Inception Report – Action plan – Orzhytsia, Ukraine, 2025 – 2026
- Action Plan: Action plan – Orzhytsia, Ukraine, 2025 – 2026
Overview
Name of Evaluator
Skliar Inna
Member Name
Orzhytsia, Ukraine
Action PlanAction plans are at the core of a government’s participation in OGP. They are the product of a co-creation process in which government and civil society jointly develop commitments to open governmen... Title
Action plan – Orzhytsia, Ukraine, 2025 – 2026
Section 1.
Compliance with
co-creation requirements
1.1 Does a forum exist?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
A forum was established as part of the Orzhytsia–Zviahel consortium’s participation in the OGP Local initiative. The forum was actively involved in the co-creation of the 2025–2026 Action Plan through key events such as the strategic session on 10 October 2024 and the coordination meeting on 14 November 2024. These meetings brought together representatives from local governments, civil society organizations, youthRecognizing that investing in youth means investing in a better future, OGP participating governments are creating meaningful opportunities for youth to participate in government processes. Technical ... More, veterans, and experts in open governance, including those from the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Council of Europe, and the Association of Ukrainian Cities. During these sessions, the forum jointly identified community priorities and key commitments, including youth policy, veteran support, and the implementation of a school participatory budget, laying the foundation for transparent and accountable local governance.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Council Decision OGP -_English
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Strategic session with broad participation (10 October 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1728578253/
Coordination meeting with national and international experts (14 November 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1731571734/
Formal adoption of the Action Plan (24 December 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1735045871/
1.2 Is the forum multi-stakeholder?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The forum created in Orzhytsia for the OGP Local process includes both governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. It brings together local officials, youth, activists, veterans, educators, and civil society organizations such as “Nasha Orzhytsia” and “Diieva Natsiia.” These groups actively participated in priority-setting and drafting the Action Plan. Their involvement ensured diverse perspectives and shared ownership of the commitments.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Civic participation – NGO “Nasha Orzhytsia” as implementation partner (November 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1732799268/
Inclusive outreach to veterans and affected families (March 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1742980262/
Youth engagement roundtable (17 January 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1737123560/
1.3 Does the forum hold at least one meeting with civil society and non-governmental stakeholders during the co-creation of the action plan?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
During the co-creation processCollaboration between government, civil society and other stakeholders (e.g., citizens, academics, private sector) is at the heart of the OGP process. Participating governments must ensure that a dive..., the forum organized at least 8 meetings with civil society and non-governmental stakeholders. These included local strategic sessions, consultations with youth and veteran organizations, working meetings with experts, and public discussions involving residents. These meetings ensured broad participation, inclusive dialogue, and integration of public input into the final commitments.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Youth engagement roundtable (17 January 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1737123560/
Veteran dialogue session “Veterans: Us and the Present” (24 February 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1740473425/
Training on participatory tools (30 April 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1746083325/
Action Plan adoption news (24 December 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1735045871/
Official document – adopted Action Plan: https://orz-rada.gov.ua/docs/1886331/
1.4 Has the action plan been endorsed by the stakeholders of the forum or steering committeeThe Steering Committee is OGP’s executive decision-making body. Its role is to develop, promote and safeguard OGP’s values, principles and interests; establish OGP’s core ideas, policies, and ru.../group?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The final version of the Action Plan was endorsed by members of the multi-stakeholder forumRegular dialogue between government and civil society is a core element of OGP participation. It builds trust, promotes joint problem-solving, and empowers civil society to influence the design, imple..., including representatives of civil society organizations and local self-government, and was formally adopted by the Orzhytsia Settlement Council on 24 December 2024. This endorsement was the result of a transparent co-creation process, which included consultations, public input, and joint agreement on the commitments.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Council Decision OGP -_English
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Action Plan adoption news (24 December 2024): Final approval of the 2025–2026 Action Plan by the Orzhytsia Settlement Council.
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1735045871/
Official document – adopted Action Plan: The full text of the adopted Action Plan is published on the council’s website.
https://orz-rada.gov.ua/docs/1886331/
Section 2.
Recommended practices
in co-creation
2.1 Does the government maintain a Local OGP website or webpage on a government website where information on the OGP Local process (co-creation and implementation) is proactively published?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Orzhytsia Settlement Council maintains an official government website that regularly publishes news and updates related to its participation in the OGP Local initiative. Dedicated announcements, updates about events, adoption of the Action Plan, and key community meetings are available under the “News” section. In addition, the website includes an “Official Documents” section, where formal decisions, council resolutions, and adopted plans, including the OGP Action Plan, are published for public access.
Information is also actively disseminated through the council’s official Facebook page, Telegram channels, and a Viber community group, ensuring broad digital outreach and timely communication with the public. Furthermore, Orzhytsia’s progress, commitments, and updates are publicly accessible through its dedicated profile on the Open Government Partnership’s global website.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
News section: Regular publication of news and event reports.
https://orz-rada.gov.ua/news/
Official Documents section: Provides access to adopted policies and council decisions.
https://orz-rada.gov.ua/docs/1886331/
Telegram community channel:
https://t.me/orz_gromada
Facebook page of the Settlement Council:
https://www.facebook.com/share/19qZBpiHLM/?mibextid=wwXIfr
OGP official profile: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/orzhytsia-consortium-ukraine/
2.2 Did the government provide information to stakeholders in advance to facilitate informed and prepared participation in the co-creation process?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Orzhytsia Settlement Council provided information to stakeholders through early announcements on its website, social media, and in person. Before major consultations and meetings, stakeholders were invited in advance and provided with agendas and background materials. These efforts ensured that participants were informed, prepared, and had sufficient time to engage meaningfully in co-creation.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Strategic session with broad participation (10 October 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1728578253/
School Public Budget training (24 October 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1729755040/
Veteran outreach meetings (March 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1742980262/
News section: Regular publication of news and event reports.
https://orz-rada.gov.ua/news/
2.3 Did the government ensure that any interested member of the public could make inputs into the action plan and observe or have access to decision-making documentation?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Orzhytsia Settlement Council ensured that all interested members of the public could contribute to the development of the Action Plan. Public input was gathered through various formats, including in-person meetings across all administrative units of the municipality (local community subdivisions), focus group discussions with youth, veterans, educators, and an open online survey. Key community stakeholders such as youth representatives, family members of veterans, and active citizens were encouraged to share their ideas, many of which were reflected in the final commitments on youth policy, veteran support, and the school’s public budget.
As part of the outreach process, the council, together with the local civil society organization “Diieva Natsiia”, organized targeted meetings with veterans and families of mobilized or fallen soldiers. Youth engagement was also prioritized, with formal dialogue held through the Youth Council, where young people participated in structured conversations on their role in local governance and priorities for youth development.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Veteran dialogue session “Veterans: Us and the Present” (24 February 2025):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1740473425/
Youth engagement roundtable (17 January 2025):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1737123560/
NGO “Diieva Natsiia” partnership (March 2025):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1742283894/
Veteran outreach meetings (March 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1742980262/
School Public Budget training (24 October 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1729755040/
2.4 Did the government proactively report back or provide written feedback to stakeholders on how their contributions were considered during the creation of the action plan?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Orzhytsia Settlement Council provided feedback to stakeholders throughout the co-creation process. After public consultations, online surveys, and strategic sessions, the results and key proposals were summarized and discussed in follow-up meetings. Stakeholders were informed through public announcements, social media updates, and community meetings about how their input was reflected in the draft and final versions of the Action Plan.
For example, ideas shared by veterans and youth during community dialogues directly shaped commitments on youth development, veteran policy, and school public budgeting. The final Action Plan, adopted on December 24, 2024, was published on the official website, accompanied by clear documentation of its structure and rationale, making the process transparent and traceable for all participants.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Council Decision OGP -_English
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Official document – adopted Action Plan:
https://orz-rada.gov.ua/docs/1886331/
Action Plan adoption news (24 December 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1735045871/
Strategic session announcement and priorities (10 October 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1728578253/
Coordination meeting with experts (14 November 2024): Local governments, CSOs, and national actors finalized commitments.
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1731571734/
Youth engagement roundtable (17 January 2025):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1737123560/
2.5 Was there an iterative dialogue and shared ownership between government and non-governmental stakeholders during the decision making process, including setting the agenda?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The co-creation process featured ongoing dialogue and shared ownership between local government and non-governmental stakeholders. Civil society, youth, and veteran groups were not only consulted but were also engaged in setting priorities and shaping commitments. This process was formalized through a Memorandum of Cooperation with Zviahel and strengthened by participation in national-level open governance events. These interactions helped institutionalize collaboration and ensure joint responsibility for implementation.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Participation in the national dialogue platform (28 May 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1716925926/
Signing of the Memorandum of Cooperation with Zviahel (24 May 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1716817709/
Strategic session announcement and priorities (10 October 2024):
https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1728578253/
2.6 Would you consider the forum to be inclusive and diverse?
Moderately
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The forum and co-creation process included youth, women, educators, veterans, and representatives of marginalized and vulnerable groups. Civil society was actively engaged throughout all planning stages. Special efforts were made to ensure that voices from across the entire community were heard and reflected in the Action Plan.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
Strategic session with multi-stakeholder participation (10 October 2024): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1728578253/
Youth engagement roundtable (17 January 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1737123560/
Veteran dialogue session (24 February 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1740473425/
Veteran outreach in all administrative subdivisions (March 2025): https://gromada.org.ua/gromada/orzhycka/news/1742980262/
Section 3.
