Skip Navigation

Luxembourg

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 1

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 1

  • Number of Commitments: 6
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Luxembourg is implementing their first action plan.

Contact

Point of Contact

Marc Hostert Service Information et Presse Marc.Hostert@sip.etat.lu

Commitments

  1. Transparent and Open Administration

    LU0001, 2019, Open Regulations

  2. Implement Open Data

    LU0002, 2019, Open Data

  3. Plain Language Commitments

    LU0003, 2019, Capacity Building

  4. Information on National Actions on Climate Change

    LU0004, 2019, Public Service Delivery

  5. Civic Tech Hub

    LU0005, 2019, E-Government

  6. Platform for Protecting Human Rights Defenders

    LU0006, 2019, Civic Space

Resources

  1. Luxembourg – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  2. Luxembourg – Notification of Late Action Plan (Procedural Review) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  3. Luxembourg Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Luxembourg Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Web page

  5. Luxembourg Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  6. OGP Letter – Luxembourg – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Open Contracting
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
4.00 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
4.00 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.75 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.33 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.60 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.65 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.20 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.40 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Participation
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Oversight
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0

Recent Posts

Afghanistan · Burkina Faso · Canada · Côte d’Ivoire · Estonia · France · Germany · Jamaica · Luxembourg · Malawi · Mexico · Mongolia · Netherlands · Pakistan · United States · Uruguay

OGP in the News – #OGP16 Global Summit 2016 Edition

Summit Recap 2016 came to an impressive close for OGP with the 4th Open Government Partnership Global Summit in Paris from December 7-9, which attracted significant interest from media around the world. Set to a backdrop of concerning geopolitical developments…

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!