Skip Navigation

Slovak Republic

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2019-2021

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 11
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Contact

Point of Contact

Lucia Lacika Advisor at the Office of the Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development Lucia.Lacika@minv.sk

Commitments


Resources

  1. Bringing Government Data into the Light: Slovakia’s Open Data Initiative, 2011-2015

    2015, Web page

  2. Case Study – Slovak Republic

    2015, Case Study, Web page

  3. Slovak Republic Action Plan 2019-2021

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Slovak Republic Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Slovak Republic Design Report 2017–2019

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2012-13

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2015

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  8. Slovak Republic First Action Plan

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Slovak Republic IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Slovak Republic Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  11. Slovak Republic National Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page

  12. Slovak Republic Second Action Plan 2015-2017

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Slovak Republic Special Accountability Report 2015-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  14. Slovakia Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Slovakia Design Report 2019–2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  16. Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page


Current Data

The following data is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
3
0
3
Action Plan 3
7
0
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

collaboration

Cracking Co-Creation: The Why, the How and the What

As we mark 10 years since OGP’s founding, making sure 2021 action plans are born out of an inclusive co-creation process and reflect societal needs is as crucial as ever.

Bogota, Colombia (OGP Local)

56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government

OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.

[Crop 1]-What’s-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration

Featured Commitment: Publish Beneficial Ownership Data

Read how the Slovak Republic is expanding their beneficial ownership work. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.

Show More
Open Government Partnership