Skip Navigation

Mexico

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4
OGC_logo_EN_20240912


 
Mexico has joined the Open Gov Challenge with one commitment.
 

| Learn More »

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2019-2022

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 13
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

The fourth action plan brings several lessons since it was developed during the pandemic and in an environment of polarization between the government and civil society. The plan achieved early results in nine of the thirteen commitments, four of them with significant or exceptional achievements. There is evidence of an increase in spaces for citizen participation and improvements in transparency and access to information, as well as more actionable dialogues between civil society and the government. There are still areas for improvement for a fifth plan, such as giving greater specificity and attention to citizen participation mechanisms, incorporating the accountability component in future commitments, and strengthening dialogue and trust between civil society and the government. (More)

America Abierta
Dominican Republic

Open Americas

Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Mexico – Public Care Services – Credit- Matthias Zomer via Pexels
Mexico

Win-Win: How Improving Public Care Empowers Women

Mexico has conducted a pilot project that highlights the shortcomings of the public care system and how the burden of making up for them falls disproportionately on women. By listening to those most affected, concrete solutions and public policy recommendations are offered to improve care and alleviate gender inequality.

Contact

Point of Contact

Irais Graciela Barreto Canales Jefa de la Unidad Social y Responsabilidad Compartida, Secretaría Anticorrupción y Buen Gobierno [email protected]
Ángel Rodríguez Medina Director General de Cooperación Técnica, Secretaría Anticorrupción y Buen Gobierno [email protected]

Commitments

Resources

  1. Mexico – Update on Mexico’s OGP’s Process

    2025, Letter, Web page

  2. Mexico Co-Creation Brief 2024

    2024, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Mexico – Under Review Letter – April 2024

    2024, Letter, Web page

  4. Mexico Results Report 2019-2022

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Mexico Results Report 2019-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  6. End of Commitment Report – Open government culture

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  7. End of Commitment Report – Institutional interoperability through the legal card

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  8. End of Commitment Report – Generate alliances with the municipalities of the State of Mexico to disseminate the use and benefits of access to information.

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  9. End of Commitment Report – State legislation in the area of Everyday Justice

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  10. End of Commitment Report – Strengthening and expansion of the itinerant justice and access to justice programme

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  11. End of Commitment Report – Strengthening democracy

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  12. End of Commitment Report – Strengthening the means of access to public transparency, open data and public interest data

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  13. End of Commitment Report – Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms as a means of access to everyday justice.

    2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  14. Inception Report – Action plan – San Pedro Garza García, Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  15. Inception Report – Action plan – Nuevo Leon (State), Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  16. Inception Report – Action plan – Monterrey, Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  17. Quintana Roo – Letter of Support (2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  18. Action plan – Jalisco, Mexico, 2023 – 2024

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Mexico – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  20. Report on the status of the Open Government Action Plan of the Municipality of Chihuahua

    2023, Resource, Web page

  21. Final Learning Exercise- Action Plan 2021-2022 – Quintana Roo

    2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page

  22. Mexico – OGP Letter of Notification to the Government (January 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  23. Mexico – Letter from CSO Nucleus to Request Rapid Response Protocol (January 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  24. Request for extension of 2022 action plan delivery – Tlajomulco de Zuñiga

    2023, Letter, Web page

  25. Action plan – Nuevo Leon (State), Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  26. End of Commitment Report – Co-create a protocol for adding youth in the political life and decision-making

    2022, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  27. End of Commitment Report – To co-create a budget transparency platform

    2022, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  28. Action plan – San Pedro Garza García, Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  29. Action plan – Monterrey, Mexico, 2022 – 2024

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  30. Inception Report – Action plan – Mexico State, Mexico, 2021 – 2022

    2022, Inception Report, Web page

  31. Inception Report – Action plan – Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2021 – 2022

    2022, Inception Report, Web page

  32. End of Commitment Report – Co-create a citizen’s initiative to reform the State Planning Law with a long-term vision for Quintana Roo

    2022, End of Commitment Report, Web page

  33. Mexico Co-Creation Brief (2022)

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  34. Tlajomulco de Zuñiga – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  35. Nuevo Leon – Monterrey – San Pedro Garza Garcia – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  36. Chihuahua (Municipality) – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  37. Action plan – Tlalnepantla de Baz, Mexico, 2021 – 2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  38. Action plan – Mexico State, Mexico, 2021 – 2022

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  39. Action plan – Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2021 – 2022

