Skip Navigation

Indonesia

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 7

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 7

  • Number of Commitments: 15
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Indonesia’s seventh action plan includes promising commitments on open contracting, access to justice, and combatting sexual violence. The implementation period offers an opportunity for targeted efforts to strengthen high-level government investment in open government reforms, and ownership from implementing agencies. (More)


Kituo Cha Sheria Legal Advice Centre

Community Justice: Putting People First

From community-based justice centers to alternative justice systems rooted in culture and tradition, learn why community justice models are great open government approaches justice reform.


Contact

Maharani Putri S. Wibowo Deputy Director for State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Transformation, National Development Planning Agency sekretariat.ogi@bappenas.go.id

Commitments


Resources

  1. Indonesia Action Plan Review 2022-2024

    2023, IRM Report, Web page

  2. Indonesia Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  3. Indonesia Results Report 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Inception Report – Action plan – West Sumbawa, Indonesia, 2021 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  5. Inception Report – Action plan – West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, 2021 – 2023

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  6. Indonesia End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2020-2022

    2023, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Inception Report – Action plan – Banggai, Indonesia, 2021 – 2024

    2023, Inception Report, Web page

  8. Indonesia Action Plan 2022-2024

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  9. Indonesia Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  10. Indonesia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  11. Indonesia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  12. Indonesia Action Plan Review 2020-2022

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  13. Indonesia Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  14. Action plan – West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  15. Action plan – West Sumbawa, Indonesia, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  16. Action plan – Semarang, Indonesia, 2021 – 2023

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  17. Action plan – Banggai, Indonesia, 2021 – 2024

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  18. Action plan – Brebes, Indonesia, 2021 – 2024

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  19. Indonesia End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2021, Self Assessment, Web page

  20. Semarang – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  21. West Sumbawa – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  22. West Nusa Tenggara – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  23. Brebes – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  24. Banggai – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  25. Indonesia Action Plan 2020-2022

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  26. Indonesia Design Report 2018-2020

    2020, IRM Report, Web page

  27. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2016-2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  29. Bojonegoro Final IRM Report 2017

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  30. Indonesia – Letter of Candidacy for 2019 Steering Committee Elections

    2019, Letter, Web page

  31. Bojonegoro, Indonesia – Notification of Late Action Plan (Cohort Shift) – January 2019

    2019, Letter, Web page

  32. Bojonegoro Final IRM Report 2017 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  33. Indonesia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  34. Indonesia End-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  35. Indonesia Mid-Term Report 2016-2017

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  36. Indonesia Mid-Term Report 2016-2017 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  37. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2013-2015

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  38. Indonesia Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2017

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  39. Remarks by INDONESIA’s VICE PRESIDENT at High-Level OGP Event, 19 September 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  40. Indonesia End-of-Term Report 2013-2015 – For Public Comment

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  41. Indonesia IRM Report 2014-2015 – Public Comments Section

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  42. Case Study: Indonesia One Map Policy

    2016, Case Study, Web page

  43. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2015

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  44. Indonesia National Action Plan 2016-2017

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  45. Bojonegoro First Action Plan

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  46. IDFoS Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  47. Bojonegoro Institute Endorsement Letter

    2016, Letter, Web page

  48. Indonesia Third IRM Progress Report – Public Comments Received

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  49. Indonesia Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  50. Indonesia Third Progress Report 2014 – 2015

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  51. Indonesia Self-Assessment 2014 Annes / Tabel Capaian Rencana Aksi Open Government Indonesia 2014

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  52. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2014

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  53. Indonesia Progress Report 2011-2013

    2014, IRM Report, Web page

  54. Indonesia Action Plan 2014-2015

    2014, Action Plan, Web page

  55. Case Study (2014): Soliciting Citizen Feedback on Public Services in Indonesia

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  56. Indonesia Action Plan 2013

    2013, Action Plan, Web page

  57. Indonesia Special Accountability Report 2013

    2013, IRM Report, Web page

  58. Indonesia Self-Assessment Report 2013 (Bahasa Indonesia)

    2013, Self Assessment, Web page

  59. Indonesia Self Assessment Report 2012 (English)

    2012, Self Assessment, Web page

  60. Indonesia – First National Action Plan – 2012-13

    2011, Action Plan, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
1
Action Plan 3
2
0
0
Action Plan 4
3
0
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 1

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Faces of Open Gov – Tari Photo

Faces of Open Government: Siti Juliantari Rachman

Meet Siti Juliantari “Tari” Rachman, an anti-corruption advocate in Indonesia. Tari shares how her interest in fighting corruption began and how she’s supporting Indonesia’s OGP commitment to open up contracting information and publish emergency procurement information on the national procurement portal.

SARS Protests

Defending Civic Space: How OGP Can Step Up

There is a major opportunity in 2021 to advance civic space reforms in OGP that go to the heart of some of the democratic backsliding the world has seen in recent years, and to showcase them at the 10th anniversary Global Summit in December of 2021.

Show More
Open Government Partnership