Skip Navigation

Croatia

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 4

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 4

  • Number of Commitments: 16
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Croatia is currently implementing 15 commitments from their 2022-2024 action plan.

This action plan features commitments related to anti-corruption, including whistleblower protection and lobbying; open data; access to information; fiscal transparency; public consultations; and implementation of open government approaches on local and regional levels.


Decade Report_cover

OGP at Ten: Toward Democratic Renewal

When eight governments and nine civil society leaders launched OGP in 2011, no one expected it to reach its current size and scope. Over the last ten years, however, OGP has grown in ways that have exceeded expectations.


Contact

Darija Marić Advisor, Office for Cooperation with NGOs, Government of Croatia darija.maric@udruge.vlada.hr

Commitments


Resources

  1. 2022 OGP Youth Toolkit

    2022, Guidance Document, Web page

  2. Croatia Action Plan 2022-2024

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  3. Croatia – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  4. Croatia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Croatia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Croatia End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2018-2020

    2021, Self Assessment, Web page

  7. Croatia Design Report 2018-2020

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  8. Croatia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  9. Croatia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  10. Croatia – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  11. OGP Letter – Croatia – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  12. Croatia Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  13. OGP Letter to Croatia Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  14. OGP Letter to Croatia Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  15. Croatia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2017, IRM Report, Web page

  16. OGP Letter – Croatia – January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  17. Late Letter – November 2016 – Croatia

    2016, Letter, Web page

  18. Croatia End of Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-16

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  19. Croatia Mid-Term Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  20. Croatia IRM Progress Report 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  21. Open government reforms: The challenge of making public consultations meaningful in Croatia

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  22. Self-Assessment Report – Croatia

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Croatia Action Plan 2012-2013

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  24. Croatia IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  25. Croatia Self-Assessment Report 2013

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page

  26. Croatia SC Application Letter

    2015, Letter, Web page

  27. Improving Government – Civil Society Interactions within OGP

    2015, Research Product, Web page

  28. Case Study (2014): Making election campaign finances public in Croatia

    2014, Research Product, Web page

  29. Case Study (2013): More inclusive and meaningful public engagement on laws in Croatia

    2013, Research Product, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
4
Action Plan 2
4
3
4
Action Plan 3
0
Action Plan 4

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
4
7

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 4

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
New Initiative
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

collaboration

Cracking Co-Creation: The Why, the How and the What

As we mark 10 years since OGP’s founding, making sure 2021 action plans are born out of an inclusive co-creation process and reflect societal needs is as crucial as ever.

Show More
Open Government Partnership