Skip Navigation

Mexico

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 13
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Mexico’s 2019-2022 action plan includes 13 commitments, including strategic agendas such as Beneficial Ownership, illegal surveillance and arms traffic. Mexico’s OGP dashboard is here: https://tablero.gobabiertomx.org/


Contact

Mtra. Grethel Alejandra Pilgram Santos Directora General de Transparencia y Gobierno Abierto, Secretaría de la Función Pública grethel.pilgram@funcionpublica.gob.mx

Commitments


Resources

  1. Case Study (2013): Mexico’s Budget Transparency Portal

    2013, Research Product, Web page

  2. Case Study (2014): Encouraging parents’ engagement in public education reform in Mexico

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  3. July 2018: Mexico Letter of Concern

    2018, Letter, Web page

  4. Learning to Open Government: Findings and Reflections on how the OGP is playing out, in practice, in five countries

    2016, Research Product, Web page

  5. Letter from Mexican Civil Society about the Participation in the Commitment ‘Transparency for monitoring and vigilance of trusts’ (Mexico’s 4th OGP Action Plan)

    2020, Letter, Web page

  6. Mexico – Criteria and Standard Report on Mexico Case (May 2, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  7. Mexico – Criteria and Standards Resolution on Response Policy Case (December 12, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  8. Mexico – First National Action Plan – 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Mexico – Government submits response to the letter of concern (November 30, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  10. Mexico – Letter from Mexican Civil Society to the Steering Committee (September 2017)

    2017, Letter, Web page

  11. Mexico – Letter to Government on Findings of Initial Review (August 24, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  12. Mexico – Letter to New Administration Regarding the Response Policy Case – January 10, 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  13. Mexico – New Mexican administration official response to Response Policy case (January 31, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  14. Mexico – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  15. Mexico – Update for the SU on 4th Action Plan Process – April 2018 (Letter and Support Unit Response)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  16. Mexico 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  17. Mexico Action Plan 2013-2015

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  18. Mexico Action Plan 2019-2022

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Mexico Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Mexico Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  21. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2013-2015

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  22. México End-of-Term Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  23. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  24. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  25. Mexico End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. Mexico Final Self-Assessment 2013-2015

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  27. Mexico Late Self-Assessment Report Letter – March 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  28. Mexico Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  29. Mexico Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  30. Mexico Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  31. Mexico Plan de Acción 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  32. Mexico Progress Report 2011-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  33. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2014 – Public Comment Section

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  34. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  35. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  36. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  37. Mexico Response Policy Case – Terms of Reference (September 20, 2018)

    2018, Web page

  38. Mexico Resumes National Open Government Process (March 5, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  39. Mexico Second Self-Assessment 2013-15

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  40. Mexico Self-Assessment Report 2012 (English)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  41. OGP Report Card – Mexico (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  42. Response from Sanjay Pradhan, OGP CEO, to Core Group of Civil Society Organizations of the Open Government Partnership in Mexico

    2020, Letter, Web page

  43. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
12
0
0
Action Plan 3
2
0
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Mexico – Public Care Services – Credit- Matthias Zomer via Pexels

Win-Win: How Improving Public Care Empowers Women

Mexico has conducted a pilot project that highlights the shortcomings of the public care system and how the burden of making up for them falls disproportionately on women. By listening to those most affected, concrete solutions and public policy recommendations are offered to improve care and alleviate gender inequality.

Regulatory Goverance Cover Art

Mexico Must Establish Democratic Controls over State Surveillance

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) calls on the Mexican government and national stakeholders to fully implement surveillance control regulations ...

GEF Illustration banner

Meaningfully Committing to Gender Equality

The Generation Equality Forum (GEF) inspired a collective 40 billion dollars dedicated to accelerating gender equality worldwide, programmatic commitments...

Show More
Open Government Partnership