2018-2020
Action Plan 4
Georgia is currently implementing 28 commitments from their 2018-2020 action plan.
This action plan features commitments related to public services, open contracting, labor safety, shelter strategy for homelessness and improving access to court decisions.
Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.
Armenia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine - joined OGP in 2011. Though different in many ways, these countries shared a strong incentive to use their participation in OGP to address Soviet legacies of opaque and highly centralized governance.
Armenia, Georgia, Moldavia y Ucrania, se incorporaron a OGP en 2011. Aunque son diferentes en muchos sentidos, estos países comparten el incentivo de utilizar su participación en OGP para atender la herencia soviética de la gobernanza opaca y altamente centralizada.
The Independent Reporting Mechanism shares an overview of OGP progress in Eastern Partnership countries and offers recommendations for stronger commitment implementation and greater collaboration with civil society throughout the action plan cycle.
Point of Contact
2019, Letter, Web Page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2019, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Action Plan, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Letter, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Resource, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
On July 18, a global investigation uncovered how mobile phones of journalists, activists, and opposition leaders ...
Watch the recording of the first event in a series of conversations on the role of parliaments and representative democracy at large in the Eastern Partnership region.
Peer exchange is an essential component of the OGP model. Learn how it can inspire reformers, provide a safe space for discussing common challenges, serve as a platform of joint problem solving, and strengthen the sense of community among reformers.
Los intercambios de experiencias son un elemento fundamental del modelo de OGP. Aprende como pueden inspirar a reformadores, ofrecer un espacio para discutir retos comunes, representar una plataforma para la resolución conjunta de problemas y fortalece el espíritu comunitario entre los reformadores.
The European Union (EU), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Open Government Partnership (OGP) announce a new assistance programme to support the Eastern Partnership countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine) advance and implement…
Armenia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine - joined OGP in 2011. Though different in many ways, these countries shared a strong incentive to use their participation in OGP to address Soviet legacies of opaque and highly centralized governance.
Armenia, Georgia, Moldavia y Ucrania, se incorporaron a OGP en 2011. Aunque son diferentes en muchos sentidos, estos países comparten el incentivo de utilizar su participación en OGP para atender la herencia soviética de la gobernanza opaca y altamente centralizada.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish