Skip Navigation

A country’s participation in OGP may be reviewed by the Criteria and Standards Subcommittee, or by the full Steering Committee upon recommendation by the C&S, if it acts contrary to OGP process, or contrary to OGP principles.

The OGP Articles of Governance state that:

“OGP participating governments are expected to uphold the values and principles articulated in the Open Government Declaration and to consistently and continually advance open governance for the well-being of their citizens. If a participating government repeatedly (in two consecutive action plan cycles) acts contrary to OGP process and to its action plan commitments (see Addenda B and C), fails to adequately address issues raised by the IRM, or is taking actions that undermine the values and principles of OGP, upon recommendation of the C&S, the SC may review the participation of that government in OGP.”

A country is considered to have acted contrary to process when any of the following actions apply:

  1. The country does not publish an Action Plan within 4 months of the due date (by December 31).
  2. The government does not meet the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) “Involve” requirement during development or “Inform” during implementation of the Action Plan as assessed by the IRM.
  3. The government fails to collect, publish and document a repository on the national OGP website/webpage in line with IRM guidance.
  4. The IRM Report establishes that there was no progress made on implementing any of the commitments in the country’s Action Plan.

When a country is found to have acted contrary to process, the Support Unit will notify the government via a letter that is also published below and in the OGP Gazette. If a country acts contrary to process for two consecutive Action Plan cycles, it will be placed under Procedural Review by the Criteria and Standards Subcommittee. If a country fails to address the problems that lead to the review process, the Criteria and Standards Subcommittee may consider to recommend to the full Steering Committee that the country be designated as inactive. To exit the Procedural Review process, protocol may be applied depending on the trigger that leads a country to act contrary to process for the second of the two action plan cycles. Review the protocol here.

The Support Unit will make public all communications regarding governments acting contrary to process below, and list all countries that are currently under review or designated as inactive pursuant to Procedural Review in this page. Any inquiries can be directed to the OGP Support Unit at

Countries currently under review:

Due to COVID-19, the Criteria and Standards Subcommittee approved a set of guidelines for 2020 that have an impact on the Procedural Review process. Please refer to this Resolution for more information.

Official letters sent to OGP Countries are posted here.









Open Government Partnership