Inception Report – Action plan – Mexico State, Mexico, 2021 – 2022
Overview
Name of Evaluator
Oscar Javier Islas Jiménez
Member
Mexico State, Mexico
Action PlanAction plans are at the core of a government’s participation in OGP. They are the product of a co-creation process in which government and civil society jointly develop commitments to open governmen...
Section 1.
Compliance with
co-creation requirements
1.1 Does a forum exist?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The local government, with the support of non-governmental actors (Ministry of JusticeTo address barriers that prevent citizens from having their justice needs met, OGP participating governments are working to expand transparency, accountability, and inclusion into all systems of justi... and Human RightsAn essential part of open government includes protecting the sacred freedoms and rights of all citizens, including the most vulnerable groups, and holding those who violate human rights accountable. T... in coordination with the Municipality of Tlalnepantla de Baz, the Institute of TransparencyAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, transparency occurs when “government-held information (including on activities and decisions) is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the pub... More, Access to Public Information and Protection of Personal Data of the State of Mexico and Municipalities ( INFOEM), Political Border, México Evalúa and the Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher EducationAccountability within the public education system is key to improving outcomes and attainment, and accountability is nearly impossible without transparent policies and opportunities for participation ... (ITESM), Toluca campus) had a space for participation to develop and review the action plan through the following means:
- Virtual thematic panels
- Open dialogues
- Public consultation
Additionally, there is a forum, which is called the Local Technical Secretariat and is the deliberative space in which government authorities and civil society monitor and comply with the commitments established in the Local Action Plan. The STL is made up of a representative of the Local Guarantor Body (INFOEM), a Representative of the Executive Branch of the State Government (Secretariat of the Comptroller’s Office) and a representative of civil society organizations (Mtro. Oscar Javier Islas Jiménez), in addition to to have the participation of the Electoral Institute of the State of Mexico and the Judicial Power of the State of Mexico, each one with a commitmentOGP commitments are promises for reform co-created by governments and civil society and submitted as part of an action plan. Commitments typically include a description of the problem, concrete action... framed within the PAL.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx/
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUACUIRg8gE&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blRhroZamws&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=3
1.2 Is the forum multi-stakeholder?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
In the open dialogues carried out between the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, INFOEM, the Local Technical Secretariat, civil society organizations and academia, people from the academic field, civil society organizations, the general public, and public employees of the State of Mexico.
In addition, a call was published for the citizens of the State of Mexico and civil society organizations to join in participating in four on line thematics summit. This call was available from October 1 to 15, 2021.
Similarly, the STL is made up of a representative of the Local Guarantor Body (INFOEM), a Representative of the Executive Branch of the State government (Secretariat of the Comptroller’s Office) and a representative of civil society organizations (Mtro. Oscar Javier Islas Jiménez), in addition to the participation of the Electoral Institute of the State of Mexico and the Judicial Power of the State of Mexico, each with a commitment framed within the PAL. Likewise, in the co-creation and follow-up tables of proactive commitments, various civil society organizations that accompany government actors participated.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
• Mesa: Innovación tecnológica para la transparencia pública
Actor encargado de la coordinación: ITESM, Campus Toluca
Fecha: 19 de octubre 2021
Ver el desarrollo de la mesa en:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_tLAQH7PmC7tXMndHa2VNd_
• Mesa: Acceso a la justicia y justicia itinerante
Actor encargado de la coordinación: México Evalúa
Fecha: 22 de octubre 2021
Ver el desarrollo de la mesa en:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9
• Mesa: Justicia cotidiana
Actor encargado de la coordinación: Borde Político
Fecha: 27 de octubre 2021
Ver el desarrollo de la mesa en:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_tcGx43oN9mKqxapzooLPyf
• Mesa: Derecho a la información y rendición de cuentas
Actor encargado de la coordinación: Infoem
Fecha: 29 de octubre 2021
Ver el desarrollo de la mesa en:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_tHBUZaQ_Q8QTbJgrC89Hxs
Open dialogue between Infoem, civil society organizations and academia.
On February 5, 2021, an “Open Dialogue” exercise was organized, which made it possible to reinforce the lines of action proactively proposed by Infoem. For this exercise, people from the academic field, civil society organizations, the general public, municipal presidents and public servants of Obliged Subjects were summoned. The final result of this activity contributed to the actions that the Transparency Guarantor Body will assume in the entity.
Open Dialogue between IEEM, civil society organizations and academia.
Within the framework of the construction of the IEEM Proactive Commitment, the “Study on the Quality of Citizenship in the State of Mexico” was presented, which was carried out virtually, on July 9, 2020. The aforementioned Study It served as a first input for the detection of the problem that was later systematized in the problem tree and to which the proactive commitment would seek to solve. Taking such a document as a reference, on March 5, 2021, the state Electoral Institute convened civil society organizations, academics and members of the Local Technical Secretariat for the “Open Dialogue” exercise, in which the presentation of the platform collectively called Decides IEEM, as a mechanism for interaction with citizens that would allow them to have information on political parties and candidacies that were presented in the 2021 Electoral Process.
1.3 Does the forum hold at least one meeting with civil society and non-governmental stakeholders during the co-creation of the action plan?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Two open dialogues were held, one promoted by Infoem and the other by IEEM.
Four virtual dialogue roundtables were held in which the meetings where members of civil society and non-governmental organizations participated were visualized and through a call to the citizens of the State of Mexico and civil society organizations they were invited to participate. This call was available from October 1 to 15, 2021.
In addition, an online citizen consultation was launched from July 5 to September 3, 2021 in order to gather the opinions of the people regarding the issue of access to justiceAccessible justice systems – both formal and informal – ensure that individuals and communities with legal needs know where to go for help, obtain the help they need, and move through a system tha... More for vulnerable groups, as well as the issue of transparent government. As a result, the participation of 2,790 people was obtained, of which 1,873 sent their proposals regarding the axis of access to justice for vulnerable groups, while 899 participated in the axis of transparent government and another 18 people formulated opinions through the axis of other proposals.
Additionally, the STL has a scheduled and approved calendar of sessions, which are held bimonthly in order to give continuity to the commitments that derive from the Local Action Plan, in accordance with the Methodology for the Construction of the 1st Action Plan of Open Government.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
• https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx/
• https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx/Primer%20Plan%20de%20Acci%C3%B3n%20Local%20de%20Gobierno%20Abierto%20del%20Estado%20de%20M%C3%A9xico.pdf
• https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUACUIRg8gE&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=2
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blRhroZamws&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=3
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVqYDvoaFwo
• https://www.infoem.org.mx/es/contenido/eventos/primer-foro-de-gobierno-abierto
1.4 Has the action plan been endorsed by the stakeholders of the forum or steering committeeThe Steering Committee is OGP’s executive decision-making body. Its role is to develop, promote and safeguard OGP’s values, principles and interests; establish OGP’s core ideas, policies, and ru.../group?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Local Action Plan of the State of Mexico was endorsed and signed by all members of the Local Technical Secretariat, by the Secretary of Justice and Human Rights of the State of Mexico, the Government of Tlalnepantla de Baz, México Evalúa, Borde Politico, ITESM Campus Toluca, and INFOEM. Additionally, prior to the approval of the Plan, it was circulated among the members in order to enrich them with the comments and contributions of non-governmental actors.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
• https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx/
• https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx/Primer%20Plan%20de%20Acci%C3%B3n%20Local%20de%20Gobierno%20Abierto%20del%20Estado%20de%20M%C3%A9xico.pdf
• https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUACUIRg8gE&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=2
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blRhroZamws&list=PLYi4lbIAFu_t95OTrvK_tMUZrRgPcQCd9&index=3
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVqYDvoaFwo
• https://www.infoem.org.mx/es/contenido/eventos/primer-foro-de-gobierno-abierto
Section 2.
Recommended practices
in co-creation
2.1 Does the government maintain a Local OGP website or webpage on a government website where information on the OGP Local process (co-creation and implementation) is proactively published?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The site that contains the information related to the process of correcting the Local Action Plan is https://ogplocaledomex.com.mx; however, it is important to point out that the processes referring to Infoem and IEEM commitments are not hosted on the site.
