2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Czech Republic is currently implementing 8 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to administrative reform, open justice, anti-corruption, whistleblower protection, open education and open data.
CZ0022, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0023, 2018, E-Government
CZ0024, 2018, E-Government
CZ0025, 2018, Capacity Building
CZ0026, 2018, E-Government
CZ0027, 2018, E-Government
CZ0028, 2018, E-Government
CZ0029, 2018, E-Government
CZ0016, 2016, Anti-Corruption Institutions
CZ0017, 2016, E-Government
CZ0018, 2016, Capacity Building
CZ0019, 2016, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0020, 2016, Civic Space
CZ0021, 2016, E-Government
CZ0007, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
CZ0008, 2014, Anti-Corruption Institutions
CZ0009, 2014, Capacity Building
CZ0010, 2014, Capacity Building
CZ0011, 2014, Labor
CZ0012, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0013, 2014, Capacity Building
CZ0014, 2014, E-Government
CZ0015, 2014, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0001, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0002, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
CZ0003, 2012, Open Data
CZ0004, 2012, Open Contracting and Procurement
CZ0005, 2012, Open Data
CZ0006, 2012, Open Data
The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
For many of your average Janes, Joes, and Jackies, “open government” can seem like a niche topic. Here in Silicon Valley, where I am based, “unicorns” (referring to new startups valued at over $1 billion) and “augmented reality” (a technology-altered…
A series providing a round-up of media attention received by the Open Government Partnership throughout the world. OGP news circulated the globe with OGP’s Steering Committee elections making headlines, OGP discussions occurring throughout Eurasia, and democracy-defending Pirates championing education reform…
A series providing a round-up of media attention received by the Open Government Partnership throughout the world. This week, OGP was featured in stories on all continents, though coverage was strongest in Europe, Africa and Latin America. With regard to…
In 2014, the Open Government Partnership (OGP) grew to 65 countries that collectively have developed more than 2,000 policy initiatives to make their governments more open, transparent and responsive to citizens. This was a critical year for many OGP countries…
Last week the Support Unit released the Open Government Partnership activity calendars for all participating countries. The calendars clearly present dates and deadlines for key activities in the OGP process, such as National Action Plan (NAP) drafting, implementation, and assessment.…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish