Create Favourable Environment for Media and Journalism (MN0026)
Action Plan: Not Attached
Action Plan Cycle: 2016
Lead Institution: Central Government Authority
Support Institution(s): Cabinet Secretariat of Government of Mongolia, Secretariat of Parliament and other relevant organisations; Civil society organisations who actively engage and conduct research on government transparency, corruption and governance issues.
Policy AreasCivic Space, Defending Journalists and Activists, Legislation & Regulation, Media & Telecommunications, Private Sector, Public Participation
Status quo or problem addressed by the commitment: Recommendation four of the special recommendations provided by the Independent Consultant Report on the implementation of the NAP for OPG of Mongolia for 2014- 16 stated that Mongolia should have a special commitment to freedom of media in cooperation with the media and journalism sector in the NAP for 2016-18. Journalists are worried about government actions to directly control the media. Currently, media outlets can are meeting the domestic demand for its 3 million people. Many large companies and politicians now own the media or have a “cooperation agreement” with the media that restricts the media from publicly releasing any negative information about that person or company. Main Objective: Adopt new Law on Freedom of Media, which meet international standards. To promote fair competition in media and to promote sector development, it is necessary to develop a transparent mechanism in media. To ensure and protect the rights of the journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their informants. Make amendment into the Law on National Broadcasting to ensure media is free from any political influence and has independent finances from the government. Brief Description of commitment (140 character limit): Facilitate consultation with the wide participation of media, civil society organisations and review the limitations for media contents and establish a legal environment that ensures the financial and political independence of MNB by amending the Law on Mongolian National Broadcasting.
IRM Midterm Status Summary
Facilitate consultation with a wide range of participants from the media to civil society organizations with the purpose of reviewing the limitations for media content and establishing a legal environment that ensures the financial and political independence of MNB by amending the Law on Mongolian National Broadcasting.
Status quo or problem addressed:
Recommendation four of the special recommendations provided by the Independent Consultant Report on the implementation of the NAP for the OPG of Mongolia for 2014-16 stated that Mongolia should have a special commitment to freedom of media in cooperation with the media and journalism sector in the NAP for 2016-18. Journalists are worried about government actions to directly control the media. Currently, media outlets are meeting the domestic demand for Mongolia's 3 million people. Many large companies and politicians now own a media outlet or have a 'cooperation agreement' with the media that restricts the media from publicly releasing any negative information about that person or company.
Adopt a new Law on Freedom of Media, which is in line with international standards.
To promote fair competition in the media industry and to promote the sectors development. It is necessary to develop a mechanism for transparency in media.
To ensure and protect the rights of journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their informants.
Make amendment into the Law on National Broadcasting to ensure media is free from political influence and has independent finances from the government.
5.1. Run a consultation session for the draft amendment of the Freedom of Media and present it to the Parliament upon assessing whether the legislation meets international standards.
5.2. After consulting with the public and ensuring that the Draft legislation meets international standards, the Draft legislation should be submitted. The draft should recognize the rights of journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their informants, and that media outlet owners must be transparent.
5.3. Plan and organize advocacy actions until the adoption of the law in cooperation with OGP engagement
5.4. Receive feedback and facilitate consultations with professional associations on what amendments can be made into the Law on Mongolian National Broadcasting to ensure the financial and political independence of broadcasting.
5.5. Submit the draft amendment of the law, which reflects the outcome of the consultation and organize advocacy actions until the Parliament passes the amendment.
