Skip Navigation

Paris, France

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 2

Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 3
  • Policy Area Focus: Participatory Budgeting, Participation in Open Data, Data Crowdsourcing

Paris is currently implementing 3 commitments from their 2019-2021 action plan.

Point of Contact

Sabine Romon Head of Innovation, General Secretariat sabine.romon@paris.fr

Commitments

  1. Solidarity Factory

    PAR0006, 2019, Marginalized Communities

  2. Climate Mobilization

    PAR0007, 2019, E-Government

  3. Open Contracting

    PAR0008, 2019, E-Government

  4. A More Inclusive Participatory Budget

    PAR0001, 2017, Marginalized Communities

  5. To Give the Parisians Tools to Be Committed

    PAR0002, 2017, Capacity Building

  6. Increasing Community Mobilization in New Datasets Request

    PAR0003, 2017, E-Government

  7. Increase Mobile and Geolocalised Crowdsourcing with Dansmarue V2

    PAR0004, 2017, E-Government

  8. Kick-Off of Paris City Innovation Lab

    PAR0005, 2017, Capacity Building

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
0
0
Action Plan 2

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 2

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Contracting
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Freedom of Association
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Defending Journalists and Activists
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Regulations
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

Right to Information
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Health)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Education)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Participation
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Oversight
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Resources

  1. Cresspa Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  2. DemocracyOS France Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  3. Open Knowledge Foundation France Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  4. Paris Final IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Paris Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Paris, France – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  7. Paris, France Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Paris, France Action Plan 2019 – 2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

Recent Posts