Leveraging OGP Action Plans to Meet EU Membership Requirements
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.
Pushing for Transparency in Pandemic Procurement
Learn how a patient advocacy organization worked to uphold open government values in medical procurement when the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
EU for Integrity Programme for the Eastern Partnership
Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.
Contact
Point of Contact
Diana Doroș
Head of Human Rights and Cooperation with Civil Society Department, State Chancellery
diana.doros@gov.md
Resources
-
Moldova – Under Review Letter (February 2023)
2023, Letter, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Co-Creation Brief 2022
2022, IRM Report, Web page
-
EU for Integrity Programme: Second-Year Snapshot
2022, Web page
-
IRM Snapshot: Locally-Focused Commitments in the Eastern Partnership Region
2022, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova – Response to Contrary to Process Letter (April 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova – Contrary to Process Letter (March 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Transitional Results Report 2019-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
-
IRM Regional Snapshot: Eastern Partnership
2021, Resource, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2019-2020
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Design Report 2019-2020
2020, IRM Report, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Design Report 2019-2020 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Report 2016-2018
2019, IRM Report, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2019, Report Comments, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018
2018, IRM Report, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018
2018, Letter, Web page
-
Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Moldova Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Web page
-
OGP Letter to Moldova Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016
2017, Letter, Web page
-
Moldova National Action Plan 2016-2018
2017, Action Plan, Web page
-
Late Letter – November 2016 – Moldova
2016, Letter, Web page
-
Moldova IRM Special Accountability Report for the 2014 Action Plan
2016, IRM Report, Web page
-
Moldova Action Plan 2012-2013
2015, Action Plan, Web page
-
Moldova Self-Assessment Report 2013
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
-
Moldova Second Action Plan 2014-2016
2015, Action Plan, Web page
-
Moldova IRM Progress Report 2012-2013
2015, IRM Report, Web page
-
Case Study (2013): Realizing the Potential of Open Data in Moldova
2013, Research Product, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Leveraging OGP Action Plans to Meet EU Membership Requirements
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.
New EU Hopefuls Need to Ramp Up the Fight Against Corruption
Against the backdrop of the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, the European Council made a historic decision to grant Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova European Union (EU) candidate status. The EU committed to giving the same status to Georgia, pending fulfillment of a set of conditions.
Virtual Town Hall: Parliaments in Times of Crises
Watch the recording of the first event in a series of conversations on the role of parliaments and representative democracy at large in the Eastern Partnership region.
The EU, OECD and OGP Launch a New Program to Support Open Government Reform in Eastern Partnership Countries
The European Union (EU), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Open Government Partnership (OGP) announce a new assistance programme to support the Eastern Partnership countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine) advance and implement…
A Decade Towards Open Governance: The Latest OGP Results from the Eastern Partnership Countries
Una década hacia la gobernanza abierta: Resultados recientes desde los países de la Asociación Europea Oriental
Armenia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine - joined OGP in 2011. Though different in many ways, these countries shared a strong incentive to use their participation in OGP to address Soviet legacies of opaque and highly centralized governance.
Armenia, Georgia, Moldavia y Ucrania, se incorporaron a OGP en 2011. Aunque son diferentes en muchos sentidos, estos países comparten el incentivo de utilizar su participación en OGP para atender la herencia soviética de la gobernanza opaca y altamente centralizada.
English
French
Spanish