
Lessons from Reformers: Judicial Officers – Appointment and Accountability
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Point of Contact
SK0126, 2019, E-Government
SK0127, 2019, Open Data
SK0128, 2019, Fiscal Openness
SK0129, 2019, Anti-Corruption
SK0130, 2019, Public Service Delivery
SK0131, 2019, Records Management
SK0132, 2019, Public Participation
SK0133, 2019, Public Participation
SK0134, 2019, Subnational
SK0135, 2019, Open Regulations
SK0136, 2019,
SK0058, 2017, Open Data
SK0059, 2017, Open Data
SK0060, 2017, Open Data
SK0061, 2017, Open Data
SK0062, 2017, Open Data
SK0063, 2017, Open Data
SK0064, 2017, Open Data
SK0065, 2017, Open Data
SK0066, 2017, Open Data
SK0067, 2017, Open Data
SK0068, 2017, Open Data
SK0069, 2017, Legislation & Regulation
SK0070, 2017, Open Data
SK0071, 2017, Public Participation
SK0072, 2017, Open Data
SK0073, 2017, Open Data
SK0074, 2017, Open Data
SK0075, 2017, Open Data
SK0076, 2017, Open Data
SK0077, 2017, Civic Space
SK0078, 2017, Aid
SK0079, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0080, 2017, Anti-Corruption
SK0081, 2017, Anti-Corruption
SK0082, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0083, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0084, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0085, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0086, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0087, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0088, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0089, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0090, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0091, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0092, 2017, Open Data
SK0093, 2017, Open Data
SK0094, 2017, Open Data
SK0095, 2017, Open Data
SK0096, 2017, Open Data
SK0097, 2017, Open Data
SK0098, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0099, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0100, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0101, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0102, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0103, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0104, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0105, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0106, 2017, Capacity Building
SK0107, 2017, Public Participation
SK0108, 2017, Public Service Delivery
SK0109, 2017, Public Participation
SK0110, 2017, Justice
SK0111, 2017, Justice
SK0112, 2017, Justice
SK0113, 2017, Justice
SK0114, 2017, Justice
SK0115, 2017, Justice
SK0116, 2017, Public Participation
SK0117, 2017, Justice
SK0118, 2017, Justice
SK0119, 2017, Anti-Corruption
SK0120, 2017, Fiscal Openness
SK0121, 2017, E-Government
SK0122, 2017, E-Government
SK0123, 2017,
SK0124, 2017, E-Government
SK0125, 2017, E-Government
SK0023, 2015, Fiscal Openness
SK0024, 2015, Open Data
SK0025, 2015, Open Data
SK0026, 2015, Open Data
SK0027, 2015, Open Data
SK0028, 2015, Fiscal Openness
SK0029, 2015, Fiscal Openness
SK0030, 2015, Freedom of Association
SK0031, 2015, Public Service Delivery
SK0032, 2015, Public Service Delivery
SK0033, 2015, Anti-Corruption
SK0034, 2015, Anti-Corruption
SK0035, 2015, Anti-Corruption
SK0036, 2015, Public Service Delivery
SK0037, 2015, Public Service Delivery
SK0038, 2015, Open Data
SK0039, 2015, Open Data
SK0040, 2015, Open Data
SK0041, 2015, Open Data
SK0042, 2015, Open Data
SK0043, 2015, Open Data
SK0044, 2015, Public Participation
SK0045, 2015, Public Participation
SK0047, 2015, Civic Space
SK0048, 2015, Public Participation
SK0049, 2015, Public Participation
SK0050, 2015, Open Parliaments
SK0051, 2015, Civic Space
SK0052, 2015, Justice
SK0053, 2015, Justice
SK0054, 2015, Justice
SK0055, 2015, Justice
SK0056, 2015,
SK0057, 2015,
SK0001, 2012, Open Data
SK0002, 2012, Open Data
SK0003, 2012, Open Data
SK0004, 2012, Open Data
SK0005, 2012, Fiscal Openness
SK0006, 2012, Open Data
SK0007, 2012, Open Data
SK0008, 2012, Fiscal Openness
SK0009, 2012, Anti-Corruption
SK0010, 2012, E-Government
SK0011, 2012, Public Participation
SK0012, 2012, Public Participation
SK0013, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
SK0014, 2012, Public Participation
SK0015, 2012, Open Regulations
SK0016, 2012, Open Regulations
SK0017, 2012,
SK0018, 2012, Open Data
SK0019, 2012, Open Data
SK0020, 2012, Open Data
SK0021, 2012, Anti-Corruption
SK0022, 2012,
2015, Web page
2015, Case Study, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Learn how governments are taking steps to improve prosecutorial transparency and accountability.
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Read how the Slovak Republic is expanding their beneficial ownership work. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.
Lea cómo la República Eslovaca está ampliando su trabajo en el tema de beneficiarios reales. Este compromiso aparece en la publicación " Qué hay en los planes de acción de 2019".
Découvrez comment la République slovaque étend ses travaux sur la propriété effective. Cet engagement est présenté dans la publication « Contenu des plans d'action 2019 ».
Currently we face both a swell of support for open educational resources (OER) and devastating upheaval of our traditional education systems...
Actualmente estamos observando un gran apoyo a los recursos educativos abiertos (REA) y al mismo tiempo un trastorno devastador de nuestros sistemas educativos tradicionales...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close