Leveraging OGP Action Plans to Meet EU Membership Requirements
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.
2023-2025
Action Plan 6
Ukraine’s sixth action plan includes commitments addressing the transparency of and participation in restoration processes, harmonization with European Union (EU) legislation, and restoring access to information. Most commitments will be embedded in legislation to ensure their sustainability beyond donor support. Successful implementation will benefit from the consistent support of local and international partners. (More)
The OGP Independent Reporting Mechanisms explores how Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine can leverage their future action plans as they pursue EU membership.
Take a look at Ukraine’s 10-year journey as a champion in OGP, their progress that has been tragically interrupted by the war, and how reformers continue to live by and fight for the principles of open government.
Learn about this multi-year collaboration that aims strengthen the support and resources available to country reformers in the region to deepen reforms and advance bold, new ideas in areas like strengthening public service delivery, opening civic space, promoting a fair justice system and fighting corruption.
Point of Contact
2024, IRM Report, Web page
2024, Report Comments, Web page
2024, Web page
2023, Action Plan, Web page
2023, Web page
2023, IRM Report, Web page
2023, Report Comments, Web page
2023, Self Assessment, Web page
2023, Letter, Web page
2022, IRM Report, Web page
2022, Web page
2022, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Resource, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Letter, Web page
2021, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
2019, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Report Comments, Web page
2019, Action Plan, Web page
2018, Self Assessment, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Letter, Web page
2016, Self Assessment, Web page
2016, Action Plan, Web page
2016, Report Comments, Web page
2016, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
Join us as we celebrate the diversity and innovation of Open Gov Week 2024 by showcasing events from Africa to the Americas, from Asia-Pacific to Europe.
Welcome to the Open Government Partnership (OGP) webinar on the Open Government Challenge! In this pre-recorded session, we delve into innovative approaches to open government and explore inspiring examples from the Dominican Republic, Ukraine, Costa Rica, and Finland. Join us as…
Meet Oleksandr Yarema, the State Secretary of the Cabinet of Ministers and co-chair of the OGP Coordination Council in Ukraine. We sat down with Oleksandr on the sidelines of the OGP Europe Regional Meeting to learn about his efforts over the years to promote civil society and public participation in decision-making, ensure access to public information, and, more recently, aid the reconstruction efforts in Ukraine.
Esta publicación fue producida con el apoyo financiero de la Unión Europea. Su contenido es responsabilidad exclusiva de Open Government Partnership y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones de la Unión Europea. Conoce a Oleksandr Yarema, secretario de estado del Gabinete…
Over the last decade, OGP members have made 159 commitments to make the governance of gas, oil, and mineral extraction more open to the public. Extractive sector reforms are notoriously politically and financially fraught. Yet these commitments achieve stronger early…
Durante la última década, los miembros de OGP han hecho 159 compromisos enfocados en lograr que la gobernanza de la extracción de gas, petróleo y minerales sea más abierta al público. Las reformas del sector extractivo son notoriamente complicadas desde…
On 11 October 2022, the CEO of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Sanjay Pradhan, the Director of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Rafael Benitez, and the Executive Director of the Association of Ukrainian Cities (AUC) Oleksandr Slobozhan, signed a Memorandum of Understanding to support in the reconstruction of Ukrainian communities after Russia’s full-scale invasion.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close