Skip Navigation

Armenia

  • Member Since 2011
  • Action Plan 5

Credit: Vahe Sulahyan

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2022-2024

Action Plan 5

  • Number of Commitments: 10
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified

Armenia’s fifth action plan features promising commitments around data management, public communications, participatory budgeting, transparency of gifts received by public officials, and public procurement. Implementation will benefit from measures to ensure sustainability of results and more intensive public engagement. (More)


EaP High-Level Launch Event Page Banner

EU for Integrity Programme for the Eastern Partnership

Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.


Contact

Point of Contact

Lilya Afrikyan OGP Coordinator/Point of Contact, Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia lilia.afrikyan@gov.am

Commitments


Resources

  1. EU for Integrity Programme: Third Year Snapshot

    2023, Web page

  2. Armenia – Process Update Letter (August 2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  3. Armenia Action Plan Review 2022-2024 – For Public Comment

    2023, Report Comments, Web page

  4. Vanadzor & Gyumri – Letter of Support (2023)

    2023, Letter, Web page

  5. Action plan – Yerevan, Armenia, 2023 – 2024

    2023, Action Plan, Web page

  6. Action plan – Armavir, Armenia, 2022 – 2025

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  7. Armenia Action Plan 2022-2024 (December)

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  8. EU for Integrity Programme: Second-Year Snapshot

    2022, Web page

  9. Yerevan – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  10. Armavir – Letter of Support (2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  11. Armenia – Contrary to Process Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  12. Action plan – Gyumri, Armenia, 2021 – 2026

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Action plan – Vanadzor, Armenia, 2021 – 2026

    2021, Action Plan, Web page

  14. Armenia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  15. IRM Regional Snapshot: Eastern Partnership

    2021, Resource, Web page

  16. Armenia Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  17. Vanadzor + Gyumri – Letter of Support

    2021, Letter, Web page

  18. Armenia Design Report 2018-2020

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  19. Armenia Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2019, Report Comments, Web page

  20. Armenia – Letter of Candidacy for 2019 Steering Committee Elections

    2019, Letter, Web page

  21. Armenia End-Term Report 2016-2018

    2019, IRM Report, Web page

  22. Armenia End-of-Term Self-Assessment Report 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  23. Armenia End-of-Term Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  24. Armenia Action Plan 2018-2020

    2018, Action Plan, Web page

  25. Armenia Progress Report 2016-2018

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  26. Armenia Progress Report 2016-2018 – For Public Comment

    2018, Report Comments, Web page

  27. Armenia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016

    2018, IRM Report, Web page

  28. Armenia Mid-Term Self-Assessment 2016-2018

    2018, Self Assessment, Web page

  29. Armenia End-of-Term Report 2014-2016 – For Public Comment

    2017, Report Comments, Web page

  30. Armenia Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  31. Armenia End of Term Self-Assessment Report 2014-2016

    2016, Self Assessment, Web page

  32. Armenia’s Third National Action Plan 2016-2018

    2016, Action Plan, Web page

  33. Armenia IRM Progress Report for 2014-2015

    2016, IRM Report, Web page

  34. Armenia Action Plan 2011-2012

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  35. Armenia IRM Progress Report 2012-2013

    2015, IRM Report, Web page

  36. Armenia, Second Action Plan, 2014-16

    2015, Action Plan, Web page

  37. Armenia, Self-Assessment, 2014-16 (English)

    2015, Self Assessment, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2
0
0
0
Action Plan 3
1
0
0
Action Plan 4
0

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
2
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Action Plan 3
Action Plan 4

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Implement for Results
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Recent Posts

Georgia

A Decade Towards Open Governance: The Latest OGP Results from the Eastern Partnership Countries

Armenia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine - joined OGP in 2011. Though different in many ways, these countries shared a strong incentive to use their participation in OGP to address Soviet legacies of opaque and highly centralized governance.

Show More
Open Government Partnership