Leveraging OGP Action Plans to Meet EU Membership Requirements
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.
Current Action Plan
2023-2025
Action Plan 5
- Number of Commitments: 6
- Policy Area Focus: Not specified
The Republic of Moldova’s fifth OGP action plan covers priority areas for the country’s accession to the European Union (EU). It features promising commitments on implementation of the new access to information law and improving public participation in decision-making. Active engagement of the lead agencies and consistent collaboration with civil society will be key to successful implementation. (More)
Pushing for Transparency in Pandemic Procurement
Learn how a patient advocacy organization worked to uphold open government values in medical procurement when the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
EU for Integrity Programme for the Eastern Partnership
Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.
Contact
Point of Contact
Mrs. Lilia Pascal Head of Human Rights and Cooperation with Civil Society Department, State Chancellery [email protected]
Resources
- Moldova Letter of Intent to Join OGP Open Parliament
2025, Letter, Web page
- Three-Year Report: EU for Integrity for the Eastern Partnership
2024, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Action Plan Review 2023-2025
2024, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Action Plan Review 2023-2025 – For Public Comment
2024, Report Comments, Web page
- Moldova Action Plan 2023-2025
2023, Action Plan, Web page
- EU for Integrity Programme: Third Year Snapshot
2023, Web page
- Moldova – Under Review Letter (February 2023)
2023, Letter, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Co-Creation Brief 2022
2022, IRM Report, Web page
- EU for Integrity Programme: Second-Year Snapshot
2022, Web page
- Republic of Moldova – Response to Contrary to Process Letter (April 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
- Republic of Moldova – Contrary to Process Letter (March 2022)
2022, Letter, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Transitional Results Report 2019-2020
2021, IRM Report, Web page
- IRM Regional Snapshot: Eastern Partnership
2021, Resource, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment
2021, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment 2019-2020
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Design Report 2019-2020
2020, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Design Report 2019-2020 – For Public Comment
2020, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Report 2016-2018
2019, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2019, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Moldova End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2019, Self Assessment, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Action Plan 2018-2020
2018, Action Plan, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018
2018, IRM Report, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment
2018, Report Comments, Web page
- Republic of Moldova 2017 Late SAR Letter – February 2018
2018, Letter, Web page
- Republic of Moldova Mid-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
- Moldova Letter of Intent to Join OGP
2017, Letter, Web page
- OGP Letter to Moldova Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016
2017, Letter, Web page
- Moldova National Action Plan 2016-2018
2017, Action Plan, Web page
- Late Letter – November 2016 – Moldova
2016, Letter, Web page
- Moldova IRM Special Accountability Report for the 2014 Action Plan
2016, IRM Report, Web page
- Moldova Action Plan 2012-2013
2015, Action Plan, Web page
- Moldova Self-Assessment Report 2013
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
- Moldova Second Action Plan 2014-2016
2015, Action Plan, Web page
- Moldova IRM Progress Report 2012-2013
2015, IRM Report, Web page
- Case Study (2013): Realizing the Potential of Open Data in Moldova
2013, Research Product, Web page
Commitment Performance
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
Key
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
How to Get More Starred Commitments
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Key
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on design
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
Public Participation
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Key
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Definitions
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
OGP Global Report Data
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
Selected Dimensions of Open Government
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
Action implications
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
IRM-based findings
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Third-party scores
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
Anti-Corruption
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Civic Space
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Open Policy Making
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Access to Information
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Fiscal Openness
Action
Implication
Implication
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
Third-Party
Score (0-4)
Score (0-4)
Recent Posts
Call for Proposals: Eastern Partnership “Civil Society Innovations for Open Government” Grants
With the support of the European Union, OGP is launching the “Civil Society Innovations for Open Government” Grants calling for proposals from civil society organisations in Eastern Partnership OGP members, including Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.
Open Gov Challenge: Moldova
Learn more about Moldova's Open Gov Challenge commitment on increasing public participation in decision-making.
Call for Application to Support the Implementation of Reform Commitments in the 2023-2025 Ukraine and Moldova OGP Action Plans
With this Call, OGP seeks to advance the successful implementation of open governance reforms in Moldova and Ukraine in the framework of their respective 2023-2025 OGP action plans.
Shaping the Future: Advancing Collective Action for Impactful Beneficial Ownership Transparency
This blog post was originally posted on Open Ownership’s website. Read the original post here. The International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), hosted by the Government of Lithuania in June 2024, gathered practitioners from around the globe to discuss and advance action…
Leveraging OGP Action Plans to Meet EU Membership Requirements
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.