‘Open by Design’ pilots (NL0033)
Action Plan: Not Attached
Action Plan Cycle: 2018
Lead Institution: Rijk aan Informatie programme
Support Institution(s): • Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, confirmed • Municipality of Bodegraven-Reeuwijk, confirmed • Dutch National Archives (advice regarding sustainable accessibility), confirmed • Province of Zuid-Holland (tbc) • Municipality of Utrecht (tbc) • ILT (tbc) • Other ministries, provinces, municipalities • Instituut Maatschappelijke Innovatie (Institute for Social Innovation) (advice and coordination) • Open State Foundation
Policy AreasE-Government, Open Data, Records Management
‘Open by Design’ pilots
Start and end dates of the action point: 1 July 2018 - 30 June 2020
Main action owner (organisation) Rijk aan Informatie programme
Description of the action point
Which social issue does the action point seek to address? A lot of government information was already openly available in the Netherlands in 2018. But at the same time, there is much more government information that could be made publicly available without any problem. However, practical considerations prevent this information from being made public now.
This is a problem since the public availability of government information is considered to be a democratic obligation. Information that is financed by public funds should in principle also be available to the public. Citizens are entitled to see what is done with their tax money, which rules apply, what policy is initiated, which permits are granted, and what the government does.
Furthermore, government information is an important resource that new products or services can be based on and it thus makes a contribution to the economy and to innovation.
Active openness can also contribute to pushing back costly and time-intensive requests under the Dutch Open Government Act (Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuur - WOB).
And finally, if government information is openly available, this will contribute to the possibilities to monitor government actions, thus preventing waste. Making information publicly available enables benchmarking and comparing the performance of different authorities.
Active openness should therefore be arranged at the start of the primary process: ‘Open by Design’. If active openness remains confined to the ‘ex post’ earmarking of a number of documents or datasets that are suited to actively being made openly available, the extent and topicality of these documents and this data will always be limited. This will lead to extra work, arbitrariness, and greatly outdated files.
What is the action point? To achieve proper access to government information, it is important that openness and open standards are taken into consideration as much as possible when designing information systems. In order to establish what this means for information systems, experience will have to be gathered through a number of pilots. Open standards, open formats for reusability, meta data and linked data for findability and cohesion, privacy, security and accessibility are aspects that come into play here.
Some five to ten government organisations are therefore going to start pilots with ‘Open by Design’, where the openness of some categories of information is controlled and fine-tuned in the ‘engine room of public administration’.
How will the action point contribute to remedying the social issue? Citizens, companies and community organisations will get up-to-date information about various subjects, e.g. permits, government performance, financial information, research reports. Sharing knowledge and information will put other parties in a better position to develop policy alternatives or build new apps (similar to the Buienradar weather forecast app, but then for applications concerning safety and security, education, healthcare, sustainability, parking, etc.).
Steps for the individual pilots:
1. Intake, go or no go
2. Exploration of information categories. Which categories of government information are suitable for 'open by design'? Identify 1-3 categories for a pilot.
3. Quick scan of technical options. Which technical routes are possible in terms of system requirements? How to deal with privacy and security? What seems to be the most logical method of granting access: through a website, portal, open municipal council information system or otherwise?
4. Process and organisation. What is needed in terms of process, organisation, finances? What will it mean for the behaviour of the employees involved?
5. Implementation of pilot, rapid prototyping.
6. Conclusions and recommendations. Functional requirements for information systems. Possible follow-up steps.
Why is this action point relevant to OGP values? Open by Design will contribute to more information being released and to its quality and accessibility being improved.
Open by Design will also improve the opportunities for the public to influence decisions. Publishing proposed legislation (legislative consultation), policy evaluations and research reports, or the agendas of administrative bodies will offer the public the opportunity to participate and to provide their input.
And it is also relevant to public accountability.
The ‘Open by Design’ pilots intersect with other government programmes such as Rijk aan Informatie, the MOOI (Modernisation of the publication of government information) programme and the efforts of VNG Realisatie concerning Open Municipal Council Information.
Milestone with a verifiable result (please note: SMART) Start date: End date:
Recruiting participating partners, the goal is 5-10 authorities (ministries, provinces, municipalities, implementing bodies) 01 March 2018 30 November 2018
Start of pilots in individual organisations 01 July 2018 30 June 2019
Sharing of knowledge among participating organisations (semi-annual meeting). 01 July 2018 30 June 2020
Conclusions and recommendations for follow-up, per organisation 01 January 2019 30 April 2020
General conclusions and recommendations, advice on broad approach and roll-out. 01 January 2020 30 June 2020
Name of the responsible person representing the main action owner Jacqueline Rutjens
Position, organisational unit Programme director of the Rijk aan Informatie programme
Email and phone number Jacqueline.Rutjens@minbzk.nl, 06 4813 7690Other actors involved Authorities involved • Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, confirmed
• Municipality of Bodegraven-Reeuwijk, confirmed
• Dutch National Archives (advice regarding sustainable accessibility), confirmed
• Province of Zuid-Holland (tbc)
• Municipality of Utrecht (tbc)
• ILT (tbc)
• Other ministries, provinces, municipalities
Other organisations or bodies (such as community organisations or the private sector) • Instituut Maatschappelijke Innovatie (Institute for Social Innovation) (advice and coordination)
• Open State Foundation
local digital democracy
NL0028, 2018, E-Government
NL0029, 2018, Capacity Building
NL0030, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions
NL0031, 2018, Capacity Building
open local decision-making
NL0032, 2018, Capacity Building
‘Open by Design’ pilots
NL0033, 2018, E-Government
NL0034, 2018, Open Contracting and Procurement
NL0035, 2018, Audits and Controls
Open government standard and dashboard
NL0036, 2018, E-Government
Pioneering Network for an Open Government for Municipalities
NL0037, 2018, Capacity Building
Transparent political party finance
NL0038, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
National Open Data Agenda
NL0019, 2016, Capacity Building
Stuiveling Open Data Award
NL0020, 2016, Open Data
Groningen Open Data Re-use
NL0021, 2016, Infrastructure & Transport
Releasing ministerial research reports
NL0022, 2016, Health
Detailed open spending data
NL0023, 2016, Fiscal Transparency
Open local authority decision-making
NL0024, 2016, Open Data
Training civil servants on public participation
NL0025, 2016, Capacity Building
Easier freedom of information requests
NL0026, 2016, Capacity Building
Open Government Expertise Centre (LEOO)
NL0027, 2016, Capacity Building
Further develop and promote disclosure and use of Open Data
NL0001, 2013, E-Government
Increase financial transparency through Open Budget and experiments with Open Spending and Budget Monitoring
NL0002, 2013, E-Government
Open House of Representatives
NL0003, 2013, E-Government
Instruments for integrity
NL0004, 2013, Anti-Corruption Institutions
Revamp the legislative calendar
NL0005, 2013, E-Government
More online consultation
NL0006, 2013, E-Government
More transparency in decision-making through Volgdewet.nl legislation-tracking website
NL0007, 2013, E-Government
Informal approach to freedom of information requests
NL0008, 2013, Right to Information
From Rules to Freedom
NL0009, 2013, Public Participation
Change attitudes and procedures through Smarter
Working and ‘Public Servant 2.0’
NL0010, 2013, Capacity Building
NL0011, 2013, Public Participation
Develop and implement participation policy at the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
NL0012, 2013, Public Participation
Make government information accessible and easy to
NL0013, 2013, Capacity Building
Make citizens better informed and more empowered: public inspection and correction of information
NL0014, 2013, E-Government
Open announcements and notifications
NL0015, 2013, E-Government
Public services and the user perspective
NL0016, 2013, E-Government
Designate categories of government information for
NL0017, 2013, Capacity Building
Rethink information management and active access: four ‘open by design’ pilot projects
NL0018, 2013, E-Government