Contacts
www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/El-Ayuntamiento/Gobierno-abierto/
Resources
- Inception Report – Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2024 – 2027
2025, Inception Report, Web page
- Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2024 – 2027
2024, Action Plan, Web page
- Ejercicio Final de Aprendizaje II- Plan de Acción 2022-2023 – Madrid
2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page
- Final Learning Exercise II- Action Plan 2022-2023 – Madrid
2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page
- Final Learning Exercise- Action Plan 2022-2023 – Madrid
2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Improvement of the transparency portal and increase of open data visualisations
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Broaden the spectrum of participation
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Improvement of the decide Madrid platform
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Community Actions for a Healthy City Strategy
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- Final Monitoring Report – Action plan – Madrid, Spain – May 2023
2023, Self Assessment, Web page
- Informe final de seguimiento – Plan de Acción – Madrid, Spain – May 2023 (Spanish)
2023, Self Assessment, Web page
- Informe de seguimiento – Plan de Acción – Madrid, Spain – Dec 2022 (Spanish)
2023, Self Assessment, Web page
- Inception Report – Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2022 – 2023
2023, Inception Report, Web page
- IRM Report on Local Action Plans
2022, IRM Report, Web page
- Action plan – Madrid, Spain, 2022 – 2023
2022, Action Plan, Web page
- Madrid, Spain Design Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
- Madrid Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
- Madrid IRM Report 2017
2019, IRM Report, Web Page
- Madrid IRM Report 2017
2019, IRM Report, Web page
- Madrid Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
- Madrid Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
- Madrid Preliminary IRM Review 2017 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
- Madrid, Spain Action Plan 2017
2016, Action Plan, Web page
- Access Info Europe Endorsement Letter
2016, Letter, Web page
- Transparency International España Endorsement Letter
2016, Letter, Web page
- Civio Endorsement Letter
2016, Letter, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult:Â Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
IRM-Based Findings
Civic Space
IRM-Based Findings
Open Policy Making
IRM-Based Findings
Access to Information
IRM-Based Findings
Fiscal Openness
IRM-Based Findings