Skip Navigation

Peru Results Report 2023-2025

Peru’s fifth Open Government Action Plan was the first to include commitments from all three branches of the State. It demonstrated a high level of completion and significant early results, with 10 out of 13 commitments either completed or substantially completed. Progress was particularly relevant in sectors with historical deficits in participation and transparency. However, this occurred in a context where, overall, the commitments showed limited levels of ambition. Looking ahead, civil society involvement could be expanded throughout the plan’s implementation and evaluation, moving beyond the multi-stakeholder forum.

Implementation

Peru’s fifth action plan—the first to incorporate commitments from the Executive, Judiciary, and Congress—stood out for its broad, structured, and cross-cutting co-creation process. This process featured active participation from the multi-stakeholder forum[1], the inclusion of new civil society actors, and an approach designed to ensure stakeholders played a leading role throughout the design stage.

This effort contributed to a high level of completion: 10 of the 13 commitments were completed or substantially completed. Significant early results were achieved in environmental and student engagement through commitments 1 and 6; both were identified as promising in the Action Plan Review, and their implementation confirmed that potential.

The plan’s implementation revealed solid performance with verifiable early results. The most significant progress was concentrated in sectors facing persistent challenges regarding participation and transparency. In the environmental sector, the updated national certification procedure strengthened participatory mechanisms in an area of high social conflict. In education, the modernization of the student participation system and the implementation of the Somos Pares strategy consolidated a sustained, institutionalized national policy. The commitments with the best results shared common characteristics: stable technical leadership, participatory validation during implementation, and clear regulatory frameworks that enabled sustainable change beyond the plan’s cycle.

While the plan successfully expanded its institutional reach by involving all three branches of government, this growth did not translate into a proportional increase in ambition. Several commitments simply revisited previous lines of work with incremental improvements.

Participation and Co-Creation 

The co-creation process was a primary strength of this cycle. The multi-stakeholder forum led the selection of themes, incorporated assessments developed by civil society organizations, and integrated new actors into a participatory dynamic that marked an improvement over previous cycles. Co-creation sought to empower stakeholders throughout all stages, not just at the outset, resulting in a more informed and representative design.

During implementation, however, the effectiveness of participation declined. A temporary reconfiguration of the technical team in 2023 affected the continuity of methodological support and reduced the intensity of dialogue with civil society. While the forum maintained its multisectoral composition and formal mandate, its activity became concentrated on receiving informational reports rather than providing regular follow-up or recommendations. This stands in contrast to the fourth plan, where the forum held regular meetings, despite challenges identified by civil society. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening the institutional stability of the process and, crucially, empowering civil society to ensure continuous participation and greater influence.

Implementation in Context 

Implementation unfolded within an unstable political context, marked by changes in high-level officials and staff turnover in key sectors[2]. These factors hindered prioritization and the ability of some entities to sustain consistent progress[3]. Nevertheless, the country demonstrated the institutionalization of open government, evidenced by the consolidation of the multi-stakeholder forum[4], the diversification of participating state actors, and the availability of an updated public repository that ensured process transparency.

This cycle demonstrates that Peru has a solid institutional foundation to advance a more ambitious Open Government agenda—both horizontally, by more effectively integrating the three branches of government, and vertically, through potential regional and local commitments. Strengthening technical continuity, consolidating the multi-stakeholder forum, and empowering civil society represent key opportunities to raise the ambition and impact of future action plans.

 

 

[1] See the integration of the Open Government Multi-Stakeholder Forum here: https://www.gob.pe/49826-gobierno-abierto-foro-multiactor-de-gobierno-abierto

[2] Interview with Diana Suárez and Fátima Contreras of the Peruvian Society for Environmental Law, representatives of civil society at the Multi-stakeholder Open Government Forum, December 18, 2025. They indicated that the last implementation report shared with the Forum corresponded to the fifth progress report, presented in November 2024, even though a total of eight reports were published.

[3] Interview with Elsa Galarza, member of the Multi-stakeholder Open Government Forum 2024-2026 for the academic sector, December 4, 2025.

[4] Interview with Jimena Sánchez Velarde, representative of the private sector in the Multi-stakeholder Open Government Forum, December 18, 2025.

Downloads

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *