Skip Navigation

Italy

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Italy is currently implementing 10 commitments from their 2019-2021 action plan.

1. ExecSum – blue-ish11 (2)
Canada · Kenya · Italy

Canada, Italy, and Kenya Elected to Guide the Open Government Partnership

The Governments of Canada, Italy and Kenya have been selected by their peers to serve on the OGP Steering Committee starting October 1.

OGG title graphic no logos

A Guide to Open Government and the Coronavirus

This is a moment of peak uncertainty for governments, civil society and citizens. Facing a unique challenge from the coronavirus, new policies and approaches are being tested in real-time. Many in the open government community are deeply involved...

Contact

Point of Contact

Sabina Bellotti Administrative Innovation, Skills Development and Communication Office, Department for Public Administration s.bellotti@governo.it

Commitments

Resources

  1. Case Study (2013): Italy’s Compass of Transparency

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  2. Case Study: Italy OpenCoesione

    2016, Case Study, Web page

  3. IRM Regional Snapshot: Southern Europe

    2020, Resource, Web page

  4. Italy – Co-Chair Letter of Intent for 2020 Steering Committee Elections

    2020, Letter, Web page

  5. Italy – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  6. Italy Action Plan 2012-2013

    2012, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Italy Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Italy Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Italy Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Italy End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Italy End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Italy End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Italy End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Italy End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Italy End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  16. Italy IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2014, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Italy IRM Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  18. Italy Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  19. Italy Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Italy Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Italy Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  22. Italy Midterm Self-Assessment Report

    2014, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Italy Second Progress Report – Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  24. Italy Third National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Italy, Second Action Plan, 2014-2016

    2014, Action Plan, Web page

  26. Italy’s First IRM Report 2012-2013 – Public Comments Received

    2014, IRM Report, Web page

Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM Reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
Action Plan 2
1
0
1
Action Plan 3
8
2
4
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.42 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.49 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.70 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.09 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.18 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.80 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.41 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.13 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.90 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.84 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.44 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.28 Sources

Recent Posts

collaboration
North Macedonia · Slovak Republic · Germany · Finland · France · Spain · Italy · Latvia · Croatia · Estonia · Romania · Portugal · Netherlands

Cracking Co-Creation: The Why, the How and the What

As we mark 10 years since OGP’s founding, making sure 2021 action plans are born out of an inclusive co-creation process and reflect societal needs is as crucial as ever.

Open Gov Week Recap 2021
Afghanistan · Aragón, Spain · Basque Country, Spain · Bogotá, Colombia · Cataluña, Spain · Chile · Dominican Republic · Indonesia · Italy · Kenya · Mexico · Mongolia · Nigeria · Kaduna State, Nigeria · Latvia · New Zealand · Philippines · Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador · Sierra Leone · Spain · Republic of Korea · Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima, Morocco

Open Gov Week 2021: Co-Create, Implement, Renew

Open Gov Week (OGW) has always been about scaling up our efforts and advancing open government in our communities. But this year, OGW offered a unique opportunity...

Whistleblower Employee
Ireland · Italy · Czech Republic · Estonia · Liberia · Spain

Open Government Reforms Need to Protect Whistleblowers

At its heart, whistleblowing is about speaking up against wrongdoing and corruption. See what OGP members have done to protect whistleblowers.

Show More
Open Government Partnership