
Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
2022-2024
Action Plan 5
The Slovak Republic’s fifth action plan includes promising commitments on strengthening the protection of whistleblowers and expanding the number of companies disclosing beneficial ownership information. Existing data control mechanisms will need to be well-resourced to cope with the expectation of rapid beneficial ownership data disclosure. The action plan was adopted by the newly created Multi-Stakeholder Forum (MSF) dedicated to the OGP process.
The Slovak Republic’s fifth action plan covers six policy areas and builds upon work achieved on whistleblower protection, education for participatory policy-making, open data, capacity-building, public participation in the legislative process, and beneficial ownership transparency. (More)
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
Point of Contact
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Letter, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Case Study, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
In this episode, Andrej Leontiev walks us through his experience as an anti-corruption lawyer and the movement for beneficial ownership transparency reform in Slovakia and globally.
As interest and excitement around innovations in citizen participation grows, how can we ensure these innovations are properly embedded within governments to make open government a reality? Check out five insights from a recent workshop.
El 14 de julio de 2022, OGP organizó un taller de intercambio con el fin de compartir experiencias y aprender de quienes se han esforzado por incorporar la participación ciudadana en el gobierno. Al taller asistieron funcionarios y representantes de…
OGP brought together EU officials, national governments and civil society representatives, gathering three actionable ideas that European leaders can adopt for a strong, inclusive, and sustainable recovery.
As we mark 10 years since OGP’s founding, making sure 2021 action plans are born out of an inclusive co-creation process and reflect societal needs is as crucial as ever.
El por qué La cocreación de políticas entre el gobierno y la sociedad civil es la esencia del gobierno abierto. Éste no solo conecta los órganos vitales de nuestra política, sino que asegura su desempeño, circula ideas nuevas y mantiene…
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close