Initial evaluation
of commitments
1 CommitmentOGP commitments are promises for reform co-created by governments and civil society and submitted as part of an action plan. Commitments typically include a description of the problem, concrete action... :
Youth Development
1.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment contains clearly defined and verifiable actions aimed at strengthening youth participation in local governance. These include the establishment of a Youth Council at the Orzhytsia Settlement Council, development of policies to support talented youth, organization of a youth festival, and the creation of digital tools (website sections and social media platforms) to support ongoing engagement. Each activity has defined responsibilities, deadlines, and measurable outputs such as approved regulations, the number of events held, or youth engagement indicators, allowing for effective monitoring of implementation.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
1.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevanceAccording to the OGP Articles of Governance, OGP commitments should include a clear open government lens. Specifically, they should advance at least one of the OGP values: transparency, citizen partic... to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment directly advances OGP values by enhancing participatory governance and accountability in youth-related decision-making. It institutionalizes youth engagement through the creation of a Youth Council and supports proactive participation in policy development and local initiatives. By introducing mechanisms such as youth festivals and digital platforms for communication and transparencyAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, transparency occurs when “government-held information (including on activities and decisions) is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the pub... More, the commitment strengthens young people’s ability to influence decisions that affect them and promotes a culture of open dialogue between youth and local authorities.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
1.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulationGovernment reformers are developing regulations that enshrine values of transparency, participation, and accountability in government practices. Technical specifications: Act of creating or reforming ..., policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment introduces new institutional mechanisms and participatory practices to engage youth in local governance formally. The establishment of the Youth Council at the Orzhytsia Settlement Council, the development of support policies for talented youth, and the implementation of new public events and digital engagement tools represent a structural shift in how youth interact with government. These measures did not previously exist in the community and therefore constitute a new policy and institutional arrangement aligned with OGP principles.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
1.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment introduces a binding and institutionalized approach to youth participation in local governance. By establishing a Youth Council with formally approved regulations and measurable responsibilities, integrating youth into policy development, and creating digital tools for regular engagement, the local government commits to sustained, structural changes. These actions are intended to become a permanent part of how the institution engages with young citizens, going beyond ad hoc or one-time activities.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
1.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
To improve the implementation of the Youth Development commitment, it is recommended to ensure that the Youth Council is not only formally created but also provided with clear regulations, an annual action plan. The Council’s composition should reflect diversity, including rural youth, young women, and representatives of different social backgrounds to ensure inclusivity.
Capacity-building sessions and mentorship should be offered to youth members to strengthen their leadership and policy input skills. One foreseeable challenge is the risk of low long-term engagement by young people if the Council’s influence on decision-making is not clearly visible or if its work is seen as symbolic rather than impactful.
2 Commitment :
Developing a Veteran`s Policy
2.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment outlines clearly identifiable and measurable activities, such as the organization of regular consultations with veterans and their families, the creation of Veteran Spaces in the community, and the development of tailored support measures. Deliverables include documented consultation events, physical spaces established for veterans, and strategies or tools adopted to address veterans’ needs. Each activity has responsible parties, timelines, and intended outcomes that can be tracked and reported on.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
2.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment directly supports OGP values of inclusionOGP participating governments are working to create governments that truly serve all people. Commitments in this area may address persons with disabilities, women and girls, lesbian, gay, bisexual, tr... More, participation, and accountability by ensuring that veterans and their families are actively involved in shaping the local policies that affect them. Through regular consultations and the development of dedicated spaces, the initiative fosters transparency in service delivery and creates mechanisms for meaningful engagement with a previously underrepresented group in public decision-making.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
2.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulation, policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment introduces new forms of collaboration between local government and the veteran community. It institutionalizes regular consultations, proposes the establishment of dedicated Veteran Spaces, and creates tools to monitor veterans’ needs and responses. These are new governance practices within the Orzhytsia context and represent a policy and institutional innovation.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
2.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment introduces long-term improvements in how the local government works with veterans. Instead of providing only occasional or informal support, it establishes a structured system for participation, service delivery, and feedback, making the relationship with the veteran community more consistent and sustainable.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
2.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
To improve the implementation of the Veteran’s Policy commitment, it is recommended to adopt a more integrated and holistic approach that links veteran support to broader social services, including mental health, educationAccountability within the public education system is key to improving outcomes and attainment, and accountability is nearly impossible without transparent policies and opportunities for participation ..., housing, and employment. A formal coordination mechanism involving veteran representatives, local authorities, and health and social workers could ensure that services are tailored and delivered effectively.
