Skip Navigation
United Kingdom

Open Policy Making (UK0092)

Overview

At-a-Glance

Action Plan: United Kingdom Action Plan 2019-2021

Action Plan Cycle: 2019

Status:

Institutions

Lead Institution: Cabinet Office

Support Institution(s): Other actors involved - government Policy Lab, Cabinet Office What works team, Cabinet Office GDS Other actors involved - CSOs, private sector, working groups, multilaterals, etc Children’s Rights Alliance for England, Sense about Science

Policy Areas

Democratizing Decision-Making, Public Participation, Regulatory Governance

IRM Review

IRM Report: United Kingdom Transitional Results Report 2019-2021, United Kingdom Design Report 2019-2021

Early Results: No IRM Data

Design i

Verifiable: Yes

Relevant to OGP Values: Yes

Ambition (see definition): Low

Implementation i

Completion:

Description

Objective
To work with the UK government’s Policy Lab in continuing to develop
resources to support Open Policy Making (OPM) for more informed and better
designed policies with the human experience in mind.
Policy Lab will deliver at least four ‘demonstrator’ projects commissioned by
departments which put citizens at the centre of policymaking and reach groups
whose voices may otherwise not be heard. Learnings from the projects will be
shared through the OPM toolkit, blogs, and reflective sessions with Civil
Society groups.
Together, we will share ideas on integrating best practices into policymaking;
consider the processes governments go through to consult people on policy;
and codesign materials that are tailored to different types of open
policymaking engagements. Policy Lab will continue working with departments
to increase the transparency and accessibility of evidence and to make policy
resources publicly available. GOV.UK team will work with the Civil Society and
Policy Lab to improve using and sharing their data as openly as possible.

What is the public problem that the commitment will address?
Open Policy Making (OPM) is a way for the government to create and deliver
policy that meets the demands of a fast-paced and increasingly digital world. It
means that policy is more informed and better designed for both, the
government and the people who use, or are impacted by, services. Open
policymakers design around the human experience, enable co-design
supported by evidence, and test policies as they develop them.
A core element of OPM is ensuring that evidence is used in a transparent and
open manner. This enables policymakers to have a common understanding of
people’s needs; for Civil Society, it helps understand the evidence base that
has informed decision making. It also provides opportunity to see if there are
gaps in the knowledge base and where further research might be
commissioned.
However, understanding the OPM theory differs from delivering it in practice.
OPM is not fully embedded across the government yet, and we have not fully
realised its potential.
It is vital that Open Policy Making is not an ‘add on’ to policymakers day to day
work. It should be embedded across Government organisations - at all levels
and at all points in the policymaking process. Policymakers need to be
supported to develop, trial, and understand a range of different approaches.
Further, citizen and end-user engagement is a continuously developing field,
with different tools and techniques advancing on an ongoing basis. The
Government has great expertise to draw on. Meeting people’s needs has
always been at the heart of GOV.UK’s mission. HMG can learn a lot about
citizens’ needs and behaviours from their interactions with government online.
This can help us to be more responsive to people, develop better services, and
inform more effective policymaking.

How will the commitment contribute to solve the public problem?
Open policymaking is a means of civic participation. Citizen engagement, as
part of that process, is a continuously developing field, with new evidence of
benefits and limitations of different techniques in different settings emerging
on an ongoing basis. There is no single correct model that should be adopted in
any given scenario, but instead a range of possible approaches, the design of
which needs to be adapted to the specific context of implementation as well as
the user groups you are designing for.
It is, therefore, important that governments and civil society continue to
explore the efficacy of different approaches to inclusive citizen engagement in
different scenarios, but do so in an agile way that enables continued
development of approaches, and encourages the sharing of best practice
across both Whitehall and local government.

Lead implementing organisation
Cabinet Office

Timeline
March 2019 - Autumn 2021

OGP values
Civic participation, Access to information.

Other actors involved - government
Policy Lab, Cabinet Office What works team, Cabinet Office GDS
Other actors involved - CSOs, private sector, working groups, multilaterals, etc
Children’s Rights Alliance for England, Sense about Science

Verifiable and measurable milestones to fulfil the commitment

Update the Open Policy Making Toolkit in collaboration
with delivery partners and stakeholders

Deliver at least 4 Open Policy Making demonstrator
projects (share learnings from 2018/19 in April and May
of 2019/20, feeding into NAP governance)

Identify stakeholders and proactively engage to verify
and publish outcomes of Open Policy Making impacts

Convene stakeholders to co-create new, and update
existing, standards for Open Policy Making approaches
based on mutually agreed best practice

Showcase Open Policy Making approaches and projects
back to stakeholders through existing channels (blogs,
toolkit, in-person presentations etc)

IRM Midterm Status Summary

3. Open policy making

Main Objective

“To work with the UK government’s Policy Lab in continuing to develop resources to support Open Policy Making (OPM) for more informed and better designed policies with the human experience in mind.

Policy Lab will deliver at least four ‘demonstrator’ projects commissioned by departments which put citizens at the centre of policymaking and reach groups whose voices may otherwise not be heard. Learnings from the projects will be shared through the OPM toolkit, blogs, and reflective sessions with Civil Society groups.

Together, we will share ideas on integrating best practices into policymaking; consider the processes governments go through to consult people on policy; and codesign materials that are tailored to different types of open policymaking engagements. Policy Lab will continue working with departments to increase the transparency and accessibility of evidence and to make policy resources publicly available. GOV.UK team will work with the Civil Society and Policy Lab to improve using and sharing their data as openly as possible.”

Milestones

  1. Update the Open Policy Making Toolkit in collaboration with delivery partners and stakeholders.
  2. Deliver at least 4 Open Policy Making demonstrator projects (share learnings from 2018/19 in April and May of 2019/20, feeding into NAP governance).
  3. Identify stakeholders and proactively engage to verify and publish outcomes of Open Policy Making impacts.
  4. Convene stakeholders to co-create new, and update existing, standards for Open Policy Making approaches based on mutually agreed best practice.
  5. Showcase Open Policy Making approaches and projects back to stakeholders through existing channels (blogs, toolkit, in-person presentations etc).

Editorial Note: For the complete text of this commitment, please see the United Kingdom’s action plan at https://bit.ly/2YPqNoV.

IRM Design Report Assessment

Verifiable:

Yes

Relevant:

Civic Participation

Potential impact:

Minor

Commitment Analysis

This commitment seeks to broaden transparency and inclusivity of the policy-making processes, to ensure that policy is fit for purpose and appropriate for the target beneficiaries. The action plan does not identify a specific problem in the current method of policy making that would require a more robust, open approach. However, the government recognises that policy making could be conducted with the assistance of better guidelines for policy-making actors, and that involvement of stakeholders could be standardised. [8]

The proposed activities include updating the Open Policy Making Toolkit, involving more stakeholders in developing open policy-making practices, and popularising this process within government. The UK’s existing Open Policy Making Toolkit (initially published February 2016) builds on the work of the UK Policy Lab, a civil service team dedicated to improving policy making within central government. Updates to the toolkit are needed to bring it more in line with current participatory norms of including diverse stakeholders and voices of end-users of services. Policy Lab will deliver at least four ‘demonstrator’ projects and learnings from the projects will be shared through the Open Policy Making Toolkit, blogs and reflective sessions with civil society. This commitment is relevant to the OGP value of civic participation, as the toolkit seeks to make policy making more participatory and the updates will be carried out in collaboration with civil society. The planned activities are verifiable, but few specific outcomes are envisioned, and it is unclear whether these stakeholders are external to the government or currently excluded from the process.

The inclusion of this commitment in the action plan represents the first time that open policy making has been addressed by the UK government at the national level. The fact that open policy making was an ongoing programme within government demonstrates a commitment to the practice. If implemented fully, the updates to the Open Policy Making Toolkit could help standardise the policy-making process and draw into the process a wider range of stakeholders. In principle, providing updated guidance, toolkits and training/workshops, ensuring it is informed by its users and beneficiaries, and integrating a wider range of stakeholders, could improve open policy-making practices. However, it is not clear that the planned activities in this commitment represent a departure from, or significant additional investment in, open policy making, beyond what the government already had planned. Given the significant room for the interpretation of success, it is difficult to assess the potential impact as higher than minor.

The IRM recommends that the UK government implement a more formal and structured process, supported financially and executed within well-defined parameters. This process could help ensure that meaningful participation opportunities exist beyond relatively easy to access organisations and individuals. This is even more important in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and developing online forms of participation to facilitate this could make the process more meaningful, and the outcomes of higher quality.

[8] Vasant Chari, Open Policy Lab/Cabinet Office (UK Government), interview 23 July 2020.

IRM End of Term Status Summary

Commitment 3. Open policy making

Substantial

This commitment involved updating the Open Policy Making Toolkit, involving more stakeholders in developing open policy making practices, and popularizing this process within government. The toolkit builds on the work of the UK Policy Lab, a civil service team dedicated to improving policy-making within central government.

The first milestone called for updating the Open Policy Making Toolkit in collaboration with delivery partners and stakeholders. According to the draft self-assessment, this is an ongoing activity to share learnings and new tools from policy innovation projects across the public sector through the toolkit on GOV.UK. However, the page for the toolkit on GOV.UK has not been updated since January 2017, so the IRM considers this milestone incomplete. [23]

The second milestone called for the Policy Lab to deliver at least four open policy making projects and to share learnings from these projects. The draft self-assessment lists six open policy making projects carried out during the action plan period by the Policy Lab and government departments. Among these projects were partnering with the Cabinet Office’s Disability Unit and Race Disparity Unit on a video ethnography research project with disabled people in the UK before and during the pandemic, [24] holding citizen engagement sessions to inform the design of the National Food Strategy, [25] working with the DCMS to lead a youth policy co-design project for social innovation, [26] and co-designing policy in parallel with COP26. [27] However, the draft self-assessment notes that these projects are pending permission from the policy teams to share learnings.

The third milestone aimed to engage stakeholders and publish outcomes of open policy making projects. The draft self-assessment notes that, between January 2019 and December 2021, Policy Lab completed 64 open policy making projects with stakeholders within and outside of government, as well as citizens. Policy Lab published learnings from some of these projects on its blog, or platforms overseen by key project partners. [28] For example, the Office for National Statistics published insights from Policy Lab’s video ethnography research project with disabled people in the UK before and during the pandemic (carried out in partnership with the Disability Unit and Race Disparity Unit). [29] However, it is difficult for the IRM to verify how many projects had learnings published.

The fourth milestone planned to convene stakeholders to co-create new, and update existing, standards for open policy making based on best practices. According to the drat self-assessment, Policy Lab has been working with the Policy Profession Unit to introduce a “philosophy of open policy making” into its 2021 standards and in the way it operates. However, this milestone was vaguely formulated, and the draft self-assessment does not explain how Policy Lab carried out this work.

Lastly, the fifth milestone called for showcasing open policy making approaches and projects back to stakeholders through existing channels (blogs, toolkit, in-person presentations etc.). During the implementation period, Policy Lab continued to update existing channels with progress on open policy making work, such as its blog, [30] SlideShare, [31] Twitter, [32] and the Open Policy Making Toolkit. The draft self-assessment mentions that during the pandemic, Policy Lab developed interactive online training sessions using digital tools like Slido to contextualize open policy making for teams across the UK Government and internationally.

[26] This project was published as a global case study in the ‘Design for Social Innovation’, November 2021, https://www.routledge.com/Design-for-Social-Innovation-Case-Studies-from-Around-the-World/Amatullo-Boyer-May-Shea/p/book/9780367898427
[28] UK Government, Policy Lab, https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/
[29] Office for National Statistics, Coronavirus and the social impacts on disabled people in Great Britain: July 2020, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/disability/articles/coronavirusandthesocialimpactsondisabledpeopleingreatbritain/july2020
[30] UK Government, Policy Lab, https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/
[32] Policy Lab UK Twitter account, https://twitter.com/PolicyLabUK

Commitments

Open Government Partnership