Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting
The 2022 OGP Africa and the Middle East Regional Meeting is taking place on November 1-3 in Marrakech, Morocco.
Current Action Plan
2020-2022
Action Plan 3
- Number of Commitments: 10
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
Côte d’Ivoire’s third action plan continues reforms in civic participation and transparency in national and local budget processes. The plan also continues to build on ambitious commitments to improve transparency around the assets of high-ranking public officials and civil servants. Looking ahead, greater inclusion of civil society in commitment implementation will raise the ambition of these reforms and strengthen relations between government and civil society.
Côte d’Ivoire’s third OGP action plan consists of ten commitments covering six policy areas. Most commitments stem from the previous action plan, although with renewed focus. Ongoing reforms include open budgets and asset transparency, anticorruption efforts, and reproductive health transparency. New areas include developing legislation for teleworking and school canteen provisions. Strategically, half of the commitments align with the National Development Plan and Sustainable Development Goals, while those considered as promising are linked to support and funding by international partners.
Creating OGP’s Future Together – Strategic Planning 2023-2028
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Design for Results: Introducing the IRM’s First Co-Creation Briefs
This year, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) started rolling out the Co-Creation Brief, a new product that shares lessons from past action plans and open government practice to support reformers in co-designing ambitious and feasible commitments.
Contact
Point of Contact
Mariama Koné
Technical Advisor to the Minister Organization, Ministry of Trade and Industry
ymariamakone@gmail.com
+225 20 25 31 12
Resources
-
Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan 2016-2018
2016, Action Plan, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan 2020-2022
2020, Action Plan, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Action Plan Review 2020-2022 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Co-Creation Brief 2022
2022, IRM Report, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire End-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire Hybrid Report 2018-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Hybrid Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Côte D’Ivoire Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term IRM Report 2016-2018
2019, IRM Report, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term IRM Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
-
Cote d’Ivoire Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire Action Plan Review 2020-2022
2021, IRM Report, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire End-of-Term Report 2016-2018
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
Côte d’Ivoire Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2018-2020
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Data Protection in Africa: A Look at OGP Member Progress
2021, Research Product, Web page
-
Seeking Synergy: OGP & EITI
2019, Research Product, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
0
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Cabo Verde ·
Chile ·
Côte d’Ivoire ·
Czech Republic ·
Denmark ·
Dominican Republic ·
Estonia ·
Greece ·
Indonesia ·
Netherlands ·
Norway ·
Philippines ·
Seychelles ·
Sweden
Design for Results: Introducing the IRM’s First Co-Creation Briefs
This year, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) started rolling out the Co-Creation Brief, a new product that shares lessons from past action plans and open government practice to support reformers in co-designing ambitious and feasible commitments.
Abuja, Nigeria ·
Burkina Faso ·
Cabo Verde ·
Côte d’Ivoire ·
El Kef, Tunisia ·
Elgeyo Marakwet, Kenya ·
Ghana ·
Greater Salt, Jordan ·
Jordan ·
Kaduna State, Nigeria ·
Kenya ·
Kigoma-Ujiji, Tanzania ·
Liberia ·
Makhanda, South Africa ·
Makueni, Kenya ·
Malawi ·
Morocco ·
Nairobi, Kenya ·
Nandi, Kenya ·
Nigeria ·
Plateau, Nigeria ·
Regueb, Tunisia ·
Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana ·
Senegal ·
Seychelles ·
Sierra Leone ·
Shama, Ghana ·
South Africa ·
Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima, Morocco ·
Tunisia
Why Open Budgets, Contracts, and Ownership are Critical to Delivering Public Services in Africa
Now is the time for governments to invest in reforms that can accelerate and improve how they deliver quality education, healthcare, water and sanitation, and supportive infrastructure.
Time to Focus: 10 Years of IRM Recommendations
After 10 years, the IRM is adapting the target and timing of recommendations. Let’s look at how IRM recommendations have evolved over time, what to expect from...
Paving the Way for Strong Implementation: Introducing the IRM’s First Action Plan Reviews
Hacia una mejor implementación: Presentando las primeras revisiones de los planes de acción del IRM
In recent years, we’ve been working to answer the community’s call for a bolder and more engaging IRM through the IRM Refresh. Now, we’re excited to share the first of a series of new products – the Action Plan Review.
En años recientes, hemos trabajado en responder al llamado de la comunidad de tener un IRM más sólido y motivador a través de la actualización del IRM. Hoy, con mucha emoción, compartimos el primero de una serie de productos nuevos en los que estamos trabajando: la revisión del plan de acción
Argentina ·
Buenos Aires, Argentina ·
Colombia ·
Côte d’Ivoire ·
Ecuador ·
Mexico ·
Nigeria ·
Liberia ·
Philippines ·
South Africa ·
Ukraine
Increasing Accountability for Generation Equality Commitments through OGP
This week at the Generation Equality Forum in Paris, governments and partners across sectors will come together to make concrete commitments to move the needle on gender equity and inclusion. The ...
English
French
Spanish