Skip Navigation

Guatemala

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2021-2023

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 12
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Guatemala has delivered their 2021-23 action plan.

America Abierta
Dominican Republic

Open Americas

Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

OpenStories for OGP site

OpenStories

Everyone has a story. Together we have a mission. Explore stories from across the open government community, and submit your own.

Contact

Point of Contact

Jaime Muñoz Flores Director de Gobierno Abierto, Comisión Presidencial de Gobierno Abierto y Electrónico jaime.munoz@transparencia.gob.gt

Commitments

Resources

  1. Guatemala Action Plan Review 2021-2023 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  2. Guatemala Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Guatemala End-of-Term Report 2016-2018

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  4. Guatemala Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  5. Guatemala Action Plan 2021-2023

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Guatemala Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  7. Guatemala Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  8. Guatemala – Letter from CSOs to OGP Steering Committee Regarding Decree No. 4-2020

    2020, Letter, Web page

  9. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

  10. Guatemala Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  11. Guatemala End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  12. Guatemala – Government Response to the Rapid Response Mechanism (November 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  13. Guatemala – Letter of Complaint (October 2018)

    2018, Letter, Web page

  14. Guatemala Mid-Term Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Guatemala Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  16. OGP Report Card – Guatemala (2017)

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  17. Guatemala Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  18. Comunicación Oficial OGP para Guatemala sobre falta de consultación: Abril 2014

    2017, Letter, Web page

  19. Guatemala National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  20. Guatemala Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Guatemala First Progress Report – Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Guatemala – Midterm Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Guatemala Self Assessment Report 2013 (Spanish)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  24. Guatemala Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Guatemala Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Guatemala, Second Action Plan, 2014-2016

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  27. OGP Letter – Guatemala – April 2014

    2015, Letter, Web page

  28. Guatemala Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2011, Letter, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
1
Action Plan 2
1
Action Plan 3
2
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.54 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.24 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.68 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.97 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.12 Sources
Regulatory Governance
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.27 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.60 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.60 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.56 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.76 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.84 Sources

Recent Posts

Group with post-its
Argentina · Brazil · Buenos Aires, Argentina · Chile · Colombia · Costa Rica · Ecuador · Dominican Republic · El Salvador · Guatemala · Honduras · Jalisco, Mexico · Jamaica · La Libertad, Peru · Mexico · Nariño, Colombia · Panama · Paraguay · Peru · São Paulo, Brazil · Uruguay

Closed Democracies in Latin America? Openness at a Crossroads

Democracy is facing challenging times globally and especially in Latin America. In this region, only three countries are considered full democracies and democracy is backsliding overall.

Guatemala

OGP Civil Society Leaders Statement of Significant Concern on Guatemala

As the Civil Society leadership of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Steering Committee, we were extremely concerned about Decree 4-2020 in Guatemala and its likely negative impact on the freedom of association, assembly, and speech throughout the country. We welcome…

43780766892_f09dc0d87f_k
Guatemala · Mexico · Costa Rica · Paraguay · El Salvador · Panama · Honduras · Colombia · Chile · Peru · Dominican Republic · Ecuador

The Challenge Ahead for Latin America: From Participation to Results

After the third wave of democratization from the late 70s to the 2000s, Latin America saw the growth of professional civil society organizations (CSOs) and the legal recognition of citizen participation in public policy decision making. By the time the…

Justicia Abierta
Argentina · Costa Rica · Mexico · Ecuador · Guatemala

Justice For All: Open Justice Moves Forward in Latin America

Governments and judiciaries in Latin America are innovating through the implementation of open government policies in the justice sector.

Show More
Open Government Partnership