Skip Navigation

Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Member Since 2014
  • Action Plan 1

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 1

  • Number of Commitments: 7
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Bosnia and Herzegovina is currently implementing 7 commitments from their 2019-2021 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to open data, public procurement, anti-corruption, integrity, proactive disclosure of public data, budget for citizens, and improving public consultations.

Contact

Point of Contact

Selma Džihanović-Gratz Head of the Department for Providing Legal Aid to Civil Society, Ministry of Justice selma.dzihanovic@mpr.gov.ba

Commitments

  1. Open Data on Public Procurement in Bih

    BA0001, 2019, Anti-Corruption

  2. Online Drafting of Integrity Plans

    BA0002, 2019, E-Government

  3. Civil Servant Training Modules

    BA0003, 2019, Anti-Corruption

  4. Open Official Statistics

    BA0004, 2019, Public Service Delivery

  5. CSO Participation in Policymaking

    BA0005, 2019, Public Participation

  6. Institutional Transparency

    BA0006, 2019, Public Participation

  7. Citizens Budget Draft

    BA0007, 2019, Fiscal Openness

Resources

  1. Bosnia and Herzegovina – Letter from Minister of Justice to OGP CEO (December 2017)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  2. Bosnia and Herzegovina – Notification of inactivity status – December 2018

    2019, Letter, Web page

  3. Bosnia and Herzegovina Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Bosnia and Herzegovina Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Bosnia and Herzegovina Letter (Jan 7, 2016)

    2016, Letter, Web page

  7. Bosnia and Herzogovina – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  8. Bosnia and Herzogovina – Steering Committee Resolution (December 5, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  9. Bosnia and Herzogovina Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  10. Late Letter November2016 – Bosnia-Herzegovina

    2016, Letter, Web page

  11. OGP Letter – Bosnia – Nov. 15

    2015, Letter, Web page

  12. OGP Letter – Bosnia and Herzegovina – January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  13. OGP Letter – Bosnia and Herzegovina – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  14. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2015

    2017, Letter, Web page

  15. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. OGP Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.04 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.44 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.10 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.69 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.34 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.80 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.20 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.33 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.28 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.08 Sources

Recent Posts

Albania · Argentina · Armenia · Australia · Azerbaijan · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Croatia · Czech Republic · Denmark · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Estonia · Finland · France · Georgia · Ghana · Greece · Guatemala · Honduras · Indonesia · Ireland · Israel · Italy · Jordan · Kenya · Latvia · Liberia · Lithuania · Malawi · Malta · Mexico · Republic of Moldova · Mongolia · Montenegro · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Romania · Serbia · Sierra Leone · Slovak Republic · South Africa · Republic of Korea · Spain · Sweden · · North Macedonia · Trinidad and Tobago – UNPUBLISHED · Tunisia · · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States · Uruguay

OGP Annual Report 2014

In 2014, the Open Government Partnership (OGP) grew to 65 countries that collectively have developed more than 2,000 policy initiatives to make their governments more open, transparent and responsive to citizens. This was a critical year for many OGP countries…

Albania · Argentina · Armenia · Australia · Azerbaijan · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Croatia · Czech Republic · Denmark · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Estonia · Finland · France · Georgia · Ghana · Greece · Guatemala · Honduras · Indonesia · Ireland · Israel · Italy · Jordan · Kenya · Latvia · Liberia · Lithuania · Malawi · Malta · Mexico · Republic of Moldova · Mongolia · Montenegro · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Romania · Serbia · Sierra Leone · Slovak Republic · South Africa · Republic of Korea · Spain · Sweden · · North Macedonia · Trinidad and Tobago – UNPUBLISHED · Tunisia · · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States · Uruguay

A New OGP Calendar: What Countries Need To Do and When

Last week the Support Unit released the Open Government Partnership activity calendars for all participating countries. The calendars clearly present dates and deadlines for key activities in the OGP process, such as National Action Plan (NAP) drafting, implementation, and assessment.…

Show More
Open Government Partnership