In Italy, the use of EU funds has long been mismanaged. With OpenCoesione and its school program “A Scuola di OpenCoesione”, thousands of students are learning how to monitor EU funds for a more inclusive, participatory, and accountable society.
OGP brought together EU officials, national governments and civil society representatives, gathering three actionable ideas that European leaders can adopt for a strong, inclusive, and sustainable recovery.
The Governments of Canada, Italy and Kenya have been selected by their peers to serve on the OGP Steering Committee starting October 1.
Washington, D.C. – Dans le contexte de la pandémie COVID-19, les gouvernements du Canada, de l’Italie et du Kenya ont été élus par leurs pairs pour siéger pendant trois ans au Comité directeur du Partenariat pour un gouvernement ouvert (PGO)…
Point of Contact
2013, Research Product, Web page
2016, Case Study, Web page
2020, Resource, Web page
2020, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2012, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2014, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2014, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2014, Action Plan, Web page
2014, IRM Report, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
In Italy, the use of EU funds has long been mismanaged. With OpenCoesione and its school program “A Scuola di OpenCoesione”, thousands of students are learning how to monitor EU funds for a more inclusive, participatory, and accountable society.
OGP brought together EU officials, national governments and civil society representatives, gathering three actionable ideas that European leaders can adopt for a strong, inclusive, and sustainable recovery.
Italy’s online platform OpenCoesione publishes both budgets and expenditures of European Union Cohesion Funds and Italian National Funds for territorial development to make public spending more transparent for its citizens.
As we mark 10 years since OGP’s founding, making sure 2021 action plans are born out of an inclusive co-creation process and reflect societal needs is as crucial as ever.
El por qué La cocreación de políticas entre el gobierno y la sociedad civil es la esencia del gobierno abierto. Éste no solo conecta los órganos vitales de nuestra política, sino que asegura su desempeño, circula ideas nuevas y mantiene…
Open Gov Week (OGW) has always been about scaling up our efforts and advancing open government in our communities. But this year, OGW offered a unique opportunity...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish