Skip Navigation

Mongolia

  • Member Since 2013
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2021-2023

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 9
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Mongolia is currently implementing 9 commitments from their 2021-2023 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to extractive transparency and beneficial ownership, open contracting, fiscal openness and civic space.


OpenStories for OGP site

OpenStories

Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.

Extractives Indonesia –

Four Ways Beneficial Ownership Transparency Can Benefit the Extractive Industries and Beyond

See how OGP members are making progress on beneficial ownership transparency, a key tool for combating tax evasion and stopping illicit financial flows.


Contact

Point of Contact

Duurenbayar Cabinet Secretariat of Mongolia duurenbayar@cabinet.gov.mn

Commitments


Resources

  1. Mongolia – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  2. Mongolia – Letter Regarding Status (July 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  3. Mongolia – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  4. Mongolia – Under Review Letter (September 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  5. Mongolia 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  6. Mongolia Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Mongolia Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Mongolia Action Plan 2021-2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Mongolia Action Plan Review 2021-2023

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Mongolia Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Mongolia Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Mongolia Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Mongolia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Mongolia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Mongolia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Mongolia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  17. Mongolia End-of-Term Self Assessment 2014-2016

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  18. Mongolia First Action Plan 2014-2016 – Annex

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Mongolia IRM Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Mongolia Late Self-Assessment Report Letter – March 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  21. Mongolia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Mongolia Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  23. Mongolia Midterm Self-Assessment Report

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  24. Mongolia Transitional Results Report 2019-2021

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  25. Mongolia Transitional Results Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  26. Mongolia, First Action Plan, 2014-16

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  27. OGP Letter – Mongolia – April 2014

    2015, Letter, Web page

  28. OGP Letter to Mongolia Regarding Late Action Plan: April 2014

    2017, Letter, Web page

  29. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
3
0
3
Action Plan 2
3
0
1
Action Plan 3
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

adrian-hartanto-SspHIqF_tUA-unsplash

Civic Space and Open Government Reform in Asia and the Pacific

Now more than ever, it is critical that countries in the region address civic space restrictions both through the OGP framework and beyond. Here are a few actions to take.

Diverse team of creative millennial coworkers in a startup brainstorming strategies

OGP’s Approach to Peer Exchange: The Example of Beneficial Ownership

Peer exchange is an essential component of the OGP model. Learn how it can inspire reformers, provide a safe space for discussing common challenges, serve as a platform of joint problem solving, and strengthen the sense of community among reformers.

Open Gov Week Recap 2021
Extractives Indonesia –

Four Ways Beneficial Ownership Transparency Can Benefit the Extractive Industries and Beyond

See how OGP members are making progress on beneficial ownership transparency, a key tool for combating tax evasion and stopping illicit financial flows.

The Mongolian Education Agency holds a meeting of local stakeholders in Khovd.

Featured Commitment: Participation in Public Procurement Processes

Read how Mongolia plans to improve transparency and public oversight of the public procurement process through an online portal. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.

Show More
Open Government Partnership