
Lessons from Reformers: Legal Aid
Learn how OGP members are improving access to and the quality of legal aid.
Point of Contact
MK0121, 2018, Gender
MK0122, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MK0123, 2018, Public Service Delivery
MK0124, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MK0125, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MK0126, 2018, Fiscal Openness
MK0127, 2018, Anti-Corruption
MK0128, 2018, Public Service Delivery
MK0129, 2018, Fiscal Openness
MK0130, 2018, Open Data
MK0131, 2018, Open Data
MK0132, 2018, Fiscal Openness
MK0133, 2018, Fiscal Openness
MK0134, 2018, Gender
MK0135, 2018, Public Service Delivery
MK0136, 2018, Justice
MK0137, 2018, Justice
MK0138, 2018, Public Service Delivery
MK0139, 2018, Sustainable Development Goals
MK0140, 2018, Fiscal Openness
MK0141, 2018, Open Data
MK0142, 2018, Media & Telecommunications
MK0143, 2018, Public Participation
MK0089, 2016, Open Data
MK0090, 2016, Open Data
MK0091, 2016, Open Data
MK0092, 2016, Open Data
MK0093, 2016, Open Data
MK0094, 2016, Right to Information
MK0095, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0096, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0097, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0098, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0099, 2016, Fiscal Openness
MK0100, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MK0101, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0102, 2016, Public Participation
MK0103, 2016, Fiscal Openness
MK0104, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0105, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MK0106, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MK0107, 2016, Aid
MK0108, 2016, Open Data
MK0109, 2016, Fiscal Openness
MK0110, 2016, Public Participation
MK0111, 2016, Civic Space
MK0112, 2016, Public Participation
MK0113, 2016, Public Participation
MK0114, 2016, Marginalized Communities
MK0115, 2016, Public Participation
MK0116, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0117, 2016, Civic Space
MK0118, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MK0119, 2016, Public Service Delivery
MK0120, 2016, Anti-Corruption
MK0087, 2016, Public Participation
MK0088, 2016, Public Participation
MK0036, 2014, Lobbying
MK0037, 2014, Public Participation
MK0038, 2014, Public Participation
MK0039, 2014, Public Participation
MK0040, 2014, Public Participation
MK0041, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0042, 2014, Public Participation
MK0043, 2014, Public Participation
MK0044, 2014, Public Participation
MK0045, 2014, Public Participation
MK0046, 2014, Open Data
MK0047, 2014, Open Data
MK0048, 2014, Open Data
MK0049, 2014, Open Data
MK0050, 2014, Open Data
MK0051, 2014, Open Data
MK0052, 2014, Open Data
MK0053, 2014, Public Participation
MK0054, 2014, Public Participation
MK0055, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0056, 2014, E-Government
MK0057, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0058, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0059, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0060, 2014, Public Participation
MK0061, 2014, Public Service Delivery
MK0062, 2014, Public Participation
MK0063, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0064, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0065, 2014, Capacity Building
MK0066, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0067, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0068, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0069, 2014, Subnational
MK0070, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0071, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0072, 2014, Public Service Delivery
MK0073, 2014, Anti-Corruption
MK0074, 2014, Civic Space
MK0075, 2014, Public Participation
MK0076, 2014, Public Participation
MK0077, 2014, Public Participation
MK0078, 2014, Subnational
MK0079, 2014, Public Participation
MK0080, 2014, Public Participation
MK0081, 2014, Public Participation
MK0082, 2014, Public Service Delivery
MK0083, 2014, Public Participation
MK0084, 2014, Public Participation
MK0085, 2014, Gender
MK0086, 2014, Public Service Delivery
MK0001, 2012, Public Participation
MK0002, 2012, Public Participation
MK0003, 2012, Public Participation
MK0004, 2012, Public Participation
MK0005, 2012, Public Participation
MK0006, 2012, Open Data
MK0007, 2012, Open Data
MK0008, 2012, Open Data
MK0009, 2012, Open Data
MK0010, 2012, Open Data
MK0011, 2012, Open Data
MK0012, 2012, Public Participation
MK0013, 2012, Public Participation
MK0014, 2012, Public Participation
MK0015, 2012, E-Government
MK0016, 2012, Right to Information
MK0017, 2012, Right to Information
MK0018, 2012, Right to Information
MK0019, 2012, Legislation & Regulation
MK0020, 2012, Right to Information
MK0021, 2012, Right to Information
MK0022, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MK0023, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MK0024, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MK0025, 2012, Justice
MK0026, 2012, Capacity Building
MK0027, 2012, Fiscal Openness
MK0028, 2012, Anti-Corruption
MK0029, 2012, Aid
MK0030, 2012, Open Data
MK0031, 2012, Right to Information
MK0032, 2012, Anti-Corruption
MK0033, 2012, Gender
MK0034, 2012, Public Service Delivery
MK0035, 2012, Public Service Delivery
2016, Case Study, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are improving access to and the quality of legal aid.
This blog is part of IRM Week: A Year in Review. Throughout the week, the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) will share findings and analysis from recent reports through a series of events, report launches blogs, and fact sheets. Learn more here. …
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Lessons from Reformers: The European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), an innovative project on freedom of assembly, assessed seven OGP countries in Central and Eastern Europe for relevant law and practices between 2017 and 2019.
Lecciones de Los Reformadores: El European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), a través de un proyecto innovador enfocado en la libertad de asamblea, realizó una evaluación a siete miembros de OGP de Europa central y del Este en función de una serie de leyes y prácticas relevantes implementadas entre 2017 y 2019.
Leçons à Tirer des Réformateurs : L’European Center for Not-for-profit Law (ECNL), dans le cadre d’un projet novateur sur la liberté de réunion, a évalué sept pays membres du PGO en Europe centrale et en Europe de l’Est quant aux lois et aux pratiques pertinentes entre 2017 et 2019.
The European election of 2019 is said to be a watershed moment that will ask voters to choose between more or less Europe, between inclusion and diversity or exclusion and nationalism, and between societies that are more open or more…
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close