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  40. Mexico Design Report 2019-2021

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  41. Quintana Roo – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  42. Mexico State – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  43. Yucatán – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  44. Mérida – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  45. Tlalnepantla de Baz – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  46. Mexico Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  47. Response from Sanjay Pradhan, OGP CEO, to Core Group of Civil Society Organizations of the Open Government Partnership in Mexico

    2020, Letter, Web page

  48. Letter from Mexican Civil Society about the Participation in the Commitment ‘Transparency for monitoring and vigilance of trusts’ (Mexico’s 4th OGP Action Plan)

    2020, Letter, Web page

  49. Mexico – Criteria and Standards Resolution on Response Policy Case (December 12, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  50. Mexico Action Plan 2019-2022

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  51. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  52. Jalisco, Mexico Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  53. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  54. Mexico – Criteria and Standard Report on Mexico Case (May 2, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  55. Jalisco Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  56. Mexico Resumes National Open Government Process (March 5, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  57. Mexico – New Mexican administration official response to Response Policy case (January 31, 2019)

    2019, Letter, Web page

  58. Jalisco, Mexico – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  59. Mexico – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  60. Mexico – Letter to New Administration Regarding the Response Policy Case – January 10, 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  61. Mexico – Government submits response to the letter of concern (November 30, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  62. Mexico End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  63. Mexico Response Policy Case – Terms of Reference (September 20, 2018)

    2018, Web page

  64. Mexico – Letter to Government on Findings of Initial Review (August 24, 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  65. July 2018: Mexico Letter of Concern

    2018, Letter, Web page

  66. Mexico Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  67. Mexico Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  68. Mexico – Update for the SU on 4th Action Plan Process – April 2018 (Letter and Support Unit Response)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  69. Mexico Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  70. Mexico 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  71. OGP Report Card – Mexico (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  72. Mexico – Letter from Mexican Civil Society to the Steering Committee (September 2017)

    2017, Letter, Web page

  73. México End-of-Term Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  74. Mexico End-of-Term Report 2013-2015

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  75. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  76. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  77. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2014 – Public Comment Section

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  78. Mexico Late Self-Assessment Report Letter – March 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  79. Mexico Final Self-Assessment 2013-2015

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  80. Jalisco, Mexico Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  81. Mexico Plan de Acción 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  82. Learning to Open Government: Findings and Reflections on how the OGP is playing out, in practice, in five countries

    2016, Research Product, Web page

  83. Transparencia Mexicana Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  84. Mexico Progress Report 2013-2015

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  85. Mexico Action Plan 2013-2015

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  86. Mexico Progress Report 2011-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  87. Mexico Second Self-Assessment 2013-15

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  88. Mexico – First National Action Plan – 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  89. Mexico Self-Assessment Report 2012 (English)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  90. Case Study (2014): Encouraging parents’ engagement in public education reform in Mexico

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  91. Case Study (2013): Mexico’s Budget Transparency Portal

    2013, Research Product, Web page

Historical Data

The data below represents historical data for this member’s commitments. It does not reflect current work.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
12
0
0
Action Plan 3
2
0
0
Action Plan 4
3
1
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 1

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.00 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.47 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.25 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.95 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.16 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.52 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
4.00 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.99 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.47 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.70 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.28 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.88 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.52 Sources

Recent Posts

Beneficial Ownership money
Nigeria · Armenia · Mexico · Latvia · Kenya · United Kingdom · Norway · Slovak Republic

Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group: Impact, Achievements, and Future Directions

Launched in 2019, the Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group (or the Leadership Group) set out to advance global policy toward open beneficial ownership (BO) data, and achieve concrete progress by 2023. This summary examines the group's achievements, lessons learned by Open Ownership and the Open Government Partnership from co-convening the group, and future directions to advance BO reform.

Parliamentary engagement graphic
Mexico

OGP Steering Committee Statement on Mexico

The undersigned members of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Steering Committee express their deep concern over the reports of alleged illegal digital surveillance against...

Presentacion Comic
Mexico

Three Strategies for Community Justice

Explore three ways advocates in Tijuana, Mexico, are engaging the community and using open justice and artistic approaches to allow citizens to more fully exercise their rights and improve relations between migrants and authorities.

Mexico

Open Parliaments: The Case of the State of Guanajuato, Mexico

Guanajuato is one of the 32 states in Mexico and its State Congress is made up of 36 local congresspeople who represent over 6 million citizens.

Show More
Open Government Partnership