Skip Navigation

Kaduna State, Nigeria

  • Member Since 2018
  • Action Plan 1

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

Show links

Kaduna joined OGP as part of the 2018 cohort. They are currently implementing five commitments from their 2021-2023 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to public service delivery, anti-corruption and inclusion.

Bogota, Colombia (OGP Local)

OGP Local

Through OGP Local, participants can learn how to use open government values such as transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and inclusion to better meet the needs of the citizens they serve.

Contacts

Mr. Tara Jeremiah Wyah Government of Kaduna jeremiah.tara@kdsg.gov.ng

Commitments

Resources

  1. Inception Report – Action plan – Kaduna State, Nigeria, 2021 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  2. IRM Report on Local Action Plans

    2022, Web page

  3. Action plan – Kaduna State, Nigeria, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  4. Kaduna State, Nigeria Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Kaduna State, Nigeria Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2020, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Kaduna State Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Kaduna State, Nigeria – Letter of Intent to Join OGP (March 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  8. Kaduna State National Action Plan 2018-2020

    n/a, Post, Web Page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
0
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Contracting
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Freedom of Association
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Defending Journalists and Activists
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Regulatory Governance
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Access to Information

Right to Information
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Health)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Open Data (Education)
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Participation
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Oversight
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER

Recent Posts

Colombia · Nigeria · Philippines · Romania · Spain · Basque Country, Spain · Iași, Romania · Kaduna State, Nigeria · Nariño, Colombia · South Cotabato, Philippines

Growing the Family of #OpenGov: Introducing the New OGP Local Participants!

Reproductive health in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Women-led data collection in Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Inequality in Austin, Texas. Water service expenses and quality in Kigoma, Tanzania. Lobbying reforms in Madrid, Spain.   These are just a few of the issues that were…

Open Government Partnership