Skip Navigation

Brazil

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 11
  • Policy Area Focus: Open States and Municipalities, Transparency and Oversight in Public Services, Open Environmental Data

Brazil is currently implementing 11 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to local open government, open data, open science, climate change and water, legislative transparency and social control to nutritional policies.


Contact

Rogério Vieira dos Reis General Coordinator for Open Government and Transparency rogerio.reis@cgu.gov.br

Commitments


Resources

  1. Brazil – First National Action Plan – 2012-2013

    2012, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Brazil Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Brazil Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Brazil End of Term Self-Assessment 2014-2016 (English)

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  5. Brazil End-of-Term Report 2013-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Brazil End-of-Term Report 2013-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Brazil End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Brazil End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Brazil End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  10. Brazil End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  11. Brazil Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Brazil Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Brazil Mid-Term Self Assessment Report – 2014-2016

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Brazil Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  15. Brazil Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  16. Brazil National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Brazil National Action Plan 2018-2021

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  18. Brazil Progress Report 2011-2013

    2014, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Brazil Progress Report 2013-2014

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Brazil SC Application Letter

    2014, Letter, Web page

  21. Brazil Second Action Plan

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  22. Brazil, Second Self-Assessment Report

    2013, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Case Study (2014): Increasing Corporate Accountability in Brazil

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  24. Late Letter November 2016 – Brazil

    2016, Letter, Web page

  25. OGP Letter to Brazil Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  26. OGP Report Card – Brazil (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  27. What’s in a Name? A comparison of ‘open government’ definitions across seven OGP members

    2017, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
7
2
1
Action Plan 3
1
2
1
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Group with post-its

Closed Democracies in Latin America? Openness at a Crossroads

Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.

GLOW Indonesia

GLOW: Open Parliaments Prove Their Strength In An Unprecedented Year

From the COVID-19 pandemic to the heightening climate crisis to an increase in authoritarian overreach, 2020 has sorely tested the strength of democracies globally. Even while the world continues to reel from the effects of these multiple threats, at least…

Bogota, Colombia (OGP Local)

56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government

OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.

Show More
Open Government Partnership