Skip Navigation
Romania

Improve Youth Consultation and Public Participation (RO0037)

Overview

At-a-Glance

Action Plan: Romania Action Plan 2016-2018

Action Plan Cycle: 2016

Status: Inactive

Institutions

Lead Institution: Ministry of Youth and Sport (MTS)

Support Institution(s): Ministry for Public Consultations and Civic Dialogue (MCPDC); Consiliul Tineretului din România Asociația Impact Bistrița Asociația Tinerilor Bucureșteni Asociația Altium Asociația Viitorul Tinerilor

Policy Areas

Capacity Building, Local Commitments, Public Participation

IRM Review

IRM Report: Romania Mid-Term Report 2016-2018, Romania End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

Starred: No

Early Results: Did Not Change

Design i

Verifiable: No

Relevant to OGP Values: Civic Participation

Potential Impact:

Implementation i

Completion:

Description

Status quo or problem addressed by the commitment Currently, young people face numerous problems, especially at local level: - lack of local/ regional mechanisms to ensure a structured dialogue between youth and public authorities; - lack of promotion of a structured dialogue at national / regional / local level; - lack of specificity in implementation of youth related public policies. Main objective Achieve an open decision-making process in developing youth public policies at national level Brief description of commitment The commitment aims to implement a series of actions that will strengthen collaboration between public authorities, young people and organisations working with youth, to produce specifically targeted action plans, through dialogue and use of new technologies. The implemented actions and tools will lead to development of skills in both young people and public servants working in this field, contributing to an open, diverse, intercultural and connected society. OPG challenge addressed by the commitment Effectively managing public resources; Improving public services Relevance Civic participation Ambition Initiate structured dialogue for drafting and monitoring the implementation of youth related public policies, at local and county level; Setting up and operation of consultative councils for youth issues: 41 operating by the county councils, 41 operating by municipality councils, 1 operating by the General Council of the Bucharest municipality; Selection of at least 1000 benficiaries of MTS youth projects, on objective criteria and transparent methodologies, using online apps.

IRM End of Term Status Summary

8. Improve youth consultation and public participation

Commitment Text:

The commitment aims to implement a series of actions that will strengthen collaboration between public authorities, young people and organizations working with youth, to produce specifically targeted action plans, through dialogue and use of new technologies. The implemented actions and tools will lead to development of skills in both young people and public servants working in this field, contributing to an open, diverse, intercultural and connected society.

Main Objective:

Achieve an open decision-making process in developing youth public policies at national level.

Milestones:

    • Hold public consultations initiated by the National Working Group and youth workers
    • Setting up 83 local consultative councils for young people
    • Selection of at least 1000 beneficiaries of MTS youth projects, on objective criteria and transparent methodologies, using online apps.

Responsible Institution: Ministry of Youth and Sport (MTS)

Supporting Institution(s): Ministry for Public Consultations and Civic Dialogue (MCPDC); Non-government: Consiliul Tineretului din Romania, Asociatia Impact Bistrita, Asociatia Tinerilor Bucuresteni, Asociatia Altium, Asociatia Viitorul Tinerilor

Start date: 2016                                                                     End date: December 2017

Editorial Note: The commitment text is abridged. The full text can be found in the 2016–2018 OGP national action plan.

Commitment Aim

This commitment aimed to improve government engagement with youth through consultations (Milestone 1) and by increasing their participation opportunities at the local and regional level (Milestones 2 and 3).

STATUS

Midterm: Substantial

Through the EU cofunded projects Structured Dialogue and Youth Worker, several public consultations with youth and youth organizations were organized in 2016. In 2016, the Ministry of Youth and Sport implemented 22 projects at the national level, involving 1,488 participants that were selected using objective criteria and with transparent methodologies. Milestone 2 saw limited completion, as law 350/2006 did not mandate the establishment of local youth consultative councils. In December 2017, only 10 youth consultative councils were functioning in Arges, Bistrita Nasaud, Covasna, Neamt, and Suceava at the county level, and in Constanta, Targoviste, Deva, Ploiesti and Timisoara at the municipal level.

End-of-term: Substantial

According to the government’s self-assessment report, no further progress was made. [66]

Did it Open Government?

Civic participation: Did not change

The IRM midterm report has been skeptical of the effectiveness of the public consultations. [67] This skepticism was reaffirmed by a representative of civil society who stated that consultations felt like a tick-the-box exercise, rather than a real effort to improve youth participation. Moreover, the civil society representative argued that the youth councils that existed prior to the action plan provided a theoretical exercise in civic participation for a very limited number of students and provided only limited practice in managing civic projects. [68] Finally, another civil society representative argued that the new consultative councils (Milestone 2) were not yet functional. [69]

Carried forward?

This commitment will be continued in the 2018–2020 national action plan as Commitment 4: Improve consultation and public participation for youth.

[66] “National Action Plan 2016-2018: Self-assessment report”, Open Government Partnership, 2018, pages 36-38, available [in Romanian] at https://bit.ly/2vv2yw7.

[67] The IRM progress report noted that the effectiveness of the public consultations was brought into questioning, as they often were informational events, and did not constitute genuine participation or youth engagement. (See “Romania progress report 2016–2017”, IRM, 2017, page 48, available at https://bit.ly/2vvxoou.)

[68] Diana Moldovan, Asociatia Impact Bistrita, interview with IRM researcher on 7 November 2018.

[69] Marian Damoc, Romanian Youth Movement for Democracy, interview by IRM researcher on 8 November 2018.


Commitments

  1. Streamline processes of consulting and involving citizens in innovative policy-making

    RO0066, 2020, Capacity Building

  2. Increase youth involvement in decision-making processes

    RO0067, 2020, E-Government

  3. Extend open government initiatives to the local level

    RO0068, 2020, Capacity Building

  4. Improving access to social services for vulnerable citizens

    RO0069, 2020, Capacity Building

  5. Create centralized public database for non-reimbursable financing

    RO0070, 2020, E-Government

  6. Analyze and increase availability of data on public allocations and procurements

    RO0071, 2020, Anti-Corruption

  7. Publish information about projects financed by Romania in the Republic of Moldova

    RO0072, 2020, Aid

  8. Promote rights of citizens belonging to national minorities

    RO0073, 2020, Access to Justice

  9. Assess and draft recommendations to improve health services

    RO0074, 2020, Access to Information

  10. Analyze data and train health professionals in reducing patient risk

    RO0075, 2020, Capacity Building

  11. Eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic procedures at central government level

    RO0076, 2020, E-Government

  12. Increase amount of open data

    RO0077, 2020, Access to Information

  13. Standardize Public Consultation Practices

    RO0048, 2018, E-Government

  14. Open Local Government

    RO0049, 2018, Capacity Building

  15. Citizen Budgets

    RO0050, 2018, Capacity Building

  16. Youth Participation

    RO0051, 2018, Capacity Building

  17. Register of Civil Society Proposals

    RO0052, 2018, E-Government

  18. Access to Information – Local

    RO0053, 2018, Capacity Building

  19. Online Business Sector Information

    RO0054, 2018, Capacity Building

  20. Digital Consular Services

    RO0055, 2018, Capacity Building

  21. Transparency in the Funding of Political Parties

    RO0056, 2018, Access to Information

  22. National Investment Fund Transparency

    RO0057, 2018, Access to Information

  23. Civil Servant Training

    RO0058, 2018, Capacity Building

  24. Raise Awareness About Corruption

    RO0059, 2018, Capacity Building

  25. Transparency of Seized Assets

    RO0060, 2018, Access to Information

  26. Access to Social Services

    RO0061, 2018, E-Government

  27. Open Access to Research

    RO0062, 2018, Access to Information

  28. Open Education

    RO0063, 2018, Access to Information

  29. Evaluate Open Data

    RO0064, 2018, Access to Information

  30. Open Data

    RO0065, 2018, Access to Information

  31. Improving the Legal Framework and Practices Regarding Access to Public Interest Information

    RO0030, 2016, Access to Information

  32. Centralized Publishing of Public Interest Information on the Single Gateway Transparenta.Gov.Ro

    RO0031, 2016, Capacity Building

  33. Promoting Open Parliament Principles

    RO0032, 2016, Capacity Building

  34. Starred commitment Improved Management of the Applications Submitted for Granting Citizenship

    RO0033, 2016, Capacity Building

  35. Standardization of Transparency Practices in the Decision-Making Procedures

    RO0034, 2016, Capacity Building

  36. Centralised Publication of Legislative Projects on the Single Gateway Consultare.Gov.Ro

    RO0035, 2016, Capacity Building

  37. Citizens Budgets

    RO0036, 2016, Capacity Building

  38. Improve Youth Consultation and Public Participation

    RO0037, 2016, Capacity Building

  39. Subnational Open Government

    RO0038, 2016, Capacity Building

  40. Promoting Transparency in the Decision-Making Process By Setting Up a Transparency Register (RUTI)

    RO0039, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  41. Access to Performance Indicators Monitored in the Implementation of the National Anticorruption Strategy (SNA)

    RO0040, 2016, Access to Information

  42. Improve Transparency in the Management of Seized Assets

    RO0041, 2016, Access to Information

  43. Annual Mandatory Training of Civil Servants on Integrity Matters

    RO0042, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  44. Improving Access to Cultural Heritage

    RO0043, 2016, Capacity Building

  45. Open Data and Transparency in Education

    RO0044, 2016, Access to Information

  46. Virtual School Library and Open Educational Resources

    RO0045, 2016, Capacity Building

  47. Open Contracting

    RO0046, 2016, Anti-Corruption

  48. Increasing the Quality and Quantity of Published Open Data

    RO0047, 2016, Access to Information

  49. Publishing the Public Interest Information on a Single Government Portal: Transparenta.Gov.Ro

    RO0019, 2014, Access to Information

  50. Making an Inventory of the Datasets Produced by the Ministries and Subordinate Agencies

    RO0020, 2014, Access to Information

  51. Starred commitment Ensuring the Free Online Access to National Legislation

    RO0021, 2014, E-Government

  52. Amending Law 109/2007 on the Re-Use of Public Sector Information

    RO0022, 2014, Access to Information

  53. Opening Data Collected from the National Health System

    RO0023, 2014, Access to Information

  54. Opening Data Collected from the Monitoring of Preventive Measures as Part of the National Anticorruption Strategy 2012-2015

    RO0024, 2014, Access to Information

  55. Open Contracting

    RO0025, 2014, Anti-Corruption

  56. Opening up Data Resulted from Publicly-Funded Research Projects

    RO0026, 2014, E-Government

  57. Increasing the Quality and Quantity of Published Open Data

    RO0027, 2014, Access to Information

  58. Human Resource Training in the Field of Open Data

    RO0028, 2014, Access to Information

  59. Disseminating Information on the OGP Principles and Promoting the Open Data Concept in an Accessible Manner

    RO0029, 2014, Public Participation

  60. Designating a Person Responsible for Publishing Open Data in Each Public Institution

    RO0001, 2012, Access to Information

  61. Identifying Regulatory Needs, Logistical and Technical Solutions

    RO0002, 2012, Access to Information

  62. Making an Inventory of Available (High-Value) Data-Sets

    RO0003, 2012, Access to Information

  63. Priority Publishing on the Web Pages of Public Institutions of Specific Data-Sets

    RO0004, 2012, Access to Information

  64. Initiating Pilot-Projects, in Partnerships

    RO0005, 2012, Access to Information

  65. Organizing Public Debates on the Utility of Open Data, in Partnerships

    RO0006, 2012, Access to Information

  66. Uniform, Machine-Readable Publishing Format for Open Data

    RO0007, 2012, Access to Information

  67. Procedures for Publication of Data-Sets Based on Civil Society Recommendations

    RO0008, 2012, Access to Information

  68. Procedures for Citizen Complaints Pertaining to Open Data

    RO0009, 2012, Access to Information

  69. Consultation Mechanism Between Suppliers and Beneficiaries of Open Data

    RO0010, 2012, Access to Information

  70. Creating a Rating System for the Assessment of High-Value Data-Sets

    RO0011, 2012, Access to Information

  71. Routinely Publishing Specific Data-Sets on Web Pages of Public Institutions

    RO0012, 2012, Access to Information

  72. Integrating Open Data from Public Institutions in a Single National Platform

    RO0013, 2012, Access to Information

  73. Inventories of Data, in Order to Facilitate Public Access

    RO0014, 2012, Access to Information

  74. Institute a Monitoring Mechanism of Compliance for Open Data

    RO0015, 2012, Access to Information

  75. Stimulating the Market for Innovative Use of Open Data

    RO0016, 2012, Access to Information

  76. Routinely Publishing Data-Sets on the National Platform, 25% High-Value

    RO0017, 2012, Access to Information

  77. The Public Procurement Electronic System (SEAP). the Electronic Allocation System for Transports (SAET)/B.1 C) Expanding the On-Line Submission of Fiscal Forms. Ensuring the Free On-Line Access to National Legislation. Developing Electronic Tools to Manage Subpoenas and Facilitate Access Toinformation Regarding Legal Proceedings. Developing Electronic Tools to Manage the Procedures Related to Obtaining the Romanian Citizenship. Developing Electronic Tools to Manage the Procedures Related to the Creation of Non-Profit Legal Persons. the Integrated System for Electronic Access to Justice (SIIAEJ)

    RO0018, 2012, Access to Justice

Open Government Partnership