012, E-Government
-
Public Health Information
MK0035, 2012, Health