Skip Navigation

Indonesia

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 14
  • Policy Area Focus: Environmental Accountability, Health and Education Open Data, Subnational Open Government

Indonesia is currently implementing 14 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to bureaucratic reform, access to public information, data management and public service innovation.

Point of Contact

Maharani Putri S. Wibowo Deputy Director for Institutional and States Aparatus Capacity and OpenGov Indonesia Secretariat sekretariat.ogi@bappenas.go.id

Commitments

  1. Extractives Data Management

    ID0092, 2018, Beneficial Ownership

  2. Transparency and Participation in Health Data

    ID0093, 2018, E-Government

  3. Public Service Data

    ID0094, 2018, E-Government

  4. Participatory Education Budget

    ID0095, 2018, Capacity Building

  5. Participatory Village Government Planning

    ID0096, 2018, Capacity Building

  6. Civic Participation in E-Legislation Portal

    ID0097, 2018, E-Government

  7. Election Data Openness

    ID0098, 2018, E-Government

  8. Health Service Data

    ID0099, 2018, E-Government

  9. Public Consultation Reform

    ID0100, 2018, Capacity Building

  10. LAPOR!-SP4N Quality Improvements

    ID0101, 2018, Capacity Building

  11. Complaint System for Environment

    ID0102, 2018, E-Government

  12. Government Procurement Transparency

    ID0103, 2018, Capacity Building

  13. Strenthening Open Data

    ID0104, 2018, E-Government

  14. Improvements to Legal Aid

    ID0105, 2018, Capacity Building

  15. Open Government Strategic Plan

    ID0047, 2016, OGP

  16. Public Agency Consultation Guidlines

    ID0048, 2016, Capacity Building

  17. Good Governance Manual and Public Consultations to Reach SDGs

    ID0049, 2016, Capacity Building

  18. Geospatial Information Management

    ID0050, 2016, Capacity Building

  19. Monitoring Public Services by Ombudsman

    ID0051, 2016, E-Government

  20. Ombudsman Overseeing Public Services

    ID0052, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  21. Public Services at Ministry of Education and Culture

    ID0053, 2016, Capacity Building

  22. Public Services at Ministry of Religious Affairs

    ID0054, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  23. Development of LAPOR into SP4N

    ID0055, 2016, Capacity Building

  24. Public Complaints Administration Integration into LAPOR!-SP4N

    ID0056, 2016, Capacity Building

  25. LAPOR!- SP4N as Citizen Aspiration and Complaints Platform

    ID0057, 2016, Capacity Building

  26. 1 Million Complaints Via LAPOR! by 2016

    ID0058, 2016, E-Government

  27. LAPOR! Public Accountability

    ID0059, 2016, Public Participation

  28. Interconnectivity of SOEs to LAPOR!

    ID0060, 2016, Capacity Building

  29. Environment and Forrest Sector Public Complaints

    ID0061, 2016, E-Government

  30. Strengthened Village Governance

    ID0062, 2016, Capacity Building

  31. Public Information Disclosure Through Ministry of Health

    ID0063, 2016, E-Government

  32. Public Information Disclosure Through Ministry of Education and Culture

    ID0064, 2016, E-Government

  33. Public Information Disclosure Through Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education

    ID0065, 2016, E-Government

  34. Public Information Disclosure at Higher Education Institutions

    ID0066, 2016, E-Government

  35. Budget Transparency Information System

    ID0067, 2016, E-Government

  36. Inter Agency Data Governance

    ID0068, 2016, Capacity Building

  37. Open Data Implementation

    ID0069, 2016, Capacity Building

  38. Public Complaints Channels

    ID0070, 2016, Capacity Building

  39. Information Disclosure at Village Levels

    ID0071, 2016, E-Government

  40. Increase in Number of Open Data

    ID0072, 2016, E-Government

  41. Improved Public Services

    ID0073, 2016, Capacity Building

  42. Transparency in the Regional Government Budget System

    ID0074, 2016, E-Government

  43. Procurement Disclosure in Bandung

    ID0075, 2016, E-Government

  44. Enhancing the LAPOR! Application

    ID0076, 2016, E-Government

  45. Public Complaints Services in the City of Bandung

    ID0077, 2016, Public Participation

  46. Information Disclosure on Citizens’ Proposals to DPRD

    ID0078, 2016, E-Government

  47. Greater Public Participation in Disseminating Development Information

    ID0079, 2016, Education

  48. "One Data Indonesia” in Semarang.

    ID0080, 2016, Legislation & Regulation

  49. One Data Basis for Semarang

    ID0081, 2016, Capacity Building

  50. Enhanced Public Information Disclosure

    ID0082, 2016, E-Government

  51. Public Monitoring of Services in Semarang

    ID0083, 2016, Capacity Building

  52. Access to Information on DPRD

    ID0084, 2016, Capacity Building

  53. Data Governance of DPRD

    ID0085, 2016, Fiscal Transparency

  54. Infrastructure for Fublic Information Disclosure

    ID0086, 2016, Capacity Building

  55. Public Information Communications Strategy

    ID0087, 2016, Subnational

  56. Information Through Jakarta.Go.Id Portal

    ID0088, 2016, Capacity Building

  57. Public Services Complaint Channel

    ID0089, 2016, Public Participation

  58. Strengthening of Data Governance

    ID0090, 2016, E-Government

  59. Public Participation in Development Planning

    ID0091, 2016, E-Government

  60. Strengthening Transparency Infrastructure of Public Bodies

    ID0028, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  61. Strengthening Infrastructure of Central and Local Information Commission

    ID0029, 2014, Capacity Building

  62. Strengthening Institutional and Human Resources Infrastructure for Public Services

    ID0030, 2014, Public Participation

  63. Improve Quality of Openness in Health Services

    ID0031, 2014, Health

  64. Improve Quality of Openness in Education Services

    ID0032, 2014, E-Government

  65. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Law Enforcement

    ID0033, 2014, E-Government

  66. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Goods and Services Procurement

    ID0034, 2014, Open Contracting and Procurement

  67. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Business Development and Investment Sector

    ID0035, 2014, Capacity Building

  68. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Land Affairs

    ID0036, 2014, Land & Spatial Planning

  69. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Management of Migrant Workers

    ID0037, 2014, Citizenship and Immigration

  70. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Hajj Management

    ID0038, 2014, Public Service Delivery

  71. Accelerate Open and Good Governance Practices in Natural Resources Management

    ID0039, 2014, Environment and Climate

  72. Improve Public Participation in Development Planning

    ID0040, 2014, E-Government

  73. Improve Public Participation in House of Representative and Regional Representative Council

    ID0041, 2014, Legislature

  74. Improve Public Participation in Environmental Preservation

    ID0042, 2014, Environment and Climate

  75. Community Empowerment to Handle Poor Society and People with Disabilities and Special Needs

    ID0043, 2014, Health

  76. Community Empowerment to Support Environmental Sustainability

    ID0044, 2014, Environment and Climate

  77. Community Empowerment to Strengthen Agriculture Sector

    ID0045, 2014, Capacity Building

  78. Community Empowerment to Develop Creative Sector

    ID0046, 2014, E-Government

  79. Motor Vehicle Services

    ID0013, 2013, Infrastructure & Transport

  80. Public School Funding

    ID0014, 2013, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  81. Hajj Services: Ministry of Religious Affairs

    ID0015, 2013, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  82. Marriage Services: Office of Religious Affairs

    ID0016, 2013, Public Service Delivery

  83. Toll Roads

    ID0017, 2013, Public Service Delivery

  84. Land Affairs Transparency

    ID0018, 2013, E-Government

  85. Forest Management

    ID0019, 2013, E-Government

  86. Transparency and Accountability in Natural Resources Management Activity

    ID0020, 2013, E-Government

  87. Oil, Gas, and Mining Revenue Transparency

    ID0021, 2013, Extractive Industries

  88. Appointments of Information and Documentation Management Officials (PPID) in National Agencies and Enactments of their Standard Operating Procedure

    ID0022, 2013, Public Service Delivery

  89. Starred commitment Formulation of a Working Plan and a Well-Operated Tracking System for Business/Investment Licensing Servies in 10 Provinces and 10 Regencies/Cities

