Skip Navigation
Slovak Republic

Civil Society - Government Partnerships (SK0134)



Action Plan: Slovak Republic Action Plan 2019-2021

Action Plan Cycle: 2019

Status: Active


Lead Institution: NA

Support Institution(s): NA

Policy Areas


IRM Review

IRM Report: Slovakia Design Report 2019-2021

Starred: Pending IRM Review

Early Results: Pending IRM Review

Design i

Verifiable: Yes

Relevant to OGP Values: Civic Participation

Potential Impact:

Implementation i



In the current ESIF programming period 2014-2020, support for the development of civicnon-systematic, legal forms of non-governmental non-profit organizations are providedsupport from different operational programs defined in a non-uniform manner. In addition, cross-sectoralpartnerships are not adequately supported - for example, calls for NGOswithin the Operational Program Effective Public Administration (hereinafter referred to as “EVS OP”)beneficiaries have project partners from other sectors (local government, state administration).

At present no Operational Program in the investment strategy has the support of civic participationas a target or as a measure. In part, it is dedicated to supporting the development of civil societyOP EVS, which supports the creation of partnerships within the framework of calls for NGOsand networking subjects.

The commitment aims to create space for funding non-governmental non-profit projectsorganizations and projects forming partnerships between NGOs and othersentities (mainly municipalities, but also state institutions) and to unify the conditions of supportnon-governmental non-profit organizations from individual operational programs and their activities.Last but not least, the aim of the commitment is to create such conditions and requirements for beneficiariesin the implementation of projects appropriate to their capacities and, where appropriate, to build morecapacity of non-governmental non-profit organizations. Such a commitment develops all the principles of the Initiativefor open governance.

Effective partnership between individual subjects of public administration and civil societybased on cooperation and sharing of information, can lead not only to transparency, but also tothe citizen's view into the "domain" of public administration. This is also recognized and treated by the European Commissionthe principle of partnership and multi-level governance in the EU Regulation no. 1303/2013 as well as in Delegated Regulation no. 240/2014 (European Partnership Code). On the other hand, it canalso lead to a stronger citizen-centered approach (as a client of the public administration)A positive outcome is the improvement of the accountability of public administration towards its citizens.Creating space for the development of civil society and cross-sector partnerships is closely linkedwith the upcoming Partnership Agreement for the years 2021 - 2027 and the related relevant onesoperational programs. Promoting functional partnerships between public administration and civil societyThe Government of the Slovak Republic committed itself through the Concept through NGOs, NGOsdevelopment of civil society by 2020 and implementation of the Concept through ActionConcept plans for the development of civil society. Effective partnership and civic developmentCompanies are defined as one of the challenges under the national priorities for implementing the 2030 Agendain Slovakia, as well as in the forthcoming Vision and Strategy for the Development of the SR until 2030.

Specific milestones towards the goal:
19. Engage all partners under the European Partnership Code (DelegatedCommission Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 240/2014) into the process of programming EU cohesion policy fundsfor the period 2021 - 2027
Deadline: 31 December 2020
Responsible: Deputy Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic for investments and informatisation
Co-responsible: Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development

20. To coordinate and support the preparation of supporting documents for the Partnership Agreement 2021-2027 by the Partynon - governmental non - profit organizations and promote their inclusion in relevantdocuments
Deadline: until 31 January 2020
Responsible: Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development
Co-responsible: Deputy Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic for Investment and Information Technology

21. Promote awareness-raising on the added value of cross-sectoral partnerships on the sidepublic administration
Deadline: 30 June 2020
Responsible: Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development

22. Promote under Objective 5 ("Europe closer to citizens") in the new programming periodEuropean Structural and Investment Funds building cross - sector partnerships withinvolving representatives of NGOs and civil society
Deadline: 31 December 2020
Responsible: Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development

IRM Midterm Status Summary

9. Support civil society and intersectoral collaboration through 2021- 2027 ESIF programming period   

Main Objective

“Create conditions enabling development of civil society and operational inter-sectoral partnerships enhancing open governance at all levels of public administration during the 2021- 2027 programming period of the European structural and investment funds.” [136]


  1. Involve all partners in the process of programming the EU cohesion policy funds 2021 - 2027 in accordance with the European Code of Conduct on Partnership (Commission Delegated Regulation No 240/2014).
  2. Coordinate and promote drafting of the Partnership Agreement 2021 - 2027 by NGOs and enforce their proposals in relevant documents.
  3. Promote awareness-raising of the inter-sectional partnerships in public administration.
  4. Advocate for creation of inter-sectional partnerships engaging representatives of NGOs and civil society in accordance with commitment 5 (“Europe closer to citizens”) of the new programming period of the European Structural and Investment Funds.

Editorial Note: For the complete text of this commitment, please see Slovakia’s action plan at

IRM Design Report Assessment





Civic Participation

Potential impact:


Commitment Analysis

This commitment focusing on intersectoral partnerships in the context of the programming of EU funding, is being addressed for the first time by a Slovak action plan. It aims to create favorable conditions for civil society to participate in the 2021- 2027 programming period of the European structural and investment funds (ESIF) [137] and support civil society-government collaboration at all stages of the programming period, starting with participatory drafting of the Partnership Agreement. Since joining the EU in 2004, Slovakia has been able to make use of the EU funding available through ESIF. Currently, Slovakia already benefits from the third 2014 – 2020 ESIF programming period during which it has received EUR 15.3 billion. The EU transfers accounted for 10.6 percent (EUR 1.7 billion) of the 2020 state budget income (EUR 15.8 billion). [138]


Although this commitment would have been implemented nevertheless (outside of OGP), as the representative of the Office of the Plenipotentiary [139] confirmed, given that the Partnership Agreement shares OGP values, the Office of the Plenipotentiary took the opportunity and included preparation of the next ESIF programming period in this new action plan.  

It is relevant to the OGP value of civic participation because CSOs are invited to collaborate in the ESIF program development and implementation process.

The first three milestones for this commitment address issues relating to civil society participation and awareness raising of the process of programming funds and drafting the Partnership Agreement with public institutions. According to EU regulations, [140] governments need to establish close collaboration between public administration and civil society at the national and local levels throughout all stages of the ESIF programming period. Governments also need to ensure all stakeholders are selected in an open procedure. [141] Regulations also emphasize the importance of timely and accurate information sharing. Managing authorities in all member states are obliged to establish multi-stakeholder monitoring committees, which should primarily promote the ownership of programming and implementation and oversee how the funds are managed. The central managing authority of these funds in Slovakia is the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister for Investments and E-government.

Scholarly research investigating the operation of ESIF monitoring committees in Slovakia [142] concluded that during the previous 2007 – 2013 ESIF programming period, there was a lack of intersectoral collaboration. Batory and Cartwright found [143] that the extent of CSOs’ participation in monitoring committees was contentious and did not live up to expectations. Many committees operated in an overly formalistic manner, and room for genuine deliberations was limited. Committees’ meetings were infrequent, discussions were confidential, and access to information to any outsiders was strictly limited. [144] Some organizations that were presented as representing civil society were, in fact, public or quasi-public bodies. [145] In the absence of transparent formal selection procedures, government control over the nomination of CSO representatives was strong.

Although some problems persisted, the representative of the Office of the Plenipotentiary [146] stated that intersectoral collaboration has improved since the 2007-13 ESIF programming period and the monitoring committees have proved to be useful platforms for knowledge exchange. [147] However, CSOs’ human resources are limited to benefit fully from this opportunity, [148] which is one of the issues that the present commitment aims to address by “creating enabling environment for funding CSOs’ projects” [149] and their collaborations with other partners. In 2014, the Government Council for CSOs organized the first formal selection procedures of CSO representatives in the ESIF monitoring committees. [150] Despite only five days for self-nomination, 41 CSO representatives [151] became members of different monitoring committees in the current 2014 – 2020 ESIF programming period. In addition to the committees, the central managing authority [152] uses other means to engage with civil society stakeholders, such as less formal communication with wider civil society (also organizations that are not represented on the committees).

The milestones on collaborative drafting of the Partnership Agreement and awareness raising of intersectoral partnerships could be helpful in tackling the lack of institutionalized support for civil society-government collaboration that occurred in the 2014 – 2020 programming period. For instance, some of the calls did not allow beneficiaries (such as local government) to use their budget for project partners from other sectors (such as civil society). [153] At the same time, in some projects but not others, the applicant was required to have a partner from other sectors to be able to participate in the call.

The commitment as it stands will potentially have a minor impact. Given the scope of the ESIF programming periods, if the commitment is fully implemented and the partnership agreement is developed in a genuinely participatory manner, it might have a moderate potential impact and strengthen civil society participation in programming, implementation, and monitoring of funds. It might also lead to the creation of new partnerships between CSOs and public administration at national and local levels. However, a civil society interviewee [154] argued that the main issue that needs to be addressed to support civil society is the administrative burden posed on both CSOs and public administration, which is currently significant and might have severe economic repercussions for CSOs.    

[136] Office of the Plenipotentiary, Open Government Partnership National Action Plan of the Slovak Republic 2020 – 2021,
[137] European Commission, European structural and investment funds, These are five funds: European regional development fund, European social fund, European agricultural fund for rural development, European maritime and fisheries fund, and Cohesion fund, where Slovakia has been one of the beneficiary countries. Cohesion policy is the EU’s main investment policy, and funds are channeled to all EU member countries with GNI per capita lower than 90 percent of the EU average.
[138] Ministry of Finance,
[139] Interview with Miroslav Mojžiš, Office of the Plenipotentiary, 19 March 2020, Section VI - Methodology and Sources for more information.
[140] Official Journal of the European Union, Regulation (EU) no 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006,, and Official Journal of the European Union, Commission delegated regulation (EU) No 240/2014 of 7 January 2014 on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds,
[141] Ibid.
[142] Petsinis, Vassilis (2014), The Management and Distribution of the Structural Funds in Slovakia: A Critical Enquiry. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 4, 341−352 and Batory, Agnes and Andrew Cartwright (2011), Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: The role of civil society organizations in Structural Funds monitoring, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (4), 697–717.
[143] Batory, Agnes and Cartwright, Andrew, Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: The role of civil society organizations in Structural Funds monitoring, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (4), 697–717.
[144] Ibid. 
[145] The authors provided examples of the Slovak Rectors Conference and the National Institute of Education. 
[146] Interview with Miroslav Mojžiš, Office of the Plenipotentiary, 19 March 2020, Section VI - Methodology and Sources for more information.
[147] Batory, Agnes and Cartwright, Andrew, Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: The role of civil society organizations in Structural Funds monitoring, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (4), 697–717.
[148] Miroslav Mojžiš stated that membership of monitoring committees is not salaried. However, as the representative of the Plenipotentiary argued, an experiment introducing fees for participation was conducted but not associated with greater involvement of CSOs.           
[149] Office of the Plenipotentiary, Open Government Partnership National Action Plan of the Slovak Republic 2020 – 2021,
[150] Office of the Plenipotentiary, Zástupcovia MNO v monitorovacích výboroch EŠIF (CSOs representatives in the ESIF monitoring committees), (in Slovak).
[151] Office of the Plenipotentiary, Zástupcovia MNO v monitorovacích výboroch (CSOs representatives in the monitoring committees), (in Slovak).
[152] The central coordinating authority is the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister for Investments and E-government, 
[153] Interview with Miroslav Mojžiš, Office of the Plenipotentiary, 19 March 2020, Section VI - Methodology and Sources for more information.
[154] Interview with Veronika Prachárová, Slovak Governance Institute, 28 May 2020, Section VI - Methodology and Sources for more information.