5.6. Develop a legal environment to ensure Information transparency of the ownership of media.
Responsible institution: Central Government Authority responsible for Justice
Supporting institutions: Cabinet Secretariat of Government of Mongolia, Secretariat of Parliament and other relevant organizations, civil society organizations who actively engage and conduct research on government transparency, corruption and governance issues
Start date: 30 June 2016
End date: 30 June 2018
Mongolia has taken several steps towards protecting freedom of the press and media since the transition to democracy in the early 1990’s. The 1992 Constitution of Mongolia guarantees freedom of the press through Article 16.16,[Note65: Globe International Center, Media Freedom Report, 2012-2014, http://www.globeinter.org.mn/images/upld/Hevleliinerhcholoo2015english.pdf.] and the 1998 Law on Freedom of the Media prohibits state censorship of the media.[Note66: Law of Mongolia on Freedom of Media, available at: http://crc.gov.mn/contents//en/raw/12/30/27/10._Mongolian_Law_on_Freedom_of_Media.pdf.] The 2005 Law on Public Radio and Television established the Mongolia National Broadcaster (MNB) as a non-profit entity governed by a 15-member National Council that provides nationwide broadcasting services.[Note67: The Law of Mongolia on Public Radio and Television, available at: http://www.crc.gov.mn/en/k/x7/1q.] Additionally, Mongolia passed the Law on Information Transparency and Right to Information in 2011 which regulates transparency of the state and the rights of citizens and legal entities to seek and receive information.[Note68: Law on the Information Transparency and Right to Information, available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan047231.pdf.]
Despites these legislative efforts, observers have noted several persistent issues that hinder Mongolia’s media landscape. One such issue is the use of anti-defamation laws to dissuade criticism from journalists, often through the threat of excessive and disproportionate fines. The Globe International Center’s 2015 Media Freedom Report noted that between 1999 and 2015, 54.3 percent out of total 738 civil and criminal defamation cases were filed against media and journalists.[Note69: Globe International Center, Media Freedom Report, 2015, http://www.globeinter.org.mn/images/upld/Hevleliinerhcholoo2016eng.pdf. pg. 21.] In 2016, Global International Center registered 63 violations affecting the professional work of 61 journalists and media outlets, of which 12 were related to criminal defamation, detention, or arrest.[Note70: Globe International Center, Media Freedom Report 2016, https://www.forum-asia.org/uploads/wp/2017/05/Media_freedom_report_2016eng.pdf, pg. 16.] According to Freedom House’s 2016 Freedom of the Press Report, '(in Mongolia) self-censorship is encouraged by the risk of legal liability, and journalists often retract critical stories before defamation cases go to trial.'[Note71: See: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2016/mongolia.] In July 2015, one journalist was fined 19.2 million MNT (USD $10,000) following a defamation conviction, a sum of over 100 times the minimum monthly wage.[Note72: Zoljargal, M, 'Court releases jailed journalist after imposing fine,' The UB Post, 28 July 2015, http://ubpost.mongolnews.mn/?p=15526.]
Another issue is the lack of transparency regarding media ownership in Mongolia. Reporters Without Borders and the Press Institute of Mongolia reported in the 2016 Media Ownership Monitor that 29 out of a total of 39 investigated media outlets in Mongolia have political affiliations through their founders and/or owners.[Note73: Media Ownership Monitor Mongolia, available here: http://mongolia.mom-rsf.org/en/owner/.] The MNB has been criticized for its perceived lack of independence. According to the Centre on Law and Democracy, the MNB depends heavily on a direct government subsidies, which negatively impacts its independence and stability, and that the Law on Public Radio and Television does not clearly delineate the process of appointing the National Council, leading to political interference in the appointment process.[Note74: Centre for Law and Democracy, Report on Current Regulatory Issues and Needs in Mongolia, January 2010, http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10.01.Mongolia.Media-Situation.pdf.]
This commitment aims to improve the legal environment for journalists in Mongolia as well as transparency in media ownership by amending the Law on Media Freedom and the Law on Broadcasting. Specifically, the commitment calls for holding consultations with the public and media stakeholders before submitting the draft laws to parliament, assessing if the draft legislation meets international standards, and developing a legal framework to ensure information transparency of media ownership.
The considerable emphasis placed on public and stakeholder consultations to develop the amended media laws makes the commitment relevant to the OGP value of civic participation. The commitment also stipulates that the draft laws should develop a legal environment to ensure transparency of media ownership, making it relevant to the OGP value of access to information. Overall, the milestones clearly state that consultations will take place throughout the development of the draft amendments. However, the milestones do not explain how the draft amendments will reflect the outcomes of the public consultations. Therefore, the specificity is marked as medium. It should be noted that the development of the legal environment to ensure transparency of media ownership (Milestone 5.6), an important component of the commitment, is vague. Press and media freedom is an important issue in Mongolia and a major stakeholder priority that the previous action plan failed to address.
