Oversight of Budget/Fiscal Policies | Open Government Partnership

OGP Global Report Data

The data below is drawn from the 2019 OGP Global Report. You can view and learn more about the report here.

Implement for Results Share Innovation Consider Action New Initiative No data

These are members making OGP commitments to improve their performance in the respective policy area. As members that have demonstrated political commitment through OGP, the next step is ensuring that implemented commitments have maximal impact.

Armenia

Azerbaijan ( 2.5 )

Colombia ( 2.7 )

Dominican republic ( 2.3 )

United kingdom ( 2.5 )

As leaders, these members may consider playing a peer-support role by sharing their experiences and innovations with others in OGP, if they are not already doing so.

Brazil ( 3.0 )

Czech republic ( 3.3 )

Kyrgyz republic ( 3.0 )

United states ( 3.4 )

These members have room for improvement in the respective policy area according to the third-party score and have not leveraged their OGP action plans to address the issue. They may consider reforms in the respective policy area, either within or outside of the OGP framework.

Cote d'ivoire ( 1.2 )

Slovak republic ( 2.2 )

Trinidad and tobago ( 1.8 )

Tunisia ( 1.4 )

These members have not made ambitious OGP commitments or commitments that have shown early results. However, these members have recently made commitment(s) in the respective policy area that have not yet been assessed by the IRM. The OGP community will monitor these commitments and soon report on the progress achieved.

Afghanistan ( 1.7 )

Argentina ( 2.2 )

Burkina faso ( 1.5 )

Elgeyo marakwet, kenya

Finland

Liberia ( 2.2 )

North macedonia ( 2.2 )

Nigeria ( 2.2 )

Papua new guinea ( 1.2 )

Philippines ( 2.6 )

Scotland, united kingdom

There is not enough third-party data available to identify an action implication.