  1. Publish Implementation Plans for Regulations

    SK0126, 2019, E-Government

  2. Regularly Publish Government Datasets

    SK0127, 2019, Access to Information

  3. Publish Data on Use of EU Grant Funding

    SK0128, 2019, Aid

  4. Publish Beneficial Ownership Data

    SK0129, 2019, Anti-Corruption

  5. Educational Resources Portal

    SK0130, 2019, Capacity Building

  6. National Open Science Strategy

    SK0131, 2019, Capacity Building

  7. Continuous Education for Participatory Policymaking

    SK0132, 2019, Capacity Building

  8. Report on Public Participation in Lawmaking

    SK0133, 2019, Open Regulations

  9. Civil Society - Government Partnerships

    SK0134, 2019, Subnational

  10. Legislation Materials Portal

    SK0135, 2019, Access to Information

  11. Monitor Fulfillment of the Next Action Plan

    SK0136, 2019,

  12. Open Data Portal

    SK0058, 2017, Access to Information

  13. Submit a Draft Law on Data to the Government.

    SK0059, 2017, Access to Information

  14. Public Administration Employee Training

    SK0060, 2017, Access to Information

  15. Data Publication Standards

    SK0061, 2017, Access to Information

  16. Update Open Data Portal

    SK0062, 2017, Access to Information

  17. Open Data Publication

    SK0063, 2017, Access to Information

  18. Open Data Awareness-Raising

    SK0064, 2017, Access to Information

  19. Survey About Open Data

    SK0065, 2017, Access to Information

  20. Publish Open Data

    SK0066, 2017, Access to Information

  21. Analysis of Open Data

    SK0067, 2017, Access to Information

  22. Open Data Strategy

    SK0068, 2017, Access to Information

  23. Develop Standards for Publicly Available Application Programming Interfaces and Submit Them to the Commission for the Standardization of Information Systems in Public Administration.

    SK0069, 2017, E-Government

  24. Ensure Open Data Publication

    SK0070, 2017, Access to Information

  25. Survey of Public Demand for Application Programming Interfaces

    SK0071, 2017, E-Government

  26. Publish Application Programming Interfaces

    SK0072, 2017, Access to Information

  27. Enable the Disclosure of Source Code and Development Using Open Methods for Newly Developed Plug-Ins and Extensions of Web Browsers and Client Applications.

    SK0073, 2017, Access to Information

  28. Custom-Made Information Systems

    SK0074, 2017, Access to Information

  29. Publish Open Source Software Data

    SK0075, 2017, Access to Information

  30. Study About Open Source Software

    SK0076, 2017, Access to Information

  31. Feasibility Study on NGO Satellite Account

    SK0077, 2017, Access to Information

  32. Define the Minimum Scope and Structure of the Disclosed Data on the Use of European Structural and Investment Funds, the EEA Financial Mechanism, Norwegian Financial Mechanism, the Swiss Financial Mechanism and Subsidy Schemes From the State Budget.

    SK0078, 2017, Aid

  33. Publish Financial Data

    SK0079, 2017, Access to Information

  34. Propose Changes to Central Register of Contracts Regulation

    SK0080, 2017, Anti-Corruption

  35. Create Space for the Publication of Local Self-Government (Municipality) Contracts in a Single Central Repository.

    SK0081, 2017, Anti-Corruption

  36. Establish and Operate a Repository of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic for Storage, Long-Term Archiving and Access to Educational Resources.

    SK0082, 2017, Access to Information

  37. Open Education Resources

    SK0083, 2017, Access to Information

  38. Reach Out to Partners Who Have Provided Educational Resources After 2008 to the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic Or to Its Directly Managed OrGanizations, with a Suggestion to Make Educational Resources Available Under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) Public License.

    SK0084, 2017, E-Government

  39. Enforce Public Licensing

    SK0085, 2017, Education

  40. Make Educational Resources Available in Local Langage

    SK0086, 2017, Education

  41. Ensure Availability of University Textbooks

    SK0087, 2017, Access to Information

  42. Introduce Specific Rules for Open Publication and the Obligation to Provide Free Access of Selected Publicly Funded Publica-Tions

    SK0088, 2017, Access to Information

  43. Analyze the Possibility of Applying Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) Public License As Standard for Selected Works Mandatorily Published in the Central Registry of Theses and Dissertations.

    SK0089, 2017, E-Government

  44. Awareness-Raising About Open Education Resources

    SK0090, 2017, E-Government

  45. Publish the Outcomes of the Approval Process of Educational Resources on the Web-Site of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.

    SK0091, 2017, Access to Information

  46. To Introduce the Basic Principles of Open Access to Scientific Publications Under a Public License Under the Operational Program Research and Innovation.

    SK0092, 2017, Access to Information

  47. Ensure the Implementation of Public License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)

    SK0093, 2017, Access to Information

  48. Establish Contact Office for Open Access.

    SK0094, 2017, Access to Information

  49. Establish Conditions for Passportization of Open Research Data Under a Public License and Monitor Its Implementation in Practice.

    SK0095, 2017, Access to Information

  50. Establish and Operate a Repository to Provide Storage, Long-Term Archiving and Ac-Cess to Slovak Scientific and Academic Publications, Research Data and Gray Literature.

    SK0096, 2017, Access to Information

  51. Design Systematic Benchmarking Monitoring Mechanisms for the Measurement and Comparison and Propose Further Analyses Related to Acquiring, Processing and Re-Use of Research Data and Open Access Scientific Publications.

    SK0097, 2017, Access to Information

  52. Raise Awareness About Open Access in Academic Community

    SK0098, 2017, Access to Information

  53. Participate in International Coordination on Open Education Reforms

    SK0099, 2017, Access to Information

  54. Participatory Public Policy

    SK0100, 2017, E-Government

  55. Citizen-Traingin on Public Policy Making

    SK0101, 2017, Capacity Building

  56. Create Engaging Public Policies

    SK0102, 2017, Capacity Building

  57. Government Employee Peer-Exchange

    SK0103, 2017, Capacity Building

  58. Evaluate Identified Participatory Processes of Creation and Implementation of Pub-Lic Policies and Disseminate Examples of Good Practice Based on This Evaluation.

    SK0104, 2017, Capacity Building

  59. Promote Partnership and Dialogue Between Public Authorities, Citizens and NGOs at National, Regional and Local Level in the Area of Participatory Public Policy-Making.

    SK0105, 2017, Capacity Building

  60. Propose a Recommendation of Internal Guidelines on the Use of Free On-Line Tools in Participatory Creation of Public Policies.

    SK0106, 2017, Capacity Building

  61. Create Learning Tools in the Field of Participation.

    SK0107, 2017, Capacity Building

  62. Use Educational Tools About Participation in Formal Education Using Informal Learn-Ing Methods.

    SK0108, 2017, E-Government

  63. Develop Recommendations for Embedding Participatory Processes Into Organiza-Tional Processes, Internal Guidelines and Other Documents for the Needs of Central Government Bodies.

    SK0109, 2017, Capacity Building

  64. Reassess the Implementation of the Publication of Assessments of Judges in Terms of the Clarity and Making Further Analysis Easier

    SK0110, 2017, E-Government

  65. Specify Which Court Decisions Do Not Need to Be Published.

    SK0111, 2017, E-Government

  66. Standardize Submission Requirements for Slov-Lex Portal

    SK0112, 2017, Access to Information

  67. Draft Legislation About the Responsibility of Judges

    SK0113, 2017, E-Government

  68. Draft Legislation to Ensure Public Scrutiny of Judges

    SK0114, 2017, Judiciary

  69. Prepare Legislation That Will Ensure the Publication of the Seat of Office of Individual Prosecutors

    SK0115, 2017, E-Government

  70. Create Draft Legislation to Extend the Right to Recommend Candidates for the Post of Attorney-General.

    SK0116, 2017, Legislation & Regulation

  71. Participatory Analysis of Prosecutor's Affairs

    SK0117, 2017, E-Government

  72. In a Participatory Manner, Analyze the Selection Procedures

    SK0118, 2017, Justice

  73. Awareness-Raising About Anti-Social Activities

    SK0119, 2017, Anti-Corruption

  74. Analyze and Evaluate Preliminary Information and Reports on Public Participation in the Process of Drafting and Commenting on Draft Legislation.

    SK0120, 2017, E-Government

  75. Analyze and Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Electronic Collective Petition.

    SK0121, 2017, E-Government

  76. Identify the Person Responsible for Implementing the Tasks of the OGP National Action Plan 2017-2019 in the Organization.