If fully implemented, this commitment could have a potentially transformative impact on the freedom of the press and journalism in Mongolia because the public and media stakeholders have an opportunity to directly influence the amendments to the country’s laws governing the media. Additionally, journalists and the public will have increased access to information regarding the ownership of media outlets, thus significantly improving both media and political transparency in the country. It is also positive that the government expects to draft the amendment through consultations with citizens. The previous IRM report highlighted the importance of this issue in its key recommendations, one of which called for the inclusion of a commitment on media freedom in collaboration with media civil society groups, journalists, and the press protection sector.[Note76: Independent Reporting Mechanism, Mongolia Progress Report 2014-2015, https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2001/01/Mongolia_14-15_Final_ENGLISH_0.pdf, pg. 61.]
In December 2016, the government submitted a draft Law on Broadcasting before Parliament.[Note77: Law of Mongolia on Broadcasting, available at: https://www.law-democracy.org/live/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mongolia.Bro_.Dec16.pdf.] Article 19[Note78: Available at: http://forum.parliament.mn/projects/356] of the draft law addresses the issue of media ownership transparency, and includes the disclosure of license-holder information. Article 19.3 stipulates that the Regulatory Commission (the government agency that issues media licenses)
In an analysis of the draft Law on Broadcasting, the Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD) found several elements that run contrary to international standards, such as failing to transform the Communications Regulatory Commission into an independent body, failing to provide for community broadcasters, and imposing an unduly harsh regime for regulating content.[Note79: Centre for Law and Democracy, Mongolia: Analysis of the Draft Broadcasting Law, March 2017, https://www.law-democracy.org/live/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Mongolia.Broadcasting.Mar17analysis.pdf, pg. 1.] CLD’s analysis also found that the draft law fails to clarify the criteria against which license applications shall be assessed, and does not require the licensing process to be transparent or to allow for public participation.[Note80: Ibid. pg. 6.]
The IRM inquired with the government regarding the public consultations carried out when drafting the amendment to the Law on Broadcasting and the Law on Media Freedom, as stipulated in the commitment milestones, as well as the steps taken to ensure these draft amendments meet international standards. However, there is no evidence that the government organized public consultations on these two draft laws during the reporting period. In March 2017, TV representatives discussed the draft Law on Broadcasting during the national TV forum, but this forum was not organized by the government. Given the lack of information on whether these consultations occurred, the overall implementation commitment is considered limited at the end of the first year of the action plan cycle.
Improving the operating environment for media outlets in Mongolia is a laudable goal, as it addresses a major stakeholder priority from the previous action plan. If this commitment is carried forward, the IRM recommends specifying what is meant by transparency of media ownership and financial and political independence of public broadcasting.
Transparent procurement process for healthcare
MN0035, 2019, E-Government
Digital participation in education service provision
MN0036, 2019, E-Government
Online system for public services
MN0037, 2019, E-Government
Participation in public procurement processes
MN0038, 2019, Aid
Transparent local development fund (LDF)
MN0039, 2019, Capacity Building
Increase public legal knowledge
MN0040, 2019, Capacity Building
Citizens' satisfaction survey
MN0041, 2019, Capacity Building
Transparent political party finance
MN0042, 2019, Legislation & Regulation
Improve governance of state owned enterprises
MN0043, 2019, Audits and Controls
Beneficial ownership transparency
MN0044, 2019, Beneficial Ownership
Contract transparency in extractives
MN0045, 2019, E-Government
Transparent M&E information system
MN0046, 2019, Capacity Building
Governance of waste management
MN0047, 2019, E-Government
Mobile Application for Citizens Feedback and Requests
MN0022, 2016, E-Government
Improve Provision and Quality of Education and Health Services
MN0023, 2016, E-Government
Civic Engagement in Decision Making
MN0024, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
Transparent Funding of Political Parties
MN0025, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Create Favourable Environment for Media and Journalism
MN0026, 2016, Civic Space
National Action Plan for Combating Corruption
MN0027, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Transparency of Loans and Aid from Foreign Countries
MN0028, 2016, Aid
Online Registration of VAT
MN0029, 2016, Capacity Building
Improve Glass Account System
MN0030, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Make Government Procurement Process Transparent
MN0031, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Transparency of Contracts of Public Resource Exploiting
MN0032, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Information Transparency of the Owners of the Entities with Rights to Use Mineral Resources
MN0033, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Make Licenses, Information and Activities of the Companies Transparent and Effective by Government
MN0034, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Monitor and Ensure Implementation of Information Transparency and Information Access Right Act by Establishing National Information Transparency Committee and Creating Structure of Information Commissary.
