Europe Regional Meeting
The OGP Europe Regional Meeting will take place on October 11-12, 2022 in Rome, Italy.
Current Action Plan
2024-2026
Action Plan 6
- Number of Commitments: 7
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
The 2022-2024 action plan saw early results in two policy areas, with four out of seven commitments completed. The most successful were the commitments on whistleblower protection and open data policy, driven by strong institutional support and cross-sector collaboration. However, political changes in 2023 disrupted the progress of several commitments, highlighting the need for consistent political backing to achieve meaningful implementation. (More)
The Slovak Republic has delivered their 2024-2026 action plan.
Creating OGP’s Future Together – Strategic Planning 2023-2028
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
OpenStories
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
Contact
Point of Contact
Linda Zuzčáková Advisor at the Office of the Government Plenipotentiary for Civil Society Development [email protected]
Resources
- Slovak Republic Results Report 2022-2024
2025, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic Results Report 2022-2024 – For Public Comment
2025, Report Comments, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2024-2026
2025, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2022-2024
2024, Self Assessment, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2024-2026 – For Public Comment
2024, Report Comments, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan 2024-2026 (June)
2024, Action Plan, Web page
- Final Learning Exercise- Action Plan 2021-2022 – Banská Bystrica
2023, Final Learning Exercise, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2022-2024
2023, IRM Report, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Creation of the open government strategy for the city of Banská Bystrica
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- End of Commitment Report – Application of open government in processes of spatial planning, strategic planning, and environmental management
2023, End of Commitment Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment
2023, Report Comments, Web page
- Inception Report – Action plan – Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, 2021 – 2022
2022, Inception Report, Web page
- Action plan – Žilina (Region), Slovak Republic, 2022 – 2026
2022, Action Plan, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan 2022-2024 (June)
2022, Action Plan, Web page
- Žilina (Region) – Letter of Support (2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
- Slovak Republic Transitional Results Report 2019-2021
2022, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
- Slovak Republic Transitional Results Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment
2022, Report Comments, Web page
- Action plan – Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, 2021 – 2022
2021, Action Plan, Web page
- Banska-Bystrica – Letter of Support
2021, Letter, Web page
- Slovakia Design Report 2019-2021
2020, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovakia Design Report 2019–2021 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
- Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019
2020, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovakia Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
- Slovak Republic Action Plan 2019-2021
2019, Action Plan, Web page
- Slovak Republic Design Report 2017–2019
2019, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment
2019, Report Comments, Web page
- Slovak Republic Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2017-2019
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
- Slovak Republic Special Accountability Report 2015-2016
2017, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic National Action Plan 2017-2019
2017, Action Plan, Web page
- Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2015
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
- Slovak Republic End of Term Self Assessment 2012-13
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
- Case Study – Slovak Republic
2015, Case Study, Web page
- Slovak Republic First Action Plan
2015, Action Plan, Web page
- Slovak Republic IRM Progress Report 2012-2013
2015, IRM Report, Web page
- Slovak Republic Second Action Plan 2015-2017
2015, Action Plan, Web page
- Bringing Government Data into the Light: Slovakia’s Open Data Initiative, 2011-2015
2015, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group: Impact, Achievements, and Future Directions
Launched in 2019, the Beneficial Ownership Leadership Group (or the Leadership Group) set out to advance global policy toward open beneficial ownership (BO) data, and achieve concrete progress by 2023. This summary examines the group's achievements, lessons learned by Open Ownership and the Open Government Partnership from co-convening the group, and future directions to advance BO reform.
A Lawyer’s Journey to Unmask Anonymous Companies
In this episode, Andrej Leontiev walks us through his experience as an anti-corruption lawyer and the movement for beneficial ownership transparency reform in Slovakia and globally.
Lessons from Reformers: Judicial Officers – Appointment and Accountability
Learn how OGP members are improving meritorious, transparent judicial appointments and judicial accountability and independence.
Lessons from Reformers: Transparency and Accountability of Prosecutors
Learn how governments are taking steps to improve prosecutorial transparency and accountability.
![[Crop 1]-What’s-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration](https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Crop-1-Whats-in-2019-APs-Cover-Illustration-300x150.png)
Featured Commitment: Publish Beneficial Ownership Data
Compromiso destacado: publicar datos de beneficiarios reales
Engagement en vedette: publication des données sur la propriété effective
Read how the Slovak Republic is expanding their beneficial ownership work. This commitment is featured in the "What's in the 2019 Action Plans" publication.
Lea cómo la República Eslovaca está ampliando su trabajo en el tema de beneficiarios reales. Este compromiso aparece en la publicación " Qué hay en los planes de acción de 2019".
Découvrez comment la République slovaque étend ses travaux sur la propriété effective. Cet engagement est présenté dans la publication « Contenu des plans d'action 2019 ».