    SK0122, 2017, E-Government

  77. Coordinate the Working Group on the Implementation of the OGP National Action Plan 2017-2019.

    SK0123, 2017,

  78. Develop the Final Evaluation of the OGP National Action Plan 2017-2019.

    SK0124, 2017, E-Government

  79. Prepare and Submit for the Government of the Slovak Republic the OGP National Action Plan for the Following Period.

    SK0125, 2017, E-Government

  80. List of Open Data Datasets

    SK0023, 2015, Access to Information

  81. Publish Open Data

    SK0024, 2015, Access to Information

  82. Survey of Open Data

    SK0025, 2015, Access to Information

  83. Publish Relevant Open Datasets

    SK0026, 2015, Access to Information

  84. Starred commitment Open Data Publication Strategy

    SK0027, 2015, Access to Information

  85. Grant Scheme Open Data Portal

    SK0028, 2015, Access to Information

  86. Web Portal Promotion Campaign

    SK0029, 2015, Access to Information

  87. Evaluate Grant Funding Open Data Application

    SK0030, 2015, Access to Information

  88. Digital Education Resources

    SK0031, 2015, Access to Information

  89. Map Existing Repositories

    SK0032, 2015, Access to Information

  90. Analyze Procurement Process for Education Resources

    SK0033, 2015, Access to Information

  91. Textbook Procurement Process

    SK0034, 2015, Access to Information

  92. Pilot Procurement Process

    SK0035, 2015, Access to Information

  93. Raise Awareness of Education Resources

    SK0036, 2015, Access to Information

  94. Join Multilateral Activities in Europe and Beyond That Support the Creation, Improvement, Sharing and Re-Use of Open Educational Resources.

    SK0037, 2015, Access to Information

  95. Map Existing Scientific Repositories

    SK0038, 2015, Access to Information

  96. Identify Barriers to Open Data Access

    SK0039, 2015, Access to Information

  97. Submit Analysis of Open Data Publication

    SK0040, 2015, Access to Information

  98. Data Publication Mechanism

    SK0041, 2015, Access to Information

  99. Raise Awareness About Open Access in Academic Community

    SK0042, 2015, Access to Information

  100. Assist Other Countries with Open Access Strategy

    SK0043, 2015, Access to Information

  101. Participatory Policy-Making

    SK0044, 2015, Open Regulations

  102. Workshops on Public Involvement in Policymaking

    SK0045, 2015, Capacity Building

  103. Starred commitment Develop Public Policy with Civil Society

    SK0047, 2015, Civic Space

  104. Starred commitment Develop Criteria for Evaluating Participation in Policymaking

    SK0048, 2015, Open Regulations

  105. Evaluate Policy Creation

    SK0049, 2015, Open Regulations

  106. Map Legislative Environments

    SK0050, 2015, Legislative

  107. Carry Out a Public Campaign to Promote the Collective Electronic Petitions.

    SK0051, 2015, Capacity Building

  108. Publish Evaluation of Justices

    SK0052, 2015, Judiciary

  109. Analyze Publication of Judicial Decisions

    SK0053, 2015, Judiciary

  110. Uniform Reporting of Judicial Decisions

    SK0054, 2015, Judiciary

  111. Publish List of Names of Prosecutors

    SK0055, 2015, Judiciary

  112. Final Evaluation of OGP Action Plan

    SK0056, 2015,

  113. Develop Next Action Plan

    SK0057, 2015,

  114. Starred commitment Open Data Portal Launch

    SK0001, 2012, Access to Information

  115. Publishing Datasets

    SK0002, 2012, Access to Information

  116. Datasets Mapping

    SK0003, 2012, Access to Information

  117. Data Standards

    SK0004, 2012, Access to Information

  118. Improved Register of Contracts

    SK0005, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  119. Starred commitment Continuous Dataset Publising

    SK0006, 2012, Access to Information

  120. Starred commitment ITMS Dataset

    SK0007, 2012, Access to Information

  121. EU Funds and Subsidies Monitoring

    SK0008, 2012, Fiscal Openness

  122. EU Funds and Subsidies Monitoring – Prepare Tender for Web Application

    SK0009, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  123. EU Funds and Subsidies Monitoring – Portal Launch

    SK0010, 2012, E-Government

  124. Participatory Policy Making

    SK0011, 2012, Capacity Building

  125. Starred commitment Apply Participatory Policy Making

    SK0012, 2012, Open Regulations

  126. Lawmaking Public Participation Rules

    SK0013, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  127. Participatory Policy Making

    SK0014, 2012, Open Regulations

  128. Collective e-Petitions

    SK0015, 2012, E-petitions

  129. Collective e-Petitions – Draft Amendment

    SK0016, 2012, E-petitions

  130. OGP Steering Committee

    SK0017, 2012,

  131. Transparency Council and Openess Barometer

    SK0018, 2012, Access to Information

  132. Develop Criteria for Transparency Council and Openess Barometer

    SK0019, 2012, Access to Information

  133. Conduct First Evaluation Using Openess Barometer

    SK0020, 2012, Access to Information

  134. Whistleblowers Protection Act

    SK0021, 2012, Anti-Corruption

  135. 2014-2015 Action Plan Development

    SK0022, 2012,

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!