It is also advisable to map the needs of different categories of veterans and their families and use that data to shape targeted interventions. Another foreseeable challenge is the potential fragmentation of veteran services due to limited coordination between local and national institutions. Since many veteran-related programs (such as healthcare, rehabilitation, and employment) are overseen at the national level, the lack of integration may lead to inefficiencies, duplication of efforts, or gaps in support. Ensuring alignment with national policies and securing intergovernmental cooperation will be essential for successful local implementation.
3 Commitment :
Implementing the School Public Budget
3.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment includes a detailed sequence of verifiable actions with measurable outputs. These include the creation of a working group, development and adoption of local School Public Budget (SPB) regulations, teacher and student training, a public information campaign, pilot implementation in schools, use of electronic voting, and public presentation of results. Each activity is time-bound, has responsible implementers, and delivers clear, trackable outcomes—such as the number of students engaged or projects implemented.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
3.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment promotes the core OGP values of transparency, accountability, and public participationGiving citizens opportunities to provide input into government decision-making leads to more effective governance, improved public service delivery, and more equitable outcomes. Technical specificatio.... It introduces a digital participatory budgeting process in schools, enabling students to propose and vote on school-level projects. This empowers youth to directly influence the use of public resources and encourages an early understanding of democratic governance and civic responsibility.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
3.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulation, policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The School Public Budget is a new initiative in Orzhytsia, inspired by Zviahel’s experience. It includes the creation of a new local regulation, participatory procedures within schools, and formal mechanisms to involve students, teachers, and school administrators in the decision-making process for budget allocation. This constitutes a new policy and participatory practice in the education sector.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
3.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment introduces a formal participatory budgeting process at the school level, to be coordinated by local government and school administrations. Once implemented and regulated, the SPB becomes a regular component of how school communities allocate resources, encouraging transparency and long-term civic engagement in education governance.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
3.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
To improve implementation, it is recommended to strengthen the pedagogical and technical support for schools participating in the pilot. Teachers and school administrators should receive training not only on procedures but also on the values of participation, transparency, and civic responsibility. The electronic voting system should be user-friendly and accessible to students with disabilities or limited digital skills.
A detailed communication plan is needed to engage parents and school staff and explain the purpose and benefits of the initiative. A potential challenge may be a lack of motivation among students if their ideas are not implemented transparently or meaningfully. Ensuring that student-selected projects are actually funded and executed will be critical to sustaining trust and participation.
4 Commitment :
Establishing a Coordination Council
4.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitment outlines specific and time-bound actions, including the development and approval of the Coordination Council’s regulations, establishment of the Council, implementation of a monitoring system, and regular public reporting. Each step has measurable deliverables, such as approved documentation, the number of meetings, and published reports, that make the progress easy to track and evaluate.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
4.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment directly supports OGP values of transparency, accountability, and public participation. By establishing a formal oversight mechanism involving government and civil society, it enhances the transparency of OGP implementation, ensures public monitoring of commitments, and institutionalizes inclusive decision-making practices.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
4.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulation, policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Coordination Council is a new institutional mechanism developed to manage and monitor the implementation of the Action Plan. Its structure, mandate, and operational procedures are formalized through newly created regulations, making this a clear case of institutional innovation aligned with open governance principles.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
4.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The establishment of the Coordination Council embeds a permanent participatory oversight mechanism into the functioning of local governance. Its role in monitoring, reporting, and adjusting the OGP Local Action Plan ensures an ongoing institutional shift toward more transparent, collaborative decision-making processes.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Action Plan Orzhytsia and Zviahel
4.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
To improve the implementation of the Coordination Council commitment, it is recommended to institutionalize the forum through an official regulation or decision that clearly defines its composition, authority, and operating procedures. This will provide continuity beyond political cycles and ensure transparency in its functioning.
Foreseeable challenges include limited administrative capacity to organize regular meetings, ensure equal representation, and document feedback. Additionally, maintaining balanced engagement from civil society, youth, and veterans over time may require continuous outreach and facilitation. Creating a digital participationMany governments are creating online mechanisms for citizens to petition, call for action, and participate in making decisions on issues they care about. Technical specifications: Refers to public p... More platform could also enhance the council’s effectiveness.
Leave a Reply