Skip Navigation

Côte d’Ivoire

  • Member Since 2015
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE

Current Action Plan

2018-2020

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Participatory Decentralized Development, Anti-Corruption, Participatory Budgeting

Côte d’Ivoire is currently implementing 10 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to anti-corruption, open budget, and public service delivery.

Point of Contact

Chantal Angoua Conseiller Technique, Ministère de l'Industrie et des Mines ehoumanchantal@yahoo.fr

Commitments

  1. Citizen Budget

    CI0016, 2018, Fiscal Transparency

  2. Participative Decentralized Development for Preschools

    CI0017, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  3. Whistleblower Protection

    CI0018, 2018, Justice

  4. National Integrity Strategy

    CI0019, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  5. Asset Declaration

    CI0020, 2018, Asset Disclosure

  6. Local Participation

    CI0021, 2018, Fiscal Transparency

  7. Local Anti-Corruption Measures

    CI0022, 2018, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  8. Contraception Distribution

    CI0023, 2018, Public Service Delivery

  9. Open Data

    CI0024, 2018, Open Data

  10. Liberalize Television Space

    CI0025, 2018, Civic Space

  11. Publish the Number of Carats of Diamond Exported and Accompanying Kimberly Process Certificates

    CI0001, 2016, Extractive Industries

  12. Create and Operationalize 5 Local Mining Development Committees (CDLM)

    CI0002, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  13. Release All Tax and Customs Regulations

    CI0003, 2016, Fiscal Transparency

  14. Release the Communications to the Councils of Ministers on the Quarterly Implementation of the Budget

    CI0004, 2016, Fiscal Transparency

  15. Publish Communications to the Council of Ministers on Contracting Process on a Quarterly Basis

    CI0005, 2016, Open Contracting and Procurement

  16. Interconnect Public Five (05) Universities and Two (02) Business Schools.

    CI0006, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  17. Set up Virtual University of Côte D'Ivoire

    CI0007, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  18. Install a Virtual Single Window for Public Service Request and Receipt in Order to Facilitate Access to Public Information

    CI0008, 2016, Public Service Delivery

  19. Create and Operationalize an Open Data Portal for Côte D'Ivoire

    CI0009, 2016, Open Data

  20. Set up and Operationalize a National Competitiveness Monitoring Body

    CI0010, 2016, Private Sector

  21. Promote Access to Public Information Act

    CI0011, 2016, Public Participation

  22. Ensure the Freedom the Press and Plurality of Expression

    CI0012, 2016, Civic Space

  23. Set up Five (05) Municipal Committees to Fight Against Racketeering

    CI0013, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions

  24. Promote Participatory Budget in 05 Communes

    CI0014, 2016, Fiscal Transparency

  25. Establish and Operationalize a National Monitoring Body for the Quality of Financial Services

    CI0015, 2016, Public Service Delivery

Resources

  1. Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  3. Cote d’Ivoire End-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  4. Côte D’Ivoire Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  5. Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term IRM Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  6. Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term IRM Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  7. Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2017, Self Assessment, Web page

  8. Côte d’Ivoire Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020

    2019, Self Assessment, Web page

  9. Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI

    2019, Research Product, Web page

Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Download
Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
0
2

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Download
Action Plan 2

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Download
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Download

Anti-Corruption

Beneficial Ownership
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Open Contracting
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.54 Sources

Civic Space

Freedom of Assembly
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.92 Sources
Freedom of Association
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.82 Sources
Defending Journalists and Activists
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.81 Sources

Open Policy Making

Participation in Lawmaking
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
2.29 Sources
Open Regulations
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.20 Sources

Access to Information

Right to Information
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Water / Sanitation)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.80 Sources
Open Data (Health)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.67 Sources
Open Data (Education)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.20 Sources

Fiscal Openness

Transparency
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0.96 Sources
Participation
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Oversight
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
1.24 Sources

Recent Posts

Show More