MN0001, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
Modernize Performance Indicators of Information Transparency of Public Organizations Into ―”Citizen Targeted” Ones.
MN0002, 2014, Capacity Building
Launch ―Transparent Account Systemǁ in Order to Enable Consistent, Transparent Reporting to the Public and to Provide Comprehensive Information on Budget Revenue Collection, Income and Expenditure Details, as Well as Public Procurement and Investments.
MN0003, 2014, Fiscal Transparency
Develop Central Information Database of Minerals, Oil, and Land Tenure License Owners, Open to the Public.
MN0004, 2014, E-Government
Ensure Transparency All Agreements on Investment, Stability and Production- Sharing of Public-Owned Resources Such as Water, Minerals, Oil and Land.
MN0005, 2014, Extractive Industries
Publish List of Mandatory Public Information on Environment Such as Information Regarding Any Action Harmful to Natural Environment and People’S Health.
MN0006, 2014, Environment and Climate
Disclose Information to the Public Relating to Foreign Loan Assistance Projects and Programs, Including the Total Amounts, Terms, Payback Duration and General Provisions Related to the Loan Rate, Board Members, and Implementation Bodies. Information About the Terms of Implementation of the Projects as Well as General Conditions of Contracts Between Suppliers and Buyers Shall Be Disclosed as Well.
MN0007, 2014, Aid
Disclose Budget Funded Procurement Contracts Above 80.0 Million MNT
MN0008, 2014, Open Contracting and Procurement
Ensure Civic Engagement in Planning and Developing Public Services at Central and Local Levels by Introducing Communication Channels Such as Organizing e-Conferences, Public Hearings, and Open Meetings.
MN0009, 2014, Public Participation
Launch “Smart Government” Program, for Delivering e-Public Services to the People Regardless of Distance and Location Through the Public Service Portal.
MN0010, 2014, E-Government
Create a Single Access Public Service for Citizens Without Requiring Supplementary State Registered Data, Based on Principles of “One Citizen-One Public Servant”.
MN0011, 2014, Public Service Delivery
Improve and Develop Smart e-Service Capability for “One Window-Public Service” and Introduce It as a Standard Unit of Public Service.
MN0012, 2014, E-Government
Increase Number of “Public Service Online Machines” at Local Levels for Delivering Public Services to Individuals in Remote Areas, as Well as Increase the Content of Its Data.
MN0013, 2014, E-Government
Report Public Feedback on Government Performance Received from the Government’S “11-11” Center. Government Shall Also Establish a Data System That Responds to and Tracks Petitions and Enquiries.
MN0014, 2014, Public Participation
Develop and Publish E-Mapping of Crime Occurrence.
MN0015, 2014, E-Government
Create a United Information Database on Law Enforcement Activities, Crimes and Violation Records, and Ensure That the Database Is Accessible to Relevant Bodies.
MN0016, 2014, E-Government
Introduce a System of Random Disclosure to the Public of Asset and Financial Statements of Any Public Servants.
MN0017, 2014, Asset Disclosure
Publish the Asset and Financial Statements of Officials Who Work in Organizations with a High Likelihood of Corruption Index on Websites and Ensure Citizen Monitoring.
MN0018, 2014, Asset Disclosure
Create Regulation That Repeals Decisions Made Without Due Participation of Citizens and Contradict Public Interests, as Well as Hold the Officials at Fault Accountable.
MN0019, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
Deliver the Draft Laws, Acts, Amendments and Administrative Rules to Public Attention in Due Time. in Particular, Create an Opportunity for People to Access Such Information from “Public Service Online Machines”, Citizens Chambers, and the Public Libraries at Each Provincial Level.
MN0020, 2014, Capacity Building
Strengthen the Capacity of Citizens by Implementing Certain Projects to Enhance Legal Knowledge of Target Groups Using Simple Language.
MN0021, 2014, Capacity Building