Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.
Point of Contact
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Report Comments, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2020, Letter, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2018, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
2011, Letter, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
As the Civil Society leadership of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Steering Committee, we were extremely concerned about Decree 4-2020 in Guatemala and its likely negative impact on the freedom of association, assembly, and speech throughout the country. We welcome…
Como líderes de la sociedad civil del Comité Directivo de la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés), estuvimos extremadamente preocupados sobre el decreto 4-2020 en Guatemala y el impacto negativo que tendría sobre la libertad…
After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…
Después de la tercera ola de democratización desde finales de los años 70 a los años 2000, América Latina evidenció el crecimiento profesional de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil (OSC) y el reconocimiento legal de la participación ciudadana en…
Governments and judiciaries in Latin America are innovating through the implementation of open government policies in the justice sector.
Según el informe Justicia para Todos del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Justicia, 4.500 millones de personas en todo el mundo sufren de necesidades jurídicas insatisfechas. Preocupados por este diagnóstico, representantes de gobiernos y sociedad civil de todo el mundo…
Si trazamos una línea recta en un mapa, es muy fácil conectar Ecuador con Tanzania, están casi a la misma altura. Ambos países forman parte de lo que se considera el Sur Global, países en vías de desarrollo con sus…
En agosto, muchos miembros de la comunidad latinoamericana de datos abiertos nos reunimos en Costa Rica en el marco de Abrelatam y ConDatos. Aprovechando ese mix de talento, organizamos un espacio de entrenamiento de alto impacto para todos aquellos que…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish