Skip Navigation

Nigeria

  • Member Since 2016
  • Action Plan 3

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 3

  • Number of Commitments: 13
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified


Contact

Dr. Gloria Ahmed (Government) Director, Special Duties, Federal Ministry of Finance, Budget and National Planning; and OGP Nigeria National Coordinator gloria.ahmed@ogpnigeria.gov.ng
Uchenna Arisukwu (Civil Society) Civil Society Adviser, OGP Nigeria Secretariat uchenna.arisukwu@ogpnigeria.gov.ng

Commitments


Resources

  1. Nigeria Action Plan 2022-2024

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Nigeria – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  3. 2022 OGP Youth Toolkit

    2022, Guidance Document, Web page

  4. Nigeria Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Parliamentary Engagement in OGP: Learning from the Evidence

    2021, Research Product, Web page

  6. Nigeria Implementation Report 2017-2019

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Nigeria Implementation Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Nigeria Design Report 2019-2021

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Nigeria Design Report 2019-2021 – For Public Comment

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Nigeria – Co-Chair Letter of Intent for 2020 Steering Committee Elections

    2020, Letter, Web page

  11. Nigeria Design Report 2017-2019

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Nigeria Design Report 2017-2019 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  13. Nigeria Action Plan 2019-2022

    2020, Action Plan, Web page

  14. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

  15. Nigeria Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web Page

  16. Nigeria Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  17. Nigeria Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. Nigeria National Action Plan 2017-2019

    2017, Action Plan, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
0
0
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
0
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Youth Episode Podcast Banner

On A Quest to Raise Young Voices

In this episode, Ebenezar Wikina shares how he's dedicated his life to promoting positive change and working to inspire young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.

School inspection in Kaduna, Nigeria
Open Gov weeek – Story Blog

Everyone Has A Story. Together We Have A Mission.

We all have a story about how democracy has affected our lives, our families and friends, our communities, our countries, and the world at large.

Show More
Open Government Partnership