Skip Navigation

Cabo Verde

  • Member Since 2015
  • Action Plan 2

ON THE PAGE


Current Action Plan

2023-2025

Action Plan 2

  • Number of Commitments: 8
  • Policy Area Focus: Not specified


Point of Contact

Harold Tavares Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister of Cabo Verde, Prime Minister's Office haroldtavares@gmail.com

Commitments


Resources

  1. Cabo Verde Action Plan 2023-2025

    2022, Action Plan, Web page

  2. Cabo Verde Co-Creation Brief 2022

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  3. Cabo Verde – Contrary to Process Letter (April 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  4. Cabo Verde Transitional Results Report 2018-2021

    2022, IRM Report, Web page

  5. Cabo Verde Transitional Results Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2022, Report Comments, Web page

  6. Cabo Verde – Under Review Letter (February 2022)

    2022, Letter, Web page

  7. Data Protection in Africa: A Look at OGP Member Progress

    2021, Research Product, Web page

  8. Cabo Verde Design Report 2018-2020

    2021, IRM Report, Web page

  9. Cabo Verde – Contrary to Process Letter (March 2021)

    2021, Letter, Web page

  10. Cabo Verde Design Report 2018-2020 – For Public Comment

    2021, Report Comments, Web page

  11. Cabo-Verde_Action-Plan_2018-2020.pdf

    2019, Document, PDF

  12. Cabo Verde Action Plan 2018-2020

    2019, Action Plan, Web page

  13. Cabo Verde – Cohort Shift Letter – January 2018

    2018, Letter, Web page

  14. OGP Letter – Cabo Verde – November 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  15. Cabo Verde Letter of Intent to Join OGP

    2017, Letter, Web page

  16. OGP Letter to Cabo Verde Regarding Shift to ‘Odd Year’ Action Plan Schedule: January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  17. OGP Letter to Cabo Verde Regarding Late Action Plan: November 2016

    2017, Letter, Web page

  18. OGP Letter – Cabo Verde – January 2017

    2017, Letter, Web page

  19. Late Letter – November 2016 – Cabo Verde

    2016, Letter, Web page


Current Data

The data below is updated periodically, most often after large numbers of new action plans and IRM reports.

Commitment Performance

The following variables answer the question “Did this commitment open government?“, and focus on how government practices have changed as a result of the commitment’s implementation.

Key

No IRM data

Pending IRM Review

Major
Outstanding
Starred Commitments
Action Plan 1
0
Action Plan 2

Global

Most per action plan
4
7

Regional

Most per action plan
0
3

How to Get More Starred Commitments

Starred commitments in OGP are one of the ways the IRM designates promising reforms. The graph below shows where the major areas for improvement in action plan design and implementation should take place based on past action plans.

Key

Stars (Global average 7%)

Focus on implementation

Focus on design

Pending IRM review

No IRM data

Focus on design

Focus on objectives and impact (ambition/potential impact)

Focus on relevance to open government

Focus on verifiability

Action Plan 2

Public Participation

This table shows: 1) the level of public influence during the development and implementation of OGP action plans, 2) whether consultations were open to any member of the public or only to those invited; and 3) whether a forum existed that met regularly.

Key

Participation was closed

Participation was open to any interested party

No IRM data

Forum

Pending IRM review

Definitions

Collaborate: Iterative dialogue and public helped set agenda

 

Involve: Government gave feedback on public inputs

 

Consult: Public gave input

 

Inform: Government provided public with information on plan

Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Development

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2
Collaborate
Involve
Consult
Inform
No Consultation

Implementation

Action Plan 1
Action Plan 2

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Selected Dimensions of Open Government

This section captures how each OGP member can play a leadership role, based on IRM-based findings and third-party scores. This list does not cover all of open government and OGP members are not required to take any action.

Action implications

These are recommendations on the role that each OGP member might play in each policy area. The recommendations are derived from a combination of the IRM-based findings and third-party scores.

IRM-based findings

Reflect the performance of commitments in a particular policy area, as assessed by the IRM.

 

(NC) No Commitments
(CA) Commitment(s) in the policy area.
(IR) IRM-Reviewed: At least one IRM-assessed commitment.
(C) Was Complete: At least one commitment was substantially or fully completed.
(A) Was Ambitious: At least one commitment with moderate or transformative potential impact.
(ER) Showed Early Results: At least one commitment opened government in a “Major” or “Outstanding” way.

Third-party scores

Reflect “real-world” performance, i.e., performance outside of the OGP framework. Scores are comprised of various indicators collected by respected organizations.

Anti-Corruption

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Civic Space

Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Open Policy Making

Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Access to Information

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
Action Implications
Consider Action
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)

Fiscal Openness

Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data
Action Implications
No data
IRM-Based Findings
NC
CA
IR
C
A
ER
3rd-Party Score (0-4)
No data

Recent Posts

headway-5QgIuuBxKwM-unsplash

Design for Results: Introducing the IRM’s First Co-Creation Briefs

This year, OGP’s Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) started rolling out the Co-Creation Brief, a new product that shares lessons from past action plans and open government practice to support reformers in co-designing ambitious and feasible commitments.

School inspection in Kaduna, Nigeria
Cabo Verde Parliaments Workshop 1

Parliament Paving the Way: Co-Creation in Cabo Verde

Every so often, simple ideas simply work. When Cabo Verde’s National Assembly set out to break down barriers to citizen engagement, they got out the sledgehammer.

FACT SHEET: Advancing Democracy, Human Rights, Gender Equality, Wildlife Conservation, and Governance in Africa

This is a United States government document. This White House fact sheet outlines the developments made in Africa in regards advancing democracy, human rights, gender equality, wildlife conservation, and governance. The document was produced following President Barack Obama's visit to Kenya…

Show More
Open Government Partnership