2019-2021
Action Plan 4
The UK fourth national action plan further advances open data, transparency in contracting, natural resources and grants provision and public participation, as well as commitments in grants data, digital charter, open policy-making, open contracting data, democracy innovations, learnings and exchange in multi-level governance and local transparency.
Point of Contact
2021, Research Product, Web page
2018, Research Product, Web page
2019, Perspective, Web page
2021, Resource, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2011, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2013, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2014, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2014, Letter, Web page
2013, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Algorithmic transparency means different things to different people, but it can be broadly understood as openness about the purpose, structure, and underlying actions of algorithms used to process information.
The UK leads the way with a pioneering beneficial ownership register, in an effort to stem corruption and strengthen measures against money laundering and tax evasion.
At RightsCon 2021, government officials and civil society organizations, including members of the Open Algorithms Network, discussed their experience implementing algorithm transparency ...
Hoy, AI Now Institute, Ada Lovelace Institute y la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) lanzaron el primer estudio de su tipo que analiza la ola de marcos legislativos que promueven la transparencia y rendición…
The Generation Equality Forum (GEF) inspired a collective 40 billion dollars dedicated to accelerating gender equality worldwide, programmatic commitments...
El Foro Generación Igualdad (GEF por sus siglas e inglés) inspiró la movilización de 40 mil millones de dólares dedicados a acelerar la equidad de género en todo el mundo, compromisos programáticos...
Five years after the 2016 London Anti-Corruption Summit, where 43 governments made over 600 pledges to tackle corruption, we reflect on lessons learned on how high-level international events can have a lasting impact on an issue like corruption.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish