Skip Navigation

A thought exercise for Civil Society within the OGP

Su Muhereza|

Open government is about enabling citizens to participate in the decisions that affect their lives, and making government more transparent, responsive and accountable.  The Open Government Partnership has emerged as a leading platform in realizing that ambition, with civil society being the principal partner in realizing it. Governments that join OGP have to meet minimum requirements around openness and are monitored closely.  What if – in the spirit of partnership – civil society was asked to meet some minimum level of openness? What would it look like?

In order to be eligible to participate in the Open Government Partnership (OGP), governments must demonstrate a minimum level of commitment to open government principles in four key areas: Fiscal Transparency, Access to Information, Income and Asset Disclosures and Citizen Engagement. A country is eligible to join the OGP if its government meets these criteria measured by objective governance indicators using public data sources. 

In addition, the OGP encourages governments to do other things: follow guidelines on openness and transparency, ensure timely delivery of action plans and hold meaningful consultation with civil society. OGP encourages governments to define commitments that are relevant to open government, house OGP at an appropriate ministry and use OGP as a domestic accountability mechanism.

There have been increasing calls for civil society organizations to be more transparent, responsive and accountable. CSOs have influence in society and politics albeit to varying degrees in different countries. They are providers of essential services, advocates for marginalized groups and advisors on public policy. They are important players in national and international governance; however the OGP does not place requirements on civil society in the way that it does for governments.  

The civil society members of OGP can adapt transparency tools such as Glasspockets and IATI to assess their own transparency and make it easily accessible to the general public.  OGP inspired criteria for civil society openness might look something like the table below:

Basic information

           Transparency Criteria

Leadership

  • What does the boss earn?
  • Who sits on the Board?
  • What is the policy on conflicts of interest?
  • How does the organization facilitate internal democracy?

Finances

  • Who funds the organization?
  • Are financial statements easily and readily accessible?

Performance

  • An annual report of programs/projects highlighting impact, ‘failure’ and learning
  • Can beneficiaries provide feedback to the organization?
  • Is there active collaboration with other actors/organizations?

Does the organizations work support the Open Government Principles?

  • Increase availability of information about governmental activities 
  • Support civic participation
  • Ensure professional integrity
  • Increase access to new tech for openness 

Encouraging a transparency standard for civil society engaged in OGP would show benefits similar to those we see in governments that have embraced the OGP criteria: increase in public trust, enhanced collaboration and peer learning and collaboration between different civil society actors both nationally and internationally. Should the OGP begin developing a set of principles for civil society members to sign on to? And while we are thinking on it: what about the private sector, media and multi-laterals that are also part of the OGP platform?

Open Government Partnership