    ID0023, 2013, E-Government

  90. Encouraging the Acceleration of the Operational Formation for Information Services in Local Government through the Formation of Local Government's PPID and its Tools

    ID0024, 2013, Public Service Delivery

  91. Encouraging Comprehensive Implementation of Open Government in Pilot Province/Regency/City

    ID0025, 2013, OGP

  92. Integration of Performance-Based Budgeting

    ID0026, 2013, Fiscal Transparency

  93. Ensuring the Publication of Budget Plan (RKA/DIPA)

    ID0027, 2013, Fiscal Transparency

  94. Poverty Reduction

    ID0001, 2011, E-Government

  95. Education Subsidies

    ID0002, 2011, Education

  96. Health Subsidies

    ID0003, 2011, Health

  97. Police

    ID0004, 2011, E-Government

  98. High Corruption Risk

    ID0005, 2011, E-Government

  99. Civil Service Recruitment

    ID0006, 2011, Capacity Building

  100. Land Administration

    ID0007, 2011, E-Government

  101. National Budget Information

    ID0008, 2011, Audits and Controls

  102. District Budget Information

    ID0009, 2011, Fiscal Transparency

  103. e-Procurement

    ID0010, 2011, E-Government

  104. One-Map Portal

    ID0011, 2011, E-Government

  105. Environmental Openness

    ID0012, 2011, Environment and Climate

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
1
Action Plan 3
2
0
0
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 1

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.00 Sources
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.85 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.26 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.13 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.34 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.08 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.60 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.50 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.20 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.93 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.90 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.56 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.88 Sources
Oversight
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
3.40 Sources

Resources

  1. Case Study (2014): Soliciting Citizen Feedback on Public Services in Indonesia

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  2. Case Study: Indonesia One Map Policy

    2016, Case Study, Web page

  3. Implementing SDG16+ Through the Open Government Partnership

    2019, Perspective, Web page

  4. Indonesia – First National Action Plan – 2012-13

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  5. Indonesia – Letter of Candidacy for 2019 Steering Committee Elections

    2019, Letter, Web page

  6. Indonesia Action Plan 2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Indonesia Action Plan 2014-2015

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  8. Indonesia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2013-2015

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2016-2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  12. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Indonesia End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  14. Indonesia IRM Report 2014-2015 – Public Comments Section

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  15. Indonesia Mid-Term Report 2016-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  16. Indonesia Mid-Term Report 2016-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  17. Indonesia Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  18. Indonesia National Action Plan 2016-2017

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Indonesia Progress Report 2011-2012

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Indonesia Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Indonesia Self Assessment Report 2012 (English)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  22. Indonesia Self-Assessment 2014 Annes / Tabel Capaian Rencana Aksi Open Government Indonesia 2014

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2013 (Bahasa Indonesia)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  24. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2014

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  25. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2015

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. Indonesia Special Accountability Report 2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Indonesia Third IRM Progress Report – Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Indonesia Third Progress Report 2014 – 2015 (Final Version, English)

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  29. Remarks by INDONESIA’s VICE PRESIDENT at High-Level OGP Event, 19 September 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

Recent Posts

190531_180746_8574
Canada · Brazil · Mexico · Indonesia

Expanding Inclusion in Open Government for First Nations, Quilombola and Indigenous Women

Since 1995, the 9th of August is commemorated as the International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, to take cognizance of the specific needs of Indigenous communities and First Nations.

Photo for Huff Post privacy blog
Australia · United Kingdom · Latvia · Ukraine · Armenia · Canada · Argentina · Nigeria · Indonesia

Who Owns our Companies: Why Privacy isn’t Always in the Public Interest

At the opening ceremony of the OGP Summit, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau highlighted some of the challenges involved in regulating social media giants like Facebook and Google.  Scandals from Cambridge Analytica and beyond have raised genuine concerns around privacy…

Indonesia

Abriendo el Parlamento de Indonesia

La Cámara de Representantes de la República de Indonesia en coordinación con sus socios declararon el Parlamento Abierto en Gedung DPRI, Jakarta (29/08) Cuando se fundó OGP en 2011, Indonesia entendía que, al adoptar iniciativas de gobierno abierto que impulsaran…

Show More