
Giving Citizens a Say in Clean Water
In Uruguay, citizens and the government develop an integrated and collaborative approach to water management.
2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Uruguay joined OGP in 2011. They are currently implementing 39 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to the environment, anti-corruption, access to information, inclusion, open justice, local governments and health.
In Uruguay, citizens and the government develop an integrated and collaborative approach to water management.
In Uruguay, the A Tu Servicio platform publishes vital healthcare information, empowering citizens to take control of their healthcare choices.
Uruguay’s Fourth Open Government Action Plan Strengthening democracy requires ongoing work and the willingness to take up new challenges and to recognize the value of collective knowledge. Efforts made by the State to promote transparency, participation, justice, and the protection…
4to Plan de Acción de Gobierno Abierto en Uruguay Fortalecer la democracia requiere una construcción continua, impulsar cambios, estar abiertos a asumir nuevos desafíos y reconocer el valor del conocimiento colectivo. Nunca son suficientes los esfuerzos que se deben realizar…
Point of Contact
UY0099, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0100, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0101, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0102, 2018, Fiscal Openness
UY0103, 2018, Gender
UY0104, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0105, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UY0106, 2018,
UY0107, 2018, Sustainable Development Goals
UY0108, 2018, Open Parliaments
UY0109, 2018, Gender
UY0110, 2018, Open Data
UY0111, 2018, Justice
UY0112, 2018, Justice
UY0113, 2018, Justice
UY0114, 2018, Right to Information
UY0115, 2018, Public Participation
UY0116, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0117, 2018, Justice
UY0118, 2018, Gender
UY0119, 2018, Justice
UY0120, 2018, Civic Space
UY0121, 2018, Public Participation
UY0122, 2018, Gender
UY0123, 2018, Gender
UY0124, 2018, Marginalized Communities
UY0125, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0126, 2018, Open Data
UY0127, 2018, Justice
UY0128, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0129, 2018, Fiscal Openness
UY0130, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UY0131, 2018, Anti-Corruption
UY0132, 2018, Labor
UY0133, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0134, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0135, 2018, Public Service Delivery
UY0136, 2018, Digital Governance
UY0137, 2018, Private Sector
UY0088, 2016, Open Data
UY0089, 2016, Civic Space
UY0090, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0091, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UY0092, 2016, Fiscal Openness
UY0085, 2016, Fiscal Openness
UY0093, 2016, Open Data
UY0097, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0098, 2016, Fiscal Openness
UY0094, 2016, Open Data
UY0095, 2016, Open Data
UY0096, 2016, Public Participation
UY0059, 2016, Public Participation
UY0060, 2016, Marginalized Communities
UY0061, 2016, Public Participation
UY0062, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0063, 2016, Justice
UY0064, 2016, Civic Space
UY0066, 2016, Gender
UY0067, 2016, Justice
UY0065, 2016, Civic Space
UY0068, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0069, 2016, Public Participation
UY0070, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UY0071, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0072, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UY0073, 2016, Public Participation
UY0074, 2016, Open Data
UY0075, 2016, Anti-Corruption
UY0076, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0077, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0078, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0079, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0080, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0081, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0082, 2016, Public Service Delivery
UY0083, 2016, Civic Space
UY0086, 2016, Political Integrity
UY0087, 2016, Open Data
UY0084, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
UY0019, 2014, Open Regulations
UY0020, 2014, Capacity Building
UY0021, 2014, Public Participation
UY0022, 2014, Public Participation
UY0023, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0024, 2014, Public Participation
UY0025, 2014, Capacity Building
UY0026, 2014, Public Participation
UY0027, 2014, Public Participation
UY0028, 2014, Right to Information
UY0029, 2014, Right to Information
UY0030, 2014, Capacity Building
UY0031, 2014, E-Government
UY0032, 2014, Open Data
UY0033, 2014, Fiscal Openness
UY0034, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0035, 2014, Open Data
UY0036, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0037, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0038, 2014, Open Data
UY0039, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UY0040, 2014, Anti-Corruption
UY0041, 2014, Public Participation
UY0042, 2014, E-Government
UY0043, 2014, E-Government
UY0044, 2014, E-Government
UY0045, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0046, 2014, E-Government
UY0047, 2014, Private Sector
UY0048, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0049, 2014, Right to Information
UY0050, 2014, Capacity Building
UY0051, 2014, E-Government
UY0052, 2014, E-Government
UY0053, 2014, Marginalized Communities
UY0054, 2014, E-Government
UY0055, 2014, E-Government
UY0056, 2014, Public Service Delivery
UY0057, 2014, Labor
UY0058, 2014, Subnational
UY0001, 2012, Capacity Building
UY0002, 2012, Right to Information
UY0003, 2012, Capacity Building
UY0004, 2012, Public Participation
UY0005, 2012, Open Data
UY0006, 2012, Capacity Building
UY0007, 2012, Anti-Corruption
UY0008, 2012,
UY0009, 2012, E-Government
UY0010, 2012, Labor
UY0011, 2012, E-Government
UY0012, 2012, E-Government
UY0013, 2012, Capacity Building
UY0014, 2012, E-Government
UY0015, 2012, Public Participation
UY0016, 2012, Public Service Delivery
UY0017, 2012,
UY0018, 2012, E-Government
2019, Perspective, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Research Product, Web page
2015, Web page
2015, Case Study, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
See how OGP members are using their action plans to address LGBTQIA+ values and needs.
Desde 2019, la campaña Rompiendo los roles de OGP ha invitado a los reformadores de gobierno abierto a ser más conscientes, estratégicos y ambiciosos en sus esfuerzos por incorporar la perspectiva de mujeres y diversidad de género en sus planes…
In 2018, 22 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean reached a historical milestone in environmental democracy by signing the Escazu Agreement. In 2020, 20 countries have ratified the treaty and one more ratification is missing to make this a…
En 2018, 22 países de América Latina y el Caribe marcaron un hito histórico en la democracia ambiental con la firma del Acuerdo Escazú. En 2020, 10 países han ratificado el tratado y sólo una ratificación más se interpone entre la aspiración y la acción.
Freedom of expression is an important sign of a thriving democracy, including across constantly emerging digital platforms and social media.
Una señal importante de una democracia próspera es cuando los ciudadanos tienen la libertad de expresarse sin temor a la persecución y esto incluye la expresión a través de plataformas digitales y redes sociales constantemente emergentes que ahora conectan a…
Meet Silvana Fumega, a researcher and advocate for open data and feminist open government.
Estaremos arrancando los 16 Días de Activismo en contra de la Violencia de Género, un momento importante para todas las mujeres y defensores de género trabajando para promover comunidades más seguras alrededor del mundo. ¿Cómo podemos usar OGP como una…
The Uruguayan government and civil society are working together to bring more awareness and clarity to the issue of gender-based violence (GBV) by streamlining and publishing key statistics.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close