
Georgian Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia Addresses the OGP Virtual Leaders Summit
Watch Georgian Prime Minister Gakharia's remarks from the 2020 OGP Virtual Leaders Summit.
2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Georgia is currently implementing 28 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to public services, open contracting, labor safety, shelter strategy for homelessness and improving access to court decisions.
Watch Georgian Prime Minister Gakharia's remarks from the 2020 OGP Virtual Leaders Summit.
Learn about ADB and OGP's innovation challenge that explored how digital technology can be leveraged to strengthen the monitoring of COVID-19 related spending and improve feedback and grievance redressal mechanisms. The challenge is now closed.
Through a new online platform, Georgian citizens can learn about government budgets and reporting concerns.
Point of Contact
GE0066, 2018, Marginalized Communities
GE0067, 2018, Public Participation
GE0068, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
GE0069, 2018, Private Sector
GE0070, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0071, 2018, Anti-Corruption
GE0072, 2018, Sustainable Development Goals
GE0073, 2018, Public Participation
GE0074, 2018, Justice
GE0075, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0076, 2018, Anti-Corruption
GE0077, 2018, Fiscal Openness
GE0078, 2018, Anti-Corruption
GE0079, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0080, 2018, Legislation & Regulation
GE0081, 2018, Subnational
GE0082, 2018, Open Data
GE0083, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0084, 2018, Fiscal Openness
GE0085, 2018, Lobbying
GE0086, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0087, 2018, Public Service Delivery
GE0088, 2018, Public Participation
GE0089, 2018, Public Participation
GE0090, 2018, Fiscal Openness
GE0091, 2018, Lobbying
GE0092, 2018, Public Participation
GE0093, 2018, Sustainable Development Goals
GE0056, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0057, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0058, 2016, Public Participation
GE0059, 2016, Public Service Delivery
GE0060, 2016, Fiscal Openness
GE0061, 2016, Private Sector
GE0062, 2016, Fiscal Openness
GE0063, 2016, Subnational
GE0064, 2016, Public Participation
GE0065, 2016, Fiscal Openness
GE0042, 2016, Marginalized Communities
GE0043, 2016, Public Service Delivery
GE0044, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0045, 2016, Public Service Delivery
GE0046, 2016, Public Service Delivery
GE0047, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0048, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0049, 2016, Public Participation
GE0050, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0051, 2016, Justice
GE0052, 2016, Public Participation
GE0053, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0054, 2016, Public Service Delivery
GE0055, 2016, Anti-Corruption
GE0013, 2014, Public Participation
GE0014, 2014,
GE0015, 2014, Public Service Delivery
GE0016, 2014, Capacity Building
GE0017, 2014, Capacity Building
GE0018, 2014, E-Government
GE0019, 2014, Open Data
GE0020, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0021, 2014, Public Participation
GE0022, 2014, Public Participation
GE0023, 2014, Labor
GE0024, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0025, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0026, 2014, Public Service Delivery
GE0027, 2014, Civic Space
GE0028, 2014, Capacity Building
GE0029, 2014, Fiscal Openness
GE0030, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0031, 2014, Labor
GE0032, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0033, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0034, 2014, Anti-Corruption
GE0035, 2014, Fiscal Openness
GE0036, 2014, E-Government
GE0037, 2014, Public Service Delivery
GE0038, 2014, Public Service Delivery
GE0039, 2014,
GE0040, 2014, Public Participation
GE0041, 2014, Subnational
GE0001, 2012, Public Service Delivery
GE0002, 2012, Subnational
GE0003, 2012, E-Government
GE0004, 2012, Public Service Delivery
GE0005, 2012, E-Government
GE0006, 2012, E-Government
GE0007, 2012, Justice
GE0008, 2012, Anti-Corruption
GE0009, 2012, Anti-Corruption
GE0010, 2012, Anti-Corruption
GE0011, 2012, Public Service Delivery
GE0012, 2012, Capacity Building
2019, Letter, Web Page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
he data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Learn how OGP members are advancing partnerships and community-oriented policing.
From the COVID-19 pandemic to the heightening climate crisis to an increase in authoritarian overreach, 2020 has sorely tested the strength of democracies globally. Even while the world continues to reel from the effects of these multiple threats, at least…
Con la pandemia del COVID-19, la crisis climática y el alza en el autoritarismo, 2020 ha puesto a prueba la fortaleza de las democracias de todo el mundo. En medio de los efectos de estas amenazas, hay por lo menos…
OGP welcomes 56 new local jurisdictions composed of 64 local governments and civil society organizations to join OGP Local at a critical time for open government.
Trabajarán con la ciudadanía y sociedad civil para crear gobiernos más transparentes, inclusivos y participativos Washington, D.C. – Hoy, la Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto (OGP por sus siglas en inglés) da la bienvenida a 56 nuevas jurisdicciones locales compuestas por…
Watch Georgian Prime Minister Gakharia's remarks from the 2020 OGP Virtual Leaders Summit.
Open government reformers from the Asia-Pacific region discuss how to maintain inclusive civic participation and hold and expand civic space during the COVID-19 crisis. Watch the recording...
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close