
Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
2021-2023
Action Plan 2
Portugal’s promising commitment on transparency of COVID-19 recovery and resilience funding could strengthen openness in procurement and introduce important civic monitoring mechanisms. Following an improved participatory co-creation process, effective multistakeholder engagement could enhance ambition and precisely identify the open government results of commitments during implementation of the action plan.
Portugal’s second action plan contains nine commitments focusing on e-government initiatives, open data and increased access to information, beneficial ownership, public spending, education, and cybersecurity.
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
Point of Contact
General contact at Administrative Modernization Agency: ogp@ama.pt
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, Resource, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web Page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Freedom of expression is an important sign of a thriving democracy, including across constantly emerging digital platforms and social media.
Una señal importante de una democracia próspera es cuando los ciudadanos tienen la libertad de expresarse sin temor a la persecución y esto incluye la expresión a través de plataformas digitales y redes sociales constantemente emergentes que ahora conectan a…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close