Skip Navigation

Montenegro

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 2

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 6
  • Policy Area Focus: Public Service Delivery, Openness of State Authorities, Public Participation

Montenegro is currently implementing 6 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to access to information, citizen participation, public services and anti-corruption.

Point of Contact

Goran Jovetic State Secretary in the Ministry of Public Administration goran.jovetic@mju.gov.me

Commitments

  1. National Identification Document (NID)

    ME0057, 2018, E-Government

  2. E-democracy

    ME0058, 2018, E-Government

  3. Proactive publication of information

    ME0059, 2018, E-Government

  4. Efficient collection of administrative fees

    ME0060, 2018, E-Government

  5. Electronic tax returns

    ME0061, 2018, E-Government

  6. Improved anticorruption policies

    ME0062, 2018, E-Government

  7. Non-governmental participation in the Privatisation Council

    ME0001, 2012, Public Participation

  8. Establishment of electronic enterprise registration

    ME0002, 2012, E-Government

  9. Merging of inspectorates and extracting them from ministries and administration authorities

    ME0003, 2012, Private Sector

  10. Implementation of new building permit legislation

    ME0004, 2012, Private Sector

  11. Establishment of special body to support investment and development projects

    ME0005, 2012, Private Sector

  12. Create e-register of licenses

    ME0006, 2012, E-Government

  13. Adopt regulations for registry maintenance

    ME0007, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  14. Development of an Action Plan with measures to improve regulatory framework in Montenegro

    ME0008, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  15. Quarterly evaluation of implementation of that action plan

    ME0009, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  16. Train civil servants in RIA)

    ME0010, 2012, Capacity Building

  17. Apply RIA in preparation of the Work Programme of the Government

    ME0011, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  18. ‘Full RIA’ is implemented for all laws

    ME0012, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  19. Employment of foreigners reform

    ME0013, 2012, Citizenship and Immigration

  20. Concessions and public-private partnership: Regulatory framework

    ME0014, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  21. Concessions and public-private partnership: Regulation on procedure

    ME0015, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  22. Affirm and advance existing functions of the E-government portal

    ME0016, 2012, E-Government

  23. E-government Portal: More complex electronic services available at the Portal and acceptance of electronic documentation

    ME0017, 2012, E-Government

  24. E-government Portal: Enable citizens to have an active e-participation in creation of laws and other strategic documents

    ME0018, 2012, E-Government

  25. Established online platform for e-petitions

    ME0019, 2012, E-Government

  26. E-petitions: Online platform is made fully efficient

    ME0020, 2012, E-Government

  27. Southeast Europe regional forum

    ME0021, 2012, Capacity Building

  28. Public consultations

    ME0022, 2012, Public Participation

  29. Direct contact with non-governmental organisations

    ME0023, 2012, Freedom of Assembly

  30. Systems to improve direct contact with citizens

    ME0024, 2012, Public Participation

  31. Free access to information

    ME0025, 2012, Legislation & Regulation

  32. Plain administrative language

    ME0026, 2012, Capacity Building

  33. Preventing conflicts of interest: Raising public awareness

    ME0027, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  34. Preventing conflicts of interest: Training for public officers and public campaigns

    ME0028, 2012, Capacity Building

  35. Preventing conflicts of interest: Political independency of the Commission for Prevention of the Conflict of Interest

    ME0029, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  36. Strengthening integrity

    ME0030, 2012, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  37. Application of code of ethics: Establish an Ethical Board, as an independent body

    ME0031, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  38. Application of code of ethics: Code of Ethics training for civil servants

    ME0032, 2012, Capacity Building

  39. Application of code of ethics: Ensure application of the Code of Ethics through operation of disciplinary bodies and periodic check

    ME0033, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  40. Application of code of ethics: Strengthen Tax Administration and CustomsAdministration internal control mechanisms

    ME0034, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  41. Transparency of criteria for employment, bonuses, and promotion in the public sector

    ME0035, 2012, Conflicts of Interest

  42. Reporting on unpermitted building construction

    ME0036, 2012, Infrastructure & Transport

  43. Protection of persons reporting corruption

    ME0037, 2012, Defending Journalists and Activists

  44. Procurement corruption: Help desk

    ME0038, 2012, Open Contracting and Procurement

  45. Procurement corruption: Regulation and awareness-raising

    ME0039, 2012, Open Contracting and Procurement

  46. Establishing central public procurement bodies

    ME0040, 2012, Open Contracting and Procurement

  47. Electronic public procurement system

    ME0041, 2012, E-Government

  48. Budget transparency: Amend the organic Law on Budget with precise deadlines and specific fiscal rules

    ME0042, 2012, Fiscal Transparency

  49. Budget transparency: Presentation of the annual budget and its revisions in a visually comprehensible and simple manner

    ME0043, 2012, Fiscal Transparency

  50. Budget transparency: Identify and develop performance indicators

    ME0044, 2012, Fiscal Transparency

  51. Budget transparency: Amend the Chart of Accounts to improve the expenditure control

    ME0045, 2012, Oversight of Budget/Fiscal Policies

  52. Budget transparency: Improve cooperation between the internal audit system and State Audit Institution

    ME0046, 2012, Audits and Controls

  53. Combatting all forms of discrimination: Carry out activities defined in the signed Memorandum of Cooperation with the NGOs

    ME0047, 2012, Defending Journalists and Activists

  54. Combatting all forms of discrimination: Trainings for police officers for professional conduct with LGBT persons

    ME0048, 2012, Capacity Building

  55. Combatting all forms of discrimination: Trainings for police officers related to disabled persons

    ME0049, 2012, Capacity Building

  56. Combatting all forms of discrimination: Free-up public traffic areas used by disabled. Define procedures for control of passengers & vehicles

    ME0050, 2012, Human Rights

  57. Combatting all forms of discrimination: Adjust the Security Centre in accordance with disabled persons’ needs and appoint a contact person

    ME0051, 2012, Human Rights

  58. Improving media freedoms

    ME0052, 2012, Defending Journalists and Activists

  59. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

    ME0053, 2012, Private Sector

  60. Support to CSR in Montenegro

    ME0054, 2012, Private Sector

  61. Organisation of workshops on corporate social responsibility

    ME0055, 2012, Capacity Building

  62. Development of manual

    ME0056, 2012, Capacity Building

Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 2

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.00 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.17 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.50 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.00 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.40 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.37 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.80 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.60 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Participation
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Oversight
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Resources

  1. Montenegro – End of inactivity status – December 2018

    2019, Documents, Web Page

  2. Case Study (2013): “Citizens Voice” Pioneering E-Democracy in Montenegro

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  3. June 2017 OGP Steering Committee resolution on Montenegro’s participation in OGP, designated as inactive

    2017, Letter, Web page

  4. Montenegro – End of inactivity status – December 2018

    2019, Letter, Web page

  5. Montenegro – Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  6. Montenegro – Vujica Lazovic – November 2016

    2016, Letter, Web page

  7. Montenegro Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Montenegro IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Montenegro Letter (Jan 7 2016)

    2016, Letter, Web page

  10. OGP Letter – Montenegro – August 2016

    2016, Letter, Web page

  11. OGP Letter – Montenegro – February 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  12. OGP Letter – Montenegro – January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  13. OGP Letter – Montenegro – Nov. 15

    2015, Letter, Web page

  14. OGP Letter to Montenegro Regarding Late Action Plan: August 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  15. OGP Letter to Montenegro Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2015

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. OGP Letter to Montenegro Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  17. OGP Letter to Montenegro Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. OGP Letter to Montenegro Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

Recent Posts

Albania · Argentina · Armenia · Australia · Azerbaijan · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Croatia · Czech Republic · Denmark · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Estonia · Finland · France · Georgia · Ghana · Greece · Guatemala · Honduras · Indonesia · Ireland · Israel · Italy · Jordan · Kenya · Latvia · Liberia · Lithuania · Malawi · Malta · Mexico · Moldova · Mongolia · Montenegro · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Romania · Serbia · Sierra Leone · Slovak Republic · South Africa · South Korea · Spain · Sweden · Tanzania (withdrawn) · North Macedonia · Trinidad and Tobago · Tunisia · Turkey (withdrawn) · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States · Uruguay

Introducing the OGP Explorer

Today OGP is launching a new tool, the OGP Explorer. The core idea behind the OGP Explorer is to give the OGP community – civil society, academics, governments, journalists – easy access to the wealth of data that OGP has…

Montenegro

Faces of Open Government – Vuk Vujnovic

In this section of the OGP newsletter, we feature individuals from government and civil society, and ask them about their experiences. Here is what they have to say:   How does open government make a difference in people’s lives? Open…

Albania · Argentina · Armenia · Australia · Azerbaijan · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Croatia · Czech Republic · Denmark · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Estonia · Finland · France · Georgia · Ghana · Greece · Guatemala · Honduras · Indonesia · Ireland · Israel · Italy · Jordan · Kenya · Latvia · Liberia · Lithuania · Malawi · Malta · Mexico · Moldova · Mongolia · Montenegro · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Romania · Serbia · Sierra Leone · Slovak Republic · South Africa · South Korea · Spain · Sweden · Tanzania (withdrawn) · North Macedonia · Trinidad and Tobago · Tunisia · Turkey (withdrawn) · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States · Uruguay

OGP Annual Report 2014

In 2014, the Open Government Partnership (OGP) grew to 65 countries that collectively have developed more than 2,000 policy initiatives to make their governments more open, transparent and responsive to citizens. This was a critical year for many OGP countries…

Albania · Argentina · Armenia · Australia · Azerbaijan · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Brazil · Bulgaria · Canada · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Croatia · Czech Republic · Denmark · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Estonia · Finland · France · Georgia · Ghana · Greece · Guatemala · Honduras · Indonesia · Ireland · Israel · Italy · Jordan · Kenya · Latvia · Liberia · Lithuania · Malawi · Malta · Mexico · Moldova · Mongolia · Montenegro · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Romania · Serbia · Sierra Leone · Slovak Republic · South Africa · South Korea · Spain · Sweden · Tanzania (withdrawn) · North Macedonia · Trinidad and Tobago · Tunisia · Turkey (withdrawn) · Ukraine · United Kingdom · United States · Uruguay

A New OGP Calendar: What Countries Need To Do and When

Last week the Support Unit released the Open Government Partnership activity calendars for all participating countries. The calendars clearly present dates and deadlines for key activities in the OGP process, such as National Action Plan (NAP) drafting, implementation, and assessment.…

Australia · Azerbaijan · Colombia · Israel · Italy · Kenya · Latvia · Malawi · Malta · Montenegro · Peru · Slovak Republic · Turkey (withdrawn) · Ukraine

Letters Sent to Countries Encouraging Submission of Action Plans

Every two years OGP participating countries are required to submit new National Action Plans (NAPs) which are co-created with civil society. As the largest batch of OGP participants joined in 2012, this has been a particularly busy year for countries…

Show More