2020-2022
Action Plan 4
The Open State Committee led the co-creation of the fourth action plan, which connects the national priorities with the international open government agenda. The implementation of the plan is expected to lead to significant outcomes, including using data to prevent and detect corruption, and enabling the traceability of spending throughout the budget cycle of initiatives related to gender, the Peace Agreement and the health emergency. To increase the action plan potential, the IRM recommends creating tools to document and communicate the corrective actions or improvements in public administration that result from these commitments.
Colombia’s fourth action plan or the “National Open State Plan 2020-2022” includes fifteen commitments that aim to promote open government beyond the national executive branch. The plan contains five commitments adopted by national agencies of the Executive branch, seven commitments adopted by subnational entities and three commitments adopted by audit bodies (National General Attorney) and judiciary agencies (State Council and Constitutional Court).
Join us for Open Americas from September 26 to 29 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Del 26 al 29 de septiembre, ven a Santo Domingo, República Dominicana y únete a personas reformadoras de gobierno, sociedad civil, academia, sector privado y más para intercambiar ideas, crear alianzas y buscar soluciones para construir una región más abierta, más participativa y más inclusiva en un mundo post-pandemia.
Help co-create OGP's new strategy. This page is your go-to resource for all the materials you need to host and join conversations and share your views on how OGP can tackle the challenges of today and tomorrow.
When his community was hit by COVID-19, Jimmy used a citizen audit tool to investigate how the government was spending response and recovery resources.
Point of Contact
2020, Letter, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2017, Action Plan, Web page
2020, Action Plan, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2020, Report Comments, Web page
2018, IRM Report, Web page
2018, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2020, Self Assessment, Web page
2021, IRM Report, Web page
2021, Report Comments, Web page
2017, Letter, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2017, Self Assessment, Web page
2015, IRM Report, Web page
2015, Action Plan, Web page
2019, Perspective, Web page
2017, IRM Report, Web page
2019, Research Product, Web page
The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.
No IRM data
Pending IRM Review
Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.
Stars (Global average 7%)
Focus on implementation
Focus on design
Pending IRM review
No IRM data
Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)
Focus on relevance to open government
Focus on verifiability
This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.
Participation was closed
Participation was open to any interested party
No IRM data
Forum
Pending IRM review
Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda
Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs
Consult: Public gave input
Inform: Government provided public with information on plan
The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.
This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.
These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.
Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.
(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.
Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
IRM-Based Findings
We all have a story about how democracy has affected our lives, our families and friends, our communities, our countries, and the world at large.
Todas las personas tenemos una historia de cómo la democracia ha afectado nuestra vida o la de nuestra familia y amigos, nuestra comunidad o país o el mundo en general. También, muchos de nosotros tenemos historias de cómo la regresión democrática ha afectado nuestras libertades, hogares e incluso nuestras vidas.
Nous avons tous une histoire sur la façon dont la démocratie a affecté nos vies, nos familles et nos amis, nos communautés, nos pays et le monde en général. Beaucoup trop d’entre nous ont également des histoires sur la façon…
When his community was hit by COVID-19, Jimmy used a citizen audit tool to investigate how the government was spending response and recovery resources.
COVID-19 disrupted the globe in unprecedented ways, forcing people and organizations in all corners of the world to adjust to a new reality. OGP was no exception.
To deal with a justice system that was complicated, Colombia’s Ministry of Justice developed the mobile application LegalApp, providing free legal knowledge and access to its public, presented in accessible language.
In Colombia, a collaboration between the Council of State and its citizens has led to a more transparent judicial system that is accountable to the people.
Click here for more information about the Open Government Partnership's terms of use.
Terms & Conditions Close
English
French
Spanish