Skip Navigation

Chile

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2020-2022

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Contact

Claudia Montero Meza Comisión de Integridad Pública y Transparencia, Ministerio Secretaría General de la Presidencia cmontero@minsegpres.gob.cl

Commitments


Resources

  1. Chile Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Document, PDF

  2. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  3. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_Comments-Received.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  4. Chile_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_for-public-comment.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  5. OGP_reportcard_Chile_Jan2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  6. Chile_Plan-de-accion-de-Congreso-Nacional_2017-2018.pdf

    2018, Document, PDF

  7. Chile_Mid-term_Self-Assessment-Report_2016-2018_ES.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  8. U4-Report-2015-02-Chile.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  9. Chile_EoT-Report_2014-2016_for-pub-comment_ENG_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  10. case-study_Chile_Lobby-Law_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  11. Chile_Informe-Autoevaluacion-fin-de-termino_Plan-de-Accion2014-2016_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  12. Chile_Comentarios_Recibidos_0_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  13. Chile_IRM_2014-15_0_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  14. Chile_SC_2015_Letter[1]_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  15. Chile_Plan-de-Accion_2016-2018.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  16. Chile_2012_Eng_Unofficial_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  17. Chile_Final_2012_1_0.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  18. Chile_SC_2015_Letter.pdf

    2017, Document, PDF

  19. OGP-Chile-infographic

    OGP Chile infographic

    2013, Document, PNG

  20. Case Study (2013): Bringing Government Closer to Citizens in Chile

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  21. Case Study: Chile Lobby Law

    2016, Case Study, Web page

  22. Chile Action Plan 2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  23. Chile Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  24. Chile Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Chile Action Plan 2020-2022

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  26. Chile Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Chile Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  28. Chile Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  29. Chile Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  30. Chile End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  31. Chile End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  32. Chile End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  33. Chile End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  34. Chile End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2020, Self Assessment, Web page

  35. Chile Informe Autoevaluación Fin de Término – Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  36. Chile Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  37. Chile Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  38. Chile Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  39. Chile Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  40. Chile Plan de Acción 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  41. Chile Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  42. Chile Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  43. Chile Self Assessment Report 2012

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  44. Chile, Informe de Autoevaluacion Medio Termino, 2014-16

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  45. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  46. Lobby Law in Chile: Democratizing Access to Public Authorities

    2016, Research Product, Web page

  47. OGP Report Card – Chile (2018)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  48. Open government and transparency reform in Chile: Balancing leadership, ambition, and implementation capacity

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  49. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

  50. The social impact of open data in the global south

    2015, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
Action Plan 2
4
0
3
Action Plan 3
4
1
2
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Chile beneficial ownership

Building a Beneficial Ownership Registry Proposal for Chile

One of the key challenges that states face is promoting sustainable economic growth through competitiveness and efficiency. Economists and businessmen have developed tools and strategies to address market distortions and maximize social wellbeing. But citizens and civil society have largely…

Open Gov Week Recap 2021
Group with post-its

Closed Democracies in Latin America? Openness at a Crossroads

Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.

GLOW Indonesia

GLOW: Open Parliaments Prove Their Strength In An Unprecedented Year

From the COVID-19 pandemic to the heightening climate crisis to an increase in authoritarian overreach, 2020 has sorely tested the strength of democracies globally. Even while the world continues to reel from the effects of these multiple threats, at least…

Show More
Open Government Partnership