2022-2024
Action Plan 5
Uruguay’s fifth action plan is the result of a robust and highly participatory co-creation process. This plan engaged the three government branches: Executive, Legislature and Judiciary – representing advances toward an open State. Commitments included in the action plan are grouped under four thematic areas: efficient and open to citizen monitoring public administration; citizen participation and equality policies; environmental protection and surveillance, and land planning; and actions toward an open State. The IRM acknowledges the country’s efforts made to address the recommendations made to the previous action plan: strengthening civil society participation and monitoring; incorporating accountability into a greater number of commitments; engaging the private sector and moving toward openness in all three government branches. The IRM recommends strengthening and continuing to support these areas.
Uruguay’s fifth action plan includes 29 commitments. The IRM grouped 15 of such commitments in 6 thematic groups, as explained in section III and annex 1. This grouping resulted in 20 commitments that help Uruguay advance toward an open State. The plan includes two commitments by the Legislature (an added value of this plan); one by the Judiciary; and three by local governments. (More)
Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Uruguay is implementing commitments from its fifth open government action plan, engaging a wide range of stakeholders including government agencies, civil society organizations...
Uruguay está implementando los compromisos de su quinto plan de acción de gobierno abierto, involucrando una multitud de actores como agencias de gobierno, organizaciones de sociedad civil, academia, ciudadanía y demás. En anticipación de la Semana de Gobierno Abierto, Daniel Carranza ...
Uruguay’s citizens were not able to fully understand the healthcare system and the choices it provided them. To fix this, an easy-to-use website empowered citizens in their decisions.
2025, IRM Report, Web page
2025, Self Assessment, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Perspective, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Case Study, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
2015, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
In this interview, Virginia Pardo, Director of the Information Society Department at the Agency for Electronic Government and Information and Knowledge Society (AGESIC) in Uruguay, shares how innovative and transparent digital services are designed to meet public needs.
In this episode, Helena Suárez Val shares her journey of recording victims of gender-based violence and how data can change public perception.
Anabel reflects on her experience working with civil society and Latin America globally, and her vision for the partnership's next decade.
Anabel reflexiona sobre su experiencia de trabajo con la sociedad civil y América Latina a nivel mundial, y su visión de la próxima década de la asociación.
Uruguay is implementing commitments from its fifth open government action plan, engaging a wide range of stakeholders including government agencies, civil society organizations...
Uruguay está implementando los compromisos de su quinto plan de acción de gobierno abierto, involucrando una multitud de actores como agencias de gobierno, organizaciones de sociedad civil, academia, ciudadanía y demás. En anticipación de la Semana de Gobierno Abierto, Daniel Carranza ...
Uruguay’s citizens were not able to fully understand the healthcare system and the choices it provided them. To fix this, an easy-to-use website empowered citizens in their decisions.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close