Provide evidence for your answer:
Provide references here (e.g. interviews):
https://www.infoem.org.mx/es/contenido/iniciativas/gobierno-abierto
https://www.infoem.org.mx/es/contenido/iniciativas/secretariado-tecnico-local
2.2 Did the government provide information to stakeholders in advance to facilitate informed and prepared participation in the co-creation processCollaboration between government, civil society and other stakeholders (e.g., citizens, academics, private sector) is at the heart of the OGP process. Participating governments must ensure that a dive...?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The STL, prior to the approval of the Local Action Plan, shared among the members of the STL, the preliminary version of the PAL in order to enrich it with the comments and contributions of civil society organizations and the other institutions involved. Additionally, participatory roundtables were held to specify the different proactive commitments and the Operational Group was created, which monitors the actions that derive from the different PAL commitments.
2.3 Did the government ensure that any interested member of the public could make inputs into the action plan and observe or have access to decision-making documentation?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Through the Thematic and Participatory Roundtables, civil society organizations and interested parties could make contributions to the PAL commitments. Additionally, the STL shared with all the members (including civil society representatives) the different documents in order to promote the participation of the CSOs involved in the Plan.
2.4 Did the government proactively report back or provide written feedback to stakeholders on how their contributions were considered during the creation of the action plan?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The contributions of civil society were integrated since they are reflected in the content and preparation process of the LAP; however it is considered that it is not clearly noted that the interested parties were informed how their contributions were integrated into the Local Action Plan.
2.5 Was there an iterative dialogue and shared ownership between government and non-governmental stakeholders during the decision making process, including setting the agenda?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
In the open dialogues of Infoem and IEEM, as well as in the two roundtables, an exchange of ideas and proposals was visualized.
The Local Action Plan also includes in the section on Commitments, the establishment of agendas for the fulfillment of the following
The dialogue and the construction of the agreements were carried out in the ordinary sessions of the Local Technical Secretariat, which count as evidence the minutes of the sessions held.
2.6 Would you consider the forum to be inclusive and diverse?
Moderately
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
A citizen consultation was carried out in which the infrastructure of the Caravans for Daily Justice was used so that people from remote and difficult-to-reach communities could have access to it and issue their proposals and recommendations; however, it is considered that this would be an area of opportunity to further include the representation of vulnerable groups or communities or minorities.
Section 3. Initial evaluation of commitments
Strengthening and expansion of the itinerant justice and access to justice programme “Caravanas por la Justicia Cotidiana” (Caravans for Everyday Justice).
1.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The document containing the Open Government Local Action Plan includes a set of commitments by government entity, which contains a series of concrete actions to be carried out.
Additionally, the established objectives and proposed actions of the Caravans for Everyday Justice program are clear enough and include objectively verifiable activities to assess implementation, for example, by expanding the number of caravans, prioritizing their simultaneity and return to the communities, in order to verify the monitoring and completionImplementers must follow through on their commitments for them to achieve impact. For each commitment, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) evaluates the degree to which the activities outlin... More of procedures and services provided
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
1.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevanceAccording to the OGP Articles of Governance, OGP commitments should include a clear open government lens. Specifically, they should advance at least one of the OGP values: transparency, citizen partic... to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The commitments promote citizen participationAccording to OGP’s Articles of Governance, citizen participation occurs when “governments seek to mobilize citizens to engage in public debate, provide input, and make contributions that lead to m... More by generating mechanisms where citizens are interested and involved in making their needs known, so that public policies generate more effective governance and provide solutions to these needs. In the same way, they promote innovation, since the Caravans for Daily Justice program is unique at the national level. This, by integrating the efforts of 24 dependencies and institutions and offering 90 procedures and legal services to remote communities.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
1.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislationCreating and passing legislation is one of the most effective ways of ensuring open government reforms have long-lasting effects on government practices. Technical specifications: Act of creating or r..., policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Caravans for Daily Justice is a public policy of access to justice through the implementation of itinerant justice mechanisms. In addition, they are an action of regulatory improvement and administrative simplification in the current daily justice policy, since they carry out actions that reduce and simplify procedures and services, bringing them closer to remote and difficult-to-access communities, as well as streamlining procedures and reducing requirements. during the procedures that people must follow to access justice.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
1.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The Caravans for Daily Justice are a process of paradigm shift in the mechanisms of access to justice, since it is about bringing the institutions closer to the population that is in remote communities and difficult to access, modifying the fact that the people have to necessarily move to the dependencies. In addition, through these, the mechanisms and procedures for access to daily justice are facilitated.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
1.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
2. Commitment :
Institutional interoperability through the legal card
2.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment has highly defined objectives and specific strategic actions to be followed by the actors that will intervene in the implementation of the interoperability of the legal card. Verifiable activities, which will allow documenting your process, as well as the use of technologies and connectivity between agencies to streamline the provision of procedures and services offered by the Mexican government.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
2.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
2.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulationGovernment reformers are developing regulations that enshrine values of transparency, participation, and accountability in government practices. Technical specifications: Act of creating or reforming ..., policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
2.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
2.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
3. Commitment :
Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms as a means of access to everyday justice.
3.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The purpose of this commitment is clear and palpable, the actions contained are tangible and include verifiable activities for evaluation; among them, the dissemination of alternative means of dispute resolution and daily justice and the professionalization and training in matters of social peace, mediation, conciliation and restorative justice of municipal and state public servants.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
3.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
3.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislation, policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
3.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
3.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
4. Commitment :
State legislation in the area of Everyday Justice
4.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment has a clear and defined purpose with specific actions in the preparation of the governing document on the matter and of easy evaluation. Such actions comply with the principles of the OGP and will allow the participation of the public, private, academic sectors and civil society in general.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
4.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
4.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a new regulation, policy, practice or requirement.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
4.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
4.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
5. Commitment :
Strengthening the means of access to public transparency, open dataBy opening up data and making it sharable and reusable, governments can enable informed debate, better decision making, and the development of innovative new services. Technical specifications: Polici... and public interest data
5.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
The document containing the PAL includes a series of specific actions to be carried out by the actors involved in its implementation. Likewise, the established objectives and the proposed actions are sufficiently clear and include verifiable activities to evaluate their execution, for example, by bringing procedures and services in terms of transparency and access to public information in various scenarios and the continuous improvement of the platforms. public informatics through citizen participation.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
5.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
5.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislation, policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
5.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
5.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
6. Commitment :
Generate alliances with the municipalities of the State of Mexico to disseminate the use and benefits of access to information.
6.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Through the use of ICTs and the organization of itinerant conferences, the aim is to make the public aware of the means to have access to information and accountability. Create collaboration agreements between municipalities and authorities in order to disseminate the agenda for access to public information.
With the foregoing, progress is being made in the implementation of the OGP values in terms of citizen participation, innovation and technology.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
6.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
6.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislation, policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
6.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
6.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
7. Commitment :
Open government culture
7.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
This commitment was assumed by INFOEM and aims to create a state strategy that allows the consolidation of institutional openness among the three levels of government in the State of Mexico, complies with the values established by the AGA by promoting the opening of institutions with the participation of the civil society, also aims to institutionalize a culture of open government through local efforts that are of importance and interest to the AGA.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
7.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
7.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislation, policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
7.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
7.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
8. Commitment :
Strengthening democracy
8.1 Is the commitment verifiable?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
Through the Electoral Institute of the State of Mexico, it is intended to generate a link and rapprochement with the people of Mexico to promote informed and reasoned voting, transparency, citizen participation in the electoral process, and the involvement of the population in public affairs.
With the foregoing, transparency, citizen participation and innovation are encouraged, by including useful and quality information that allows people to intervene in correct decision-making through the use of ICTs.
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
8.2 Does the commitment language/activities clearly justify relevance to OGP values?
Yes
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
8.3 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
a continuation of ongoing practice in line with existing legislation, policies or requirements.
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
8.4 Please select one option that best describes the commitment:
will result in a change of the rules, practices or policies that govern a policy area, public sector and/or relationship between citizens and is binding or institutionalized across government or specific institution(s).
Provide a brief explanation of your answer:
–
Provide evidence for your answer:
–
8.5 Are there any recommended changes to the design of the commitment to help improve its implementation?
Not yet, the commitment is under implementation
English
French
Spanish
Leave a Reply