Government Grant Transparency (AM0036)
Action Plan: Armenia Action Plan 2018-2020
Action Plan Cycle: 2018
Lead Institution: Ministry of Finance
Support Institution(s): Staff of the Prime Minister, Ministry of Justice Public administration bodies Armavir Development Center NGO (upon consent) Karen Sargsyan (expert)
Policy AreasAnti-Corruption, Fiscal Openness, Open Contracting and Public Procurement, Public Participation, Public Procurement, Publication of Budget/Fiscal Information
2. Accountability for grants of the government: Ensuring transparency and accountability of allocation of grants from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia
Commitment Start and End Date Commitment Start: November 2018
Commitment End: August 2020
Lead implementing agency Ministry of Finance
Person responsible from lead implementing agency Sergey Shahnazaryan
Title, Department Head of Department for State Internal Financial Oversight and Methodology for Public Procurement
Other actors involved Other state actors involved Staff of the Prime Minister, Ministry of Justice
Public administration bodies
Civil society, private sector Armavir Development Center NGO (upon consent)
Karen Sargsyan (expert)
Issues subject to regulation The processes of allocation of grants from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia are regulated by the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On the State Budget”, the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On procurement” and Decision of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 1937-N of 24 December 2003 “On approving the procedure for allocation of subsidies and grants from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia to legal persons”.
The grants and donations allocated from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia (hereinafter referred to as “financial resources”) to non-commercial organisations (hereinafter referred to as “organisations”) shall be provided through competitive procedures only.
The obligation of an authorised body to publish the financial statement and programme report of organisations having won competitions shall be clearly defined.
The Third OGP Action Plan already included the “Accountability for grants of the government: Ensuring transparency and accountability of allocation of grants from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia” commitment purposed by Armavir Development Center NGO. However, within the scope of the commitment, the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs only elaborated a competition procedure, but did not apply it. The commitment was partially performed. The Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs of the Republic of Armenia is applying an online system for the provision of state grants, which allows making state support to youth organisations more transparent and public and raising the level of effectiveness of the process.
Almost all the grants are granted in an uncoordinated manner and without a competition.
The main intention of commitment is to make compulsory the competition procedures for granting financial resources from the State Budget to Non-Governmental Organisations (CSOs) and to develop unified mechanism (reports) of accountability for all agencies.
Main objective Allocate financial resources from the State Budget of the Republic of Armenia through a competition procedure. Improve access to and addressability of information on programmes implemented within the scope of the granted financial resources and the accountability and transparency of the sector.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
Language of the commitment as it appears in the action plan: 
Brief description: More efficient management of public resources, enhancement of public confidence, enhancement of public integrity.
2.1 Studying the instruments and procedures that are already applied for the provision of financial resources to CSOs; defining the advantages and disadvantages; improving the existing procedures by establishing grants; giving donations (grants) only through a competition, except for cases conditioned by exclusivity. 
2.2 Elaborating and introducing a unified package of sample application forms, attached documents and other necessary information.
2.3 Posting the results of competitions and the reports of beneficiary organisations on the official websites of authorised bodies.
Start Date: November 2018
End Date: August 2020
Context and Objectives
A set of laws regulates allocation of grants from the state budget in Armenia.  However, there is a strong public perception of a lack of transparency in the distribution of funds. As highlighted in the 2016–2018 IRM progress report, research and stakeholders identified a lack of a competitive mechanism of grant distribution by most state agencies.  The annual budget allocation for grants and subsidies to nongovernmental organizations was about 6.5 billion AMD in 2018  (approximately 13.3 million USD). The government allocated these funds in the areas of sports, culture, social protection, education, and others. However, information on grant programs has not been publicly available, and the methods of selecting grantee organizations are unknown. This scarcity of information undermines the transparency of funding distribution and raises concerns over the effectiveness of grant allocation.
The third action plan included a commitment (Commitment 2) that aimed to provide transparency of grants that were allocated through competition. It also called for the publishing of reports on state-funded grant projects. Although this commitment provided more information on projects implemented under the grants, the transparency and competitiveness of grant distribution remained unaddressed. Most state agencies did not organize any grant competition. The government allocated grants on a discretionary basis, with names of recipient organizations included in the law on budget or bylaws.  The lack of transparency in the grant allocation process has been discussed for several years in various reports, including the CSO Sustainability Index of the United States Agency for International Development.  Stakeholders participating in consultations during action plan development also highlighted the issue.  One of the key recommendations of the IRM Armenia Progress Report 2016–2018 called for establishing competitive and transparent mechanisms for awarding state grants and service contracts by executive agencies. 
The current commitment seeks to improve the procedures for granting financial resources from the state budget to organizations. It would do this by establishing mandatory competitive mechanisms, including application procedures, and developing a unified project reporting format for all agencies. While the commitment is overall verifiable, the language lacks clarity on the types of organizations to be covered. The English version of the action plan often refers to civil society organizations (CSOs), interpreted as nongovernmental organizations, in the background section. However, the Armenian version of the same section defines CSOs as nonprofit organizations. That term covers a larger scope of organizations, from religious and membership organizations to foundations and state-owned nonprofits.
Assuming that the commitment covers civil society organizations, it could contribute to improving a CSO-enabling environment. It would provide access to state funding for a larger number of CSOs through open and transparent grant provision mechanisms. The commitment could also improve public access to information on state funding distribution. In this regard, stakeholders consider this commitment as a necessary precondition for public budget transparency and improvement of public trust in public spending. Had the action plan been clearer in terms of the types of organizations covered by the commitment, it could have had a higher potential impact.
The IRM researcher recommends improving the specificity of the commitment by clearly defining the legal types of organizations covered by the commitment and referred to as civil society organizations (CSOs).
Further recommendations include:
- Along with the application forms, the procedure and criteria of the selection process need to be clearly defined and publicly available. Interviewed stakeholders recommended involving CSO representatives in the grant selection commission (with due attention to conflict-of-interest issues). Doing so could ensure a participatory process and fair selection. Measures should be taken to provide a fair and transparent selection process and exclude biases in the allocation of grants.
- As mentioned by one civil society stakeholder, attention should be paid to ensuring a smooth transition process from noncompetitive to competitive distribution of funding.  For example, many CSOs had been receiving state subsidies for providing social services to vulnerable groups, but their funding was interrupted in 2019. The government justified the interruption by stating that competitive procedures are to be introduced. As a result, these organizations had to stop their activities funded by the state and terminate contracts with the relevant staff.  Thus, some transition period could be planned before the establishment of the new mechanisms and the announcement of competition. This would help organizations dependent on state funding continue their services without interruption before the revised approaches are introduced in practice. A transition period can also provide such organizations the opportunity to participate in the competition and continue their operations.
- The IRM researcher recommends addressing in future action plans the need for proper monitoring and reporting of the projects funded by the state budget. The mechanisms of project monitoring by state are not transparent, and the government agencies publish the reports in an inconsistent manner with sometimes poor quality.  Unified standards of monitoring and reporting can be elaborated with the input of CSOs and international organizations, to provide better transparency and ensure the effectiveness of the funds spent.
Open Data in Official Declarations
AM0035, 2018, Access to Information
Government Grant Transparency
AM0036, 2018, Anti-Corruption
Beneficial Ownership Register
AM0037, 2018, Access to Information
Modernization of Community Website
AM0038, 2018, E-Government
State Water Cadastre
AM0039, 2018, E-Government
AM0040, 2018, E-Government
Integrated Social Services
AM0041, 2018, Access to Information
Unified Information System for Management of Education
AM0042, 2018, Access to Information
Exploring Medical Assistance Program
AM0043, 2018, E-Government
Platform for Submitting Petitions
AM0044, 2018, E-Government
Public Service Dashboard
AM0045, 2018, E-Government
State Travel Transparency
AM0027, 2016, E-Government
Accountability for Grants of the Government
AM0028, 2016, Anti-Corruption
Transparency of the State Budget
AM0029, 2016, Access to Information
"Open Data" in Official Declaration:
AM0030, 2016, Access to Information
Portal for Community Decisions.
AM0031, 2016, Capacity Building
AM0032, 2016, Capacity Building
Accessibility of Integrated Social Services
AM0033, 2016, E-Government
"One-Stop-Shop" Pilot Project Within Military Registration Offices
AM0034, 2016, Capacity Building
Digitization and publication of data in the “Republican Geological Fund” SNCO
AM0016, 2014, Access to Information
Ensuring Transparency in Mining
AM0017, 2014, Anti-Corruption
Ensuring Public Awareness About Health Care Financing
AM0018, 2014, E-Government
Ensuring Transparency of Asset and Income Declarations of the RA High-Ranking Officials
AM0019, 2014, Anti-Corruption
Online Broadcasting of the State Procurement Appeals Board Sessions
AM0020, 2014, Anti-Corruption
Community Microsurvey Introduction in 10 Communities
AM0021, 2014, E-Government
Ensuring Open, Transparent, Participatory and Accountable Process of State Policies and Legislative Reforms
AM0022, 2014, E-Government
Public Awareness on the Lawmaking Activity of State Governance Bodies
AM0023, 2014, E-Government
Ensuring Transparency of the Election of Governing Boards of the RA General Secondary Education Institutions and of the Annual Budget Planning and Expenses of Ra General Secondary Education Institutions
AM0024, 2014, Education
Knowledge and Capacity Building of Public Servants in the Freedom of Information and Anticorruption Field
AM0025, 2014, Access to Information
Ensuring Transparency of Local Self Government Bodies of Large Communities
AM0026, 2014, E-Government
Reviewing the Regulatory Normative Legal Acts (Regulatory Guillotine Project)
AM0001, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
Improving Internal Audit System for the Public Sector
AM0002, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Improving Procurement Procedures
AM0003, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Improving Budget Planning and Reporting Systems Through Full Utilization of Program Budgeting
AM0004, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Promoting Transparency and Objectiveness in Tax Administration
AM0005, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Fight Against Corruption
AM0006, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Introduction of a Unified Payment System (Portal)
AM0007, 2012, E-Government
State Car Inspection Improvements
AM0008, 2012, Infrastructure & Transport
Implementation of an Electronic System for Consular Services
AM0009, 2012, Citizenship & Immigration
Implementation of Mail-Armenia System
AM0010, 2012, Citizenship & Immigration
Introduction of e-Statistics System
AM0011, 2012, E-Government
Introduction of e-Documentation Sharing System in Urban Communities
AM0012, 2012, E-Government
Ensuring Transparency of Asset Declarations
AM0013, 2012, Anti-Corruption
Standardization of Offical Websites Content
AM0014, 2012, Access to Information
Improvement of Knowledge and Skills of Public Servants on Access to Information
AM0015, 